дуже цікава ваша думка щодо цього, можете написати і ті, хто вже пройшов досвід складання НМТ☝🏼

Channel
ProMaths
@proomaths
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Cite this entry
17,717subscribers
-1,154 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001654770860 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @proomaths |
| Description | PROматематики готують до НМТ @maksimnynyk @nynyknastya |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/proomaths |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 17,717 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 17,728 | -31 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 17,759 | -27 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 17,786 | -43 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 17,829 | -52 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 17,881 | -176 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 18,057 | -206 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 18,263 | -85 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 18,348 | -73 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 18,421 | -51 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 18,472 | -114 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 18,586 | -246 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 18,832 | -39 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 18,871 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 18,871 | first reading |
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.8%
- avg views ÷ 17,717 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,690
- 49 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.648%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 51
- of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 46 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 56 (19 July 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 180,580 |
| Reactions total | 1,132 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 22:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 887
- Videos
- 110
- Links
- 459
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 43s
- Average length
- 26s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,522 reactions across 51 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 624 | 41.0% | |
| 🔥 | 316 | 20.8% | |
| 👍 | 222 | 14.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 125 | 8.21% | |
| 💘 | 74 | 4.86% | |
| 👎 | 32 | 2.10% | |
| 🥰 | 32 | 2.10% | |
| ⚡ | 19 | 1.25% | |
| 💋 | 19 | 1.25% | |
| 🍓 | 16 | 1.05% | |
| 🕊 | 14 | 0.92% | |
| 😭 | 8 | 0.526% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.197% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.197% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 0.131% | |
| 🙊 | 2 | 0.131% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 0.131% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.131% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.066% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.066% | |
| 5 further kinds | 5 | 0.329% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,522reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 54 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @proomaths. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 56 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
ЧОМУ «ВЧИТИ МАТЕМАТИКУ» ≠ «СКЛАСТИ НМТ»? 🧠❌ (БАТЬКАМ І УЧНЯМ БАЗА ПРО ПІДГОТОВКУ ДО НМТ) По факту, результат НМТ - це 1 число, після його проходження🙂. Нікому не буде цікаво: "Чи шарите ви в математиці?" "Чи вивчили ви 50 чи 500 тем?" "Чи проходили ви імітації?" Чи заслуговували ви на 180, а отримали 140( Тут найголовніше зрозуміти: НМТ - це окремий челендж зі своїми правилами🤯. Це не просто математика, це конкрет…
❤9
сьогодні стрімичик в тіктоці десь в 18:00, вилазимо з басейнів
🔥6😢3
отакі от новини від нового міністра освіти, як і казали, що зміни якісь будуть, але питання обов'язквості вже не стоїть чекаємо офіційної інфи, але здогадки про зміни такі 1) зимня сесія, для тих, хто не склав влітку 2) можливо формат 2 днів, можливе розділення на профільну і стандартну математику особисто, напевно хотілось би профіль і стандарт, але мені здається, що до таких серйозних змін вони не готові, а буде…
❤45👍9❤🔥1
Протягом року все з вами розберемо і функції і параметри і все-все, а поки літіч, то супер не хочется чогось складного😁
👍5❤2
Готуємось до вебчику на вихідних, допоможіть з вибором теми👋 Бачили, що багатьох зацікавили на міні курсі логарифми, то може б ми вже їх до кінця добили?🥹 ПОКИ ІНШІ ПЛАВАЮТЬ В БАСЕЙНІ))) P.S. якщо ви плаваєте в басейні, то пишіть інші варіанти💬
❤7🔥4
багато в інсті вже показували апгрейдів курсу, а якось до телеграму руки не доходять, тому будемо показувати тут частіше всіляки фішки😊
👍6🔥3❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥3
дуже дякуємо всім за фідбекіч, зрозуміли, що вам буде дуже корисно, тому подумаємо як це зробити ще цікавіше🤝
❤1
супер важливе питання життя і математики, треба ваша допомога🥹
🔥24❤3
+ як ми казали на хайп кемпичі, ми хочемо максимально приділити увагу кожному учню річного курсу і дати особисту підтримку, тому маємо обмежити кількість місць до 150 зараз вже маємо 48 оплачених місць і десь 20 під передплатою
❤4
👑 ЧОМУ САМЕ НА РІЧНОМУ КУРСІ УЧНІ РОБЛЯТЬ МАКСИМАЛЬНИЙ ПРОГРЕС? Тетяна: з 130 до 180 балів (+50 балів!) ✨ Прийшла у вересні з хаосом та не розуміла, за що хапатися. Завдяки структурованій програмі, поясненням «людською мовою» та дружній атмосфері забрала свої 180 балів🤙 Олександра: з 2/32 на першому пробнику до 145 балів (+45 балів!) 🎉 У серпні написала свій перший тестовий пробник на 2 бали з 32. Була в розпачі, а…
❤5👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @proomaths. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@proomaths edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 16 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 17 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
чо ми хочемо сьодні чілловий стрімчик в тіктоці?😎
- таааак🔥38%
- ніііі🥹18%
- я в басейні29%
- я на шашликах39%
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Який рівень математики у вас зараз?🫣 (якщо ви НМТ-2027)
- не набираю прохідний (все погано)9%
- 100-130 (потенціал)16%
- 130-160 (жостік)25%
- 160+ (талант)18%
- не НМТ-202732%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ProMaths” (@proomaths), 17,717 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proomaths.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.