Channel
@zw6886
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
244subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002971467174 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zw6886 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zw6886 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 244 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 241 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 243 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 243 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (24 May 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 39 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
7 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 57.1% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 28.6% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢【重要通知｜隱私安全規範】 為保障女生隱私與安全，嚴禁攜帶或使用任何具有偷拍、錄影、錄音功能之設備。凡攜帶或使用以下設備者，均視同有偷拍疑慮處理： • 智慧眼鏡 • 智慧手錶 • 攝影機／運動相機 • 針孔攝影設備 • 攝影筆、錄音筆 • 其他具拍照、錄影、錄音功能之電子設備 一經現場發現： ❶ 女生有權立即終止服務。 ❷ 相關拍攝設備將予以沒收處理。 ❸ 客人需支付違約賠償金20萬日圓。 請務必遵守規定，共同維護安全、尊重與隱私的服務環境。 感謝您的理解與配合。 🎀 可馨Telegram:@yy9882 🎀 可馨GLeezy ：yy789
❤1👌1
為什麼外送預約的價位相對較高，仍然受到許多客人的青睞？ 許多人第一次接觸到府預約服務時，最常提出的疑問就是： 「既然價格比一般娛樂消費高一些，為什麼還是有這麼多人選擇？」 其實，客人所支付的並不只是服務本身，而是整體體驗所帶來的安心感、便利性與品質保障。 ① 安全與安心，是最重要的價值 對於許多來日本旅遊、出差或長期工作的華人朋友來說，陌生的環境往往伴隨著不確定性。透過可馨的協助安排，從預約、溝通到服務流程，都有專人協助確認與對接，讓客人能以更輕鬆的心情享受自己的休息時光。 ② 重視隱私，享受屬於自己的時間 許多客人選擇到府服務的重要原因之一，就是隱私性。 不需要在陌生場所等待，也不需要面對複雜環境或額外社交壓力。 在自己入住的飯店或指定地點內，就能擁有更自在、更放鬆的個人空間。 ③ 經過篩選與安排，體驗更加穩定 不少人都有過網路資訊與實際情況落差過大的經驗。 可馨希望透過事前溝通與協助配對，讓客人能更有效率地找到符合自…
很多時候，我能理解大家在第一次接觸一項服務時的顧慮與不安。 信任從來不是靠幾句話建立，而是靠一次又一次真誠的服務累積而成。 如果現在的你，還沒有辦法完全信任我，沒有關係。我會用時間、態度與誠意，慢慢證明自己。 可馨始終堅持透明、公開、清楚的服務原則： ✓ 價格公開透明 ✓ 不分國籍一致對待 ✓ 不收取隱藏費用 ✓ 不強迫消費、不額外推銷 每一位客人的選擇與權益，都值得被尊重。 謝謝每一位願意給予機會與信任的朋友。 未來的每一次服務，我都會盡力做到更好。 🎀 可馨Telegram:@yy9882 🎀 可馨GLeezy ：yy789
放鬆約妹【包夜】的五大好處 給真的想放鬆的你 1️⃣ 時間自由、不趕不壓力 不像短鐘只能匆匆來去，包夜讓你們慢慢來、好好享受，不會一直看時間 吃飯、聊天、泡澡、做愛…都可以自在安排 2️⃣ 妹妹更放鬆、更投入 包夜的互動不是「一次性服務」，而是像男女朋友相處 妹妹願意撒嬌、願意陪你賴床、也更願意用心取悅你 3️⃣ 可以多次、多種玩法 包夜最實際的福利就是：可以多次，多樣式 從激情到溫柔，從主動到配合，時間夠，就能慢慢玩～ 「先來一發、再抱著睡、半夜還能再續一波」 4️⃣ 睡醒還有人抱，多一份陪伴感 人生最奢侈的事，就是有人陪你入睡、也陪你醒來 不是只有身體滿足，而是有溫度的陪伴，那種幸福感很不一樣 5️⃣ 價格其實划算（有時還比續鐘便宜） 有些客人中途想續鐘，結果一累積就超過包夜價格 乾脆一開始就包夜，反而划算又輕鬆 🎀 可馨Telegram:@yy9882 🎀 可馨GLeezy ：yy789
#東京 一個性福的代名詞 每當被提起的時候 我想大部分人第一時間想到的是 「#大久保公園 」 一個能讓你覺得能找到快樂的地方 可不知快樂的底下藏的是掏空你口袋的陷阱 讓你被低價蒙蔽了雙眼 讓你被誘惑失去了判斷力 努力跟付出是成正比的 那快樂也是！ 天上不會掉餡餅 可能掉的陷阱 🎀 可馨Telegram:@yy9882 🎀 可馨GLeezy ：yy789
❤1
我買的不是日本櫻花妹 我買的是為你分憂解難專屬性福顧問 分憂： 想認識日本女生卻不知道從哪裡開始的你 分憂： 不熟悉日本社交文化、不知道如何交流的你 分憂： 擔心語言不通、溝通困難的你 分憂： 第一次來日本，對流程完全陌生的你 分憂： 擔心遇到詐騙或不實資訊的你 分憂： 工作繁忙，沒有時間自己搜尋資訊的你 分憂： 不知道哪些地區、哪些場所適合認識朋友的你 分憂： 擔心文化差異造成誤會的你 分憂： 希望行程安排更有效率的你 分憂： 不想花冤枉錢踩雷的你 分憂： 希望過程低調、保護個人隱私的你 分憂： 臨時來日本出差，沒有時間做功課的你 分憂： 一個人在日本感到孤單，想有人交流的你 分憂： 對日本夜生活不了解，希望有人提供建議的你 分憂： 想輕鬆體驗日本文化與社交環境的你 不要把我當商人 我只是一個你的性福專屬顧問 ！ 解決所有你所擔心的問題！！！ 🎀 可馨Telegram:@yy9882 🎀 可馨GLeezy ：yy78
為了能快速能為你們安排到合適的選擇 可馨特此給哥哥我們一個預約模版 可把你們的需要詳細的填寫 提供我們更好的溝通跟效率 預約格式:👇👇👇 想約時間： 所在地區 ： 所屬國籍： 理想預算： 體驗時間： 妹妹身材： 妹妹年齡： 特殊服務： 拒絶雷點： 預約範例：👇👇👇 想約時間：6/10 20:00 所在地區 ：東京-新宿 所屬國籍：中國/臺灣/美國/香港等 理想預算：4-6w 體驗時間：120分鐘 妹妹身材：嬌小 廋 妹妹年齡：20-25歲 特殊服務：無套內射不需要可不填 拒絶雷點：無刺青.無煙味
🌸 可馨溫馨提醒｜新手老司機必看 🌸 1️⃣ 不要私留聯絡方式 請勿與妹妹私下交換聯絡方式，一切以可馨安排為主。 2️⃣ 有問題立即反映 如遇服務異常、時間問題等情況，請第一時間聯絡可馨協助處理。 3️⃣ 保管好個人財物 現金、手機及貴重物品請自行妥善保管。 4️⃣ 確認身份再開門 妹妹到達後，可先確認是可馨安排的，避免認錯人。 5️⃣ 提前預約更好安排 熱門妹妹檔期有限，提早預約選擇更多。 6️⃣ 價格以事前談妥為準 如遇索取額外費用或小費，請直接聯絡可馨確認。 7️⃣ 取消請提前告知 若有臨時狀況無法赴約，請盡早通知，彼此尊重。 8️⃣ 加時按原價計算 現場加時不適用優惠，以原定價格為準。 9️⃣ 任何狀況立即聯絡可馨 不要等服務結束後才反映，當下處理最快、最有效。 🌷 安心預約，愉快體驗。 有任何問題請隨時聯絡 可馨の秘密遊び ❤️ 🎀 可馨Telegram:@yy9882 🎀 可馨GLeezy …
#日本3P｛雙飛｝的必看規則 1️⃣.提前2-3天預約 2️⃣.3P的60分鐘只能射一次哦 全程戴套服務 3️⃣.只限熟客 【#為什麽要提前一天預約？】 如果沒有提前預約的話妹妹就沒有辦法抽空出來配合你的時間 所以需要提前一天預約 妹妹才能配合哥哥的時間 【#3P可以無套嗎？ 無套吹也不行嗎？】 不行！！ 因為服務哥哥的妹妹有兩位，如果無套插入的話可能會產生細菌感染之類想一系列 從而產生性病 那哥哥出來玩 那肯定是以自身的安全為前提呀 【#為什麽只能熟客？】 因為3P的話是兩個妹妹 熟客的話會更有保障性 減少爽約之類的風險 PS：雙飛一律不接特殊服務:拍攝 NN 口爆 吞精 毒龍 🎀 可馨Telegram:@yy9882 🎀 可馨GLeezy ：yy789
❤1
東京大阪上門服務 為什麽選擇可馨 一張圖告訴你 （答案） ➡️@yy9882
可馨提醒｜預約與取消規則說明 在日本經常安排約會的朋友都知道，日本並沒有「無條件打槍」的習慣。為了保障每位客人的權益，也讓大家都能玩得開心、花得值得，可馨這邊提供 見面後 10 分鐘內可決定是否繼續約會 的保障機制。 預約流程說明 舉例： 預約時間為 18:00 女孩於 18:00 準時抵達指定飯店或地址後，有約 10 分鐘的見面確認時間。也就是說： 是否決定留下女孩，需於 18:10 前告知。 若超過 18:10，則視為約會正式開始，時間開始計算，之後將無法以不滿意為理由取消。如仍堅持取消，則需支付女孩的取消補償費用。 10分鐘內取消補償費用 東京：5000日圓 大阪市區：6000日圓 大阪郊區：7000～8000日圓 實際金額將依女孩往返距離及交通成本而定。 為什麼需要支付取消費？ 許多客人會問： 「妹妹剛到，我什麼都還沒做，為什麼取消還要付費？」 原因其實很簡單。 當女孩確認接下預約後，就已經開始為這次見面投入時間與…
❤1👌1😁1
📖 小課堂開課了 今天來說「#性的重要性」 性， 不只是生理需求。 它也是： ✔️ 親密感 ✔️ 情緒交流 ✔️ 壓力釋放 ✔️ 被需要的感覺 一個人好的狀態， 性是必不可少的 它不是交易， 而是當自己情緒壓力無處釋放 發泄口 ！！！ 🎀 可馨Telegram:@yy9882 🎀 可馨GLeezy ：yy789
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @zw6886. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 371,932 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🥇東京.大阪櫻花妹上門服務之👉新手上路” (@zw6886), 244 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zw6886.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.