Channel
@zno_with_anzhela
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
897subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001576619156 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zno_with_anzhela |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zno_with_anzhela |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 897 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 897 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 August 2025 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,471 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
80 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 69 | 86.3% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 10.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 3.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2025 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ГАЙД З КОРИСНИМИ ВІДЕО ТА УРОКАМИ🫢 на моєму каналі 📌функції на НМТ https://t.me/zno_with_anzhela/484 📌системи рівнянь https://t.me/zno_with_anzhela/1283 📌циліндр https://t.me/zno_with_anzhela/1294 📌первісна https://t.me/zno_with_anzhela/1332 📌теорема Вієта https://t.me/zno_with_anzhela/568 📌розбір типового варіанту НМТ https://t.me/zno_with_anzhela/521 📌розбір демо версії НМТ 2024 https://t.me/zno_with_anzhela…
❤6
АНЖЕЛА📚НМТ МАТЕМАТИКА pinned «ГАЙД З КОРИСНИМИ ВІДЕО ТА УРОКАМИ🫢 на моєму каналі 📌функції на НМТ https://t.me/zno_with_anzhela/484 📌системи рівнянь https://t.me/zno_with_anzhela/1283 📌циліндр https://t.me/zno_with_anzhela/1294 📌первісна https://t.me/zno_with_anzhela/1332 📌теорема…»
Перекличка майбутніх НМТ-шників Ставте + в коментарях, будемо знайомитися
❤6
Що вас чекає: -тести -лайфхаки для НМТ -безкоштовні уроки -користав матеріали для підготовки
❤4
Тут я планую викладати контент для 10-11 класу і тих, хто готується до НМТ з математики
❤4
Мене рік тут не було і ось я повертаюся😃 Хочу дізнатися, хто у мене тут є
Хто ви?)
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Сьогодні о 20:00 прямий ефір в Тік ток, розбираємо цьогорічне НМТ ❤️
❤7
Планую сьогодні о 16:30 провести пробний перший ефір в Тік-ток, розберемо якийсь з цьогорічних варіантів https://www.tiktok.com/@zno_with_anzh?_t=ZM-8zAkr0Rc11s&_r=1
❤5🔥1
Якщо ви ще сумніваєтеся чи підійде вам такий формат, пишіть «урок» мені в інстаграм і я скину вам пробний урок з минулого річного курсу 📚 https://www.instagram.com/zno_with_anzh?igsh=Y2lwNjRobzFybWI5&utm_source=qr
❤1🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤6❤🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zno_with_anzhela. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Хто ви?)
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2025 to 21 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АНЖЕЛА📚НМТ МАТЕМАТИКА” (@zno_with_anzhela), 897 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zno_with_anzhela.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.