Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Владимир Зудов

@zudovvs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

627subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001639747314
TypeChannel
Username@zudovvs
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zudovvs

Growth

6276296287 August 2026 — 629 subscribers8 August 2026 — 629 subscribers8 August 2026 — 628 subscribers15 August 2026 — 627 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 627–629 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:14627-1
8 Aug 2026, 03:11628-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:50629no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:09629first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
563.6%
avg views ÷ 627 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,530
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.745%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (14 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total10,602
Reactions total79
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

218 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12758.3%
🔥4621.1%
👍3013.8%
😁104.59%
💯31.38%
❤‍🔥20.917%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 16 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zudovvs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC102 views4 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Greenura — органическое удобрение 5 в 1 для всех видов растений Greenura — комплексное органическое удобрение нового поколения для сада, огорода, комнатных растений, цветов, овощей, ягод, плодовых деревьев и кустарников. https://t.me/progreenura

👍31

18 Jul 2026, 21:58 UTC600 views30 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Сейчас летел в самолете и там процентов 30, а то и 50 детей разных возрастов. Все бегали, шумели, кричали. Мои милые птиродактели.)) Насколько это естественно видеть вокруг детей, слышать их крики. Я летел с улыбкой на лице.)))

30

18 Jul 2026, 21:41 UTC≈9,900 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Знаете что заметил, немало сейчас людей, особенно молодых стали путать две вещи. Охрана своих личных границ и ответственность. Говнограмм этому учит или психолухи не пойму. Но ты просишь доделать отчет в нерабочее время, даже в выходные, а тебе заявляют, что выходные это личное время сотрудника и нельзя мешать работу и дом. Да никто не просит ничего мешать, но ведь ты же знал сроки и знал важность, но не сделал в с

27👍18

15 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTC596 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, привет! С 25 июля по 2 августа Прорыв Travel отправляется в 9-дневную экспедицию на Камчатку в окружении предпринимателей Отдых с людьми, которые понимают ваш ритм, нагрузку и желание наконец-то нормально выдохнуть В программе: → сафари по Тихому океану и возможность увидеть косаток; → гастро-обед на Халактырском пляже; → восхождение на горы и вулканы; → рыбалка и ужин на катере от шеф-повара; → знакомство

4

15 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC428 views4 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💯21🔥1

11 Jul 2026, 14:03 UTC428 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мальчик заблудился в лесу. Он был в отчаянии, почти плакал. Но потом взял себя в руки, осмелел, залез на большое дерево и увидел свой путь.

🔥98

8 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC505 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @temalebedev

Люди вырастают Дети рано или поздно вырастут и станут взрослыми. А когда дети вырастут, они реально станут взрослыми. Они больше не будут срать в штаны, плакать, у них появится своя жизнь и свое мнение. Родителям важно не пропустить этот момент. И не продолжать общаться со взрослыми людьми как с детьми. Кстати, ровно то же верно по отношению к одноклассникам, которые не обязаны всю жизнь соответствовать школьным

7🔥5

28 Jun 2026, 14:52 UTC572 views27 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нахожусь сейчас в небольшой мотопоездке. Ехали сегодня по дороге от Минска до Мирского замка. Доехали. Мой друг подходит и говорит мне: «Мы с тобой вот ехали по дороге сейчас, как она тебе?» Да хорошо. На первый взгляд дорога идеальная. Ровная прямая трасса, ни одной ямы. Друг задает второй вопрос: «А было ли тебе интересно по ней ехать?» Нет. Хотя ведь дорога была идеальной. Неожиданно. И тут я понял, к чему ве

20👍7

26 Jun 2026, 10:09 UTC454 views24 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как вам образ?)))

🔥175❤‍🔥2

25 Jun 2026, 05:42 UTC431 views7 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Александр Малашкин сказал: всего две вещи любовь и работа это основа развития. Всех любишь и много работаешь.

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @zudovvs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,243,023 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Владимир Зудов” (@zudovvs), 627 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zudovvs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.