Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🥇東京.大阪恩客真實點評

Channel

🥇東京.大阪恩客真實點評

@yy98827

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

31subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002801482775
TypeChannel
Username@yy98827
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yy98827

Growth

283129.57 August 2026 — 28 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28 subscribers15 August 2026 — 29 subscribers24 August 2026 — 31 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28–31 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 11:1531+2
15 Aug 2026, 20:5529+1
11 Aug 2026, 06:0128no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:3128first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.6%
avg views ÷ 31 subscribers
Avg views / post
11.7
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held7 (27 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total70
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC4 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#東京點評 這個妹妹我喜歡 身材好 眼睛也很漂亮 很有女友的感覺 腿有肉很修長漂亮 胸部看到時候好像不大 但實際掌握的時候 才發現手掌抓不下,我手算比較大的 還是有滿出手掌一些 ,超剛好的 大小 還很挺很美 ,之後可用她的標準來推薦 🇨🇳中文|🇯🇵日文 |🇦🇺English 🎀 可馨Telegram:@yy9882 🎀 可馨GLeezy :yy789 —————————————— 🧚‍♀️出勤名單:東京→ @yy98820 |大阪→@db8881 🧚‍♀️參考導航:新手→@zw6886 |點評→ @yy98827 🧚‍♀️官方網站:https://www.fb664.com #東京外送茶 #日本暗黑外送 #東京外約 #東京風俗 #東京デリヘル #無預付現金支付 #出差旅遊放鬆 #日本全套服務 #東京出張

6 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#東京點評 #新朋友+1 不錯 妹妹很讚 身體香香的 聞起來就很舒服 很放鬆的感覺 好一個百看不如一見 因為:很多時候妹妹的好 不是我用文字就能完美體現的 就算我說了在完美 也還是需要你看到本人 才能真正哪種感覺 🇨🇳中文|🇯🇵日文 |🇦🇺English 🎀 可馨Telegram:@yy9882 🎀 可馨GLeezy :yy789 —————————————— 🧚‍♀️出勤名單:東京→ @yy98820 |大阪→@db8881 🧚‍♀️參考導航:新手→@zw6886 |點評→ @yy98827 🧚‍♀️官方網站:https://www.fb664.com

4 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#今日性福已簽收 #新朋友+1 #感恩信任 身高:158 年齡:22歲 罩杯:C 體重:40 服務過程:很主動的帶領我玩,互動過程中感覺到非常的棒 就是一個非常棒的學生妹 🎀 可馨Telegram:@yy9882 🎀 可馨GLeezy :yy789

3 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#東京點評 #香港新朋友+1 愛了真的愛啦 其實不太想寫太多客評 不希望太多人約她 約那麽多 目前是我最愛喜歡的 小隻馬大奶 被口的很舒服 😁 然後一直說我的太長 大之類的話 全部頂到底了 有戀愛的感覺 🎀 可馨Telegram:@yy9882 🎀 可馨GLeezy :yy789

31 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#大阪點評 好奇問問 你們約白虎的時候 都是什麽樣的體驗的嗯 這是他的體驗: 做的時候就更想要有射的哪種感覺 舔鮑的時候不需要擔心吃到毛 🎀 可馨Telegram:@yy9882 🎀 可馨GLeezy :yy789

31 Jul 2026, 08:16 UTC12 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#東京點評 #臺灣朋友 我們結緣於7月24日 第一次嘗試日本外送茶 有顧慮,有擔心,有害怕 這些都是很正常的 所以我們需要的是一個瞭解彼此的過程 從而信任!在到後面的安心預約 關於服務體驗分享:本人比照片漂亮 , 插了很爽 有點快忍不住 一直在忍耐😳🥵 妹妹很可愛、身材也很好、重點是皮膚很好 一開始被他服務舔身體、奶頭、後來在吃棒棒。說跟日本人比的話、棒棒很大😜 後面就換我一直爽插她,傳教士和後入都有,插了好多下,後來真的忍不住就射了🥺 🎀 可馨Telegram:@yy9882 🎀 可馨GLeezy :yy789

27 Jul 2026, 06:28 UTC24 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#東京點評 嫩妹,禦姐臉,臉比照片好看。瘦,胸部大 妹妹很會吹,沒有齒感,女上插進去,挺緊的。搖了一會,體力不夠,換傳教士。之後試了不少姿勢。順利出水。挺不錯的妹妹,下次再來 態度很好,還會問洗澡水溫度高低 很好說話,會吹,會女上 🇨🇳中文 |🇦🇺English 🎀 可馨Telegram:@yy9882 🎀 可馨GLeezy :yy789 —————————————— 🧚‍♀️出勤名單:東京→ @yy98820 |大阪→@db8881 🧚‍♀️參考導航:新手→@zw6886 |點評→ @yy98827 🧚‍♀️官方網站:https://www.fb664.com

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @yy98827. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 705,241 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🥇東京.大阪恩客真實點評” (@yy98827), 31 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yy98827.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.