4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,738–3,748 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 12:56
3,739
-2
9 Aug 2026, 23:35
3,741
-6
6 Aug 2026, 04:32
3,747
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:07
3,747
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.6%
avg views ÷ 3,739 subscribers
Avg views / post
808
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.701%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
21 (16 May 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
2,424
Reactions total
17
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 16s
Average length
2m 08s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
357 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
129
36.1%
❤
99
27.7%
👏
77
21.6%
🔥
38
10.6%
👎
7
1.96%
🤯
3
0.84%
😁
2
0.56%
🤔
2
0.56%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 379reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤝 O‘zbekiston ilk bor mezbonlik qilgan OFK Elit hakamlari seminari o‘z yakuniga yetdi.
Milliy futbol markazida 3–7-avgust kunlari davomida tashkil etilgan seminar doirasida OFKga a'zo mamlakatlardan tashrif buyurgan 92 nafar hakamlar va instruktorlar ishtirokida nazariy hamda amaliy mashg‘ulotlar o‘tkazildi.
Mashg‘ulotlarda o‘yin vaziyatlarini tahlil qilish, hakamlarning maydondagi harakatlanishi, jamoaviy hamkorli…
УЕФА утвердил единую процедуру просмотра для ВАР и судей
Судейский комитет УЕФА утвердил процедуру просмотра повторов на мониторе у поля после ВАР-вмешательства. Ее следует применять во внутренних соревнованиях и в международных турнирах под эгидой УЕФА.
«Чтобы помочь судьям и укрепить доверие к видеоарбитрам, мы рекомендуем официальным лицам матча придерживаться единой четырехэтапной процедуры просмотра эпизода на…
French referee Clément Turpin, who is officiating the Norway vs. England match, is taking charge of his fourth game at the current tournament and his 9th match overall across three World Cups.
This equals the second-best record in World Cup history. Only Ravshan Irmatov has officiated more matches (11).
The top 8 referees by the number of World Cup matches ordered is as follows:
1️⃣1️⃣ Ravshan Irmatov 🇺🇿 (2010, 2014,…
Французский рефери Клеман Тюрпен, который обслуживает матч Норвегия - Англия, проводит свой четвертый матч на нынешнем турнире и 9-й матч на третьем Кубке мира.
Это повторение второго лучшего результата в истории Кубков мира. Больше матчей (11) провел только Равшан Ирматов.
Список восьми лучших рефери по количеству матчей Кубков мира выглядит так:
1️⃣1️⃣ Равшан Ирматов 🇺🇿 (2010, 2014, 2018)
9️⃣ Нестор Питана 🇦🇷 (2…
11-м удар. Процедура:
Мяч должен быть установлен неподвижно таким образом, чтобы часть мяча касалась или находилась над центром 11-метровой отметки...
Penalty Kick. Procedure:
The ball must be stationary, with part of the ball touching or overhanging the centre of the penalty mark...
«На нас никто не может повлиять».
После завершения матчей 1/8 финала Чемпионата мира по футболу FIFA 2026™ глава судейского департамента ФИФА Пьерлуиджи Коллина поделился ключевыми выводами о работе арбитров, их независимости и использовании технологий на турнире:
О честности и независимости: Коллина решительно защитил судей ФИФА от необоснованных обвинений, подчеркнув, что все решения принимаются честно и полность…
Пьерлуиджи Коллина подводит промежуточные итоги судейства на Чемпионате мира 2026™
Главное:
Меры по борьбе с затягиванием времени оказались очень эффективными.
Новые правила были разъяснены тренерам, игрокам и СМИ еще до начала турнира.
Наблюдается резкое снижение количества травм у игроков.
Пьерлуиджи Коллина, председатель Судейского комитета ФИФА
Перед началом Чемпионата мира по футболу ФИФА 2026™ было принят…
Обновление на учебной платформе арбитров Федерации футбола Саудовской Аравии.
Saudi Arabian Football Federation refereeing TM platform was updated.
https://safftm.com/ref/home
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Therefereepro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 319,182 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Referee” (@Therefereepro), 3,739 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Therefereepro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
