Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 30% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 674 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
123 measurements spanning 96 days, net -1,001. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 78,123–79,530 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 123
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 09:39
78,367
+7
10 Nov 2026, 03:48
78,360
+71
8 Nov 2026, 23:16
78,289
no change
8 Nov 2026, 20:11
78,289
-75
7 Nov 2026, 13:01
78,364
-17
7 Nov 2026, 12:10
78,381
-73
6 Nov 2026, 12:00
78,454
no change
6 Nov 2026, 11:09
78,454
+66
5 Nov 2026, 14:59
78,388
-2
5 Nov 2026, 08:41
78,390
+45
4 Nov 2026, 11:57
78,345
no change
4 Nov 2026, 09:09
78,345
+60
3 Nov 2026, 13:37
78,285
no change
3 Nov 2026, 08:31
78,285
-58
2 Nov 2026, 13:29
78,343
-19
2 Nov 2026, 04:59
78,362
-105
1 Nov 2026, 12:08
78,467
-1
1 Nov 2026, 02:46
78,468
-39
31 Oct 2026, 15:27
78,507
+90
31 Oct 2026, 01:30
78,417
first reading
Engagement
767 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 258 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.47%
avg views ÷ 78,367 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,290
236 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
236
of 767 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
767 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
1,012,325
Reactions total
23,300
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 07:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈20,700
Videos
≈582
Links
≈18,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 42s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
67,842 reactions across 758 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
16,431
24.2%
👍
13,699
20.2%
😱
9,737
14.4%
🔥
6,678
9.84%
🤯
3,925
5.79%
🥴
3,234
4.77%
❤🔥
2,377
3.50%
😭
2,065
3.04%
💯
1,698
2.50%
😍
1,688
2.49%
😁
1,334
1.97%
👌
1,108
1.63%
🥰
900
1.33%
🤗
832
1.23%
🙏
795
1.17%
😡
653
0.963%
💔
318
0.469%
🫡
173
0.255%
💋
67
0.099%
🌭
47
0.069%
2 further kinds
83
0.122%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 763 of the 767 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67,842 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 767 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 236 posts held from the last 30 days (1.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Чем старее яйцо, тем прозрачнее и водянистее его белок. Белок свежеотложенного яица густои и мутный, поскольку содержит углекислый газ, которыи в процессе хранения яйца медленно улетучивается через скорлупу.
Знаток💡
Интересный факт: в то время, когда человек находится в состоянии гипноза, у него пропадают аллергические реакции. Вывод напрашивается сам собой: аллергия зависит от человеческого сознания.
Знаток💡
🔞 В СССР строили особые школьные туалеты для девочек...
Как были шокированы учителя, когда узнали что в школьном туалете девочек изначально закладывали... Читать продолжение
Знакомьтесь, это Джонни Ким, который в детстве страдал от неуверенности в себе, но взял себя в руки и стал "морским котиком". Этого ему показалось мало и он решил стать врачом, окончив Гарвард. А позже Джонни попробовал свои силы в NASА и его отобрали из более чем 18000 претендентов. Теперь он ожидает свой полёт в космос.
Знаток💡
Американский лесничий Рой Салливан пережил семь ударов молнии в период с 1942 по 1977 год.
Молнии сжигали ему волосы, брови и одежду, оставляя серьёзные ожоги. Однажды волосы загорелись прямо во время работы. Но мужчина пережил все семь ударов и попал в Книгу рекордов Гиннесса.
Знаток💡
В 1978 году советский физик Анатолий Бугорский случайно подставил голову под мощный пучок протонов, двигавшихся почти со скоростью света.
Луч прошёл через его череп и мозг. Врачи ожидали смерти учёного, но он выжил и даже продолжил научную карьеру. Правда, половина лица осталась парализованной.
Знаток💡
В 2007 году Брэд Питт построил 150 домов для людей пострадавших от урагана – в итоге люди начали жаловаться на некачественное жилье и суд обязал актера выплатить 20,5 млн долларов
Знаток💡
В Италии арестовали мужчину, которые 10 лет получал пенсию по слепоте и выманил у властей €160 000. А спалился он на том, что водил машину.
Знаток💡
🤗58👍14😱12🔥7❤4🥴3
Showing the 12 most recent of 767 posts we hold for @znatok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@znatok edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
1 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 97 posts on @znatok as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
35 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
22
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Жуткие факты @scary_facts11 · 181,706 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
ЧЁ по ЧЁМ @chpch0 · 32,602 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 4 September 2026
Интересный уголок @poznavation · 33,252 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 September 2026
Всезнайка @vseznayu · 22,494 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 September 2026
Знайка | Факты обо всём @znaika_fact · 21,197 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
Это факт @etofackt · 242,647 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
Эрудит @Braintorn · 37,649 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
Мозговой штурм - загадки и викторины @TriviaGames · 23,296 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
Наука дня | Факты @sciensday · 55,576 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
Анекдоты | Мемы | Юмор 🍒 @a_necdot69 · 131,003 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 13 August 2026
Интересные факты @interesnie_fac · 154,024 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 August 2026
Интересные факты @Fact_Interes · 27,157 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
Олени на Дорогах @pddolen · 19,966 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 27 September 2026
Математика | Опросы @mathematics_channeI · 25,251 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 September 2026
ЧЁ по ОПРОСАМ @chpch3 · 26,966 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 10 September 2026
Black History @history_0x · 42,459 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
Удивительный Мир 🌍 @divo_planeta · 21,491 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 September 2026
Книга Знаний @book_know · 71,141 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
☠ Святой ☠ @geografiyatg · 54 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
Тайная История @secrethIstory12 · 21,656 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 September 2026
ДТП @anti_dtp · 18,886 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 3 October 2026
Увлекательные задачки! Ребусы и головоломки. @golovorebus · 56,408 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
ЧЁ по ФАКТАМ @chpch2 · 28,547 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 8 September 2026
MATEMATIKA🧠 @mathrus3 · 54,747 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 58 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Знаток” (@znatok), 78,367 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/znatok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
