Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Діма 🇬🇧 НМТ англійська

Channel

Діма 🇬🇧 НМТ англійська

@znohub_eng

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

40,929subscribers

+1,008 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001435875717
TypeChannel
Username@znohub_eng
Description🖇️7-й рік готую до ЗНО/НМТ 🖇️228 двохсотбальників 🖇️ особисто двічі склав на 200 👇🏻Забронюй курс «2027» за найнижчою ціною: https://t.me/znohub_sales_bot?start=english_2027
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/znohub_eng

Growth

39,92140,92940,4257 August 2026 — 39,921 subscribers7 August 2026 — 39,921 subscribers7 August 2026 — 39,935 subscribers8 August 2026 — 39,972 subscribers9 August 2026 — 40,002 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,060 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,089 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,252 subscribers13 August 2026 — 40,289 subscribers15 August 2026 — 40,384 subscribers16 August 2026 — 40,444 subscribers17 August 2026 — 40,516 subscribers18 August 2026 — 40,651 subscribers20 August 2026 — 40,668 subscribers21 August 2026 — 40,719 subscribers22 August 2026 — 40,748 subscribers24 August 2026 — 40,789 subscribers25 August 2026 — 40,735 subscribers26 August 2026 — 40,766 subscribers27 August 2026 — 40,802 subscribers27 August 2026 — 40,889 subscribers28 August 2026 — 40,929 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 21 days, net +1,008. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,770–41,080 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 22:2740,929+40
27 Aug 2026, 23:5640,889+87
27 Aug 2026, 00:2840,802+36
26 Aug 2026, 02:2840,766+31
25 Aug 2026, 05:4740,735-54
24 Aug 2026, 04:0540,789+41
22 Aug 2026, 12:1840,748+29
21 Aug 2026, 00:5440,719+51
20 Aug 2026, 01:4240,668+17
18 Aug 2026, 22:5740,651+135
17 Aug 2026, 20:4640,516+72
16 Aug 2026, 16:4540,444+60
15 Aug 2026, 02:5640,384+95
13 Aug 2026, 18:1840,289+37
12 Aug 2026, 19:0640,252+163
11 Aug 2026, 16:1540,089+29
10 Aug 2026, 13:4140,060+58
9 Aug 2026, 14:2140,002+30
8 Aug 2026, 15:4439,972+37
7 Aug 2026, 19:0439,935first reading

Engagement

203 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.58%
avg views ÷ 40,929 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,920
203 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
203
of 203 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held203 (5 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total795,970
Reactions total15,665
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,920
Videos
265
Links
1,430

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 47s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

15,665 reactions across 203 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9,24359.0%
😭2,34515.0%
💯8445.39%
🔥7274.64%
😢7164.57%
🥰6284.01%
👍4682.99%
2201.40%
💅2201.40%
🤔830.53%
🦄590.377%
😱580.37%
👏320.204%
🎄140.089%
👻50.032%
🎃30.019%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 203 of the 203 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,665reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 203 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC≈3,310 views23 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Прийдете?

  1. Прийду62%
  2. Не знаю38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23

28 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC≈3,190 views51 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Прям ну сильне заняття, зекономить вам багато часу, бо в школі таке можна вчити роками

481👍1🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC≈3,340 views72 reactionsread 29 August 2026

НЕДІЛЯ 19:30⏰ 🎯Все про часи за одне заняття 🖇️ Заняття базується на практиці + теорії вже у процесі виконання тестів 🖇️ Будуть пісні, щоб побачити використання різних часів в реальній англ і краще запамʼятати емоціями; 🖇️ Багато правил, логіка та алгоритм виконання тестів НЕ буде пасивного стану, це на окремому занятті Важливо✍️ 👉Хто долучається - отримає подарунок, шпаргалку з вижимкою правил, прикладів, винятків

701🥰1

28 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC≈3,050 views52 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Добрий день, солоденькі Буду вам розказувати про безкоштовне заняття

46👍5🦄1

28 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC≈3,590 views51 reactionsread 29 August 2026

#Вокабчик День № 15 1️⃣ reassuring 📍Заспокійливий, такий, що додає впевненості 👨‍💻Синоніми: comforting, encouraging ✍️Приклад: It was reassuring to know that everything was under control. 2️⃣ unpredictable 📍Непередбачуваний 👨‍💻Синоніми: uncertain, changeable ✍️Приклад: The weather has been extremely unpredictable lately. 3️⃣ efficient 📍Ефективний, продуктивний 👨‍💻Синоніми: productive, effective ✍️Приклад: We need

46🦄4👍1

27 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC≈3,520 views133 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Як результати? Впоралися?🤔

62😢29👍19💯17🤔51

27 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC≈3,410 views34 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

4.

  1. Since10%
  2. For83%
  3. In5%
  4. At2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24😭81🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC≈3,100 views31 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

3.

  1. intention21%
  2. intentional14%
  3. intentionally62%
  4. intent3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21🤔81🥰1

27 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC≈3,130 views33 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

2.

  1. To write81%
  2. Write6%
  3. Written8%
  4. To be writing5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28👍2🤔21

27 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC≈3,490 views61 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

1.

  1. Another57%
  2. Other21%
  3. The other18%
  4. Others4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😭4910😢2

27 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC≈3,900 views22 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Leonardo da Vinci wasn’t just an incredible artist; he was an inventor, scientist, mathematician, engineer, writer, musician and much more. Leonardo da Vinci could write with one hand and draw with (1) … at the same time. He used (2) … backwards, one requires a mirror to read his writings. He did this (3) … as he wanted to keep his thoughts secret from the others. Leonardo da Vinci worked on painting Mona Lisa (4) …

16💅51

Showing the 12 most recent of 203 posts we hold for @znohub_eng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 80 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTCAnonymous Poll909 voters

Прийдете?

  1. Прийду62%
  2. Не знаю38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,210 voters approx.

4.

  1. Since10%
  2. For83%
  3. In5%
  4. At2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,240 voters approx.

3.

  1. intention21%
  2. intentional14%
  3. intentionally62%
  4. intent3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,350 voters approx.

2.

  1. To write81%
  2. Write6%
  3. Written8%
  4. To be writing5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,480 voters approx.

1.

  1. Another57%
  2. Other21%
  3. The other18%
  4. Others4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,780 voters approx.

We need to take all the relevant factors into ___ before making a final decision.

  1. Attention33%
  2. Sight13%
  3. Thought12%
  4. Consideration42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 203 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Катя 🇺🇦 НМТ українська
@znohub_ukr · 45,565
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Крістіна 📈 НМТ математика
@znohub_math · 50,555
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
Яніна ⏳ НМТ історія
@znohub_hist · 64,963
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
Вступ.ОСВІТА.UA️⚡2026
@vstuposvita · 113,080
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
Вступ 2026⚡️Live
@vstup · 42,975
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Діма 🇬🇧 НМТ англійська” (@znohub_eng), 40,929 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/znohub_eng.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.