Channel
@AmazingFakts100
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3,136subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002130413091 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AmazingFakts100 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AmazingFakts100 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 3,136 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 3,146 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 3,146 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 710 |
| Reactions total | 38 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
38 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 19 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 47.4% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤⭐️ Вы никогда не касаетесь ничего. И вот почему это удивительно. То, что вы считали касанием, — это иллюзия. Хорошо поставленная нейробиологией, но физически — неверная. Что такое «касание» с точки зрения физики? Атомы состоят из ядра и электронов, которые постоянно движутся и занимают «свою» область пространства. Когда ваша рука «подходит» к столу, происходит вот что: 1️⃣Электроны на поверхности вашей руки …
Что произойдёт, если атомы вашей руки действительно соприкоснутся с атомами стола?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥1
🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Прямо сейчас ваша рука «лежит» на столе. Или вы держите телефон. Или сидите на стуле. Но с точки зрения физики — вы не касаетесь ни одного из этих предметов. Атомы, из которых состоит ваше тело, и атомы, из которых состоит стол, никогда не соприкасаются. Между ними всегда есть расстояние. Невидимая прослойка, которая разделяет вас и весь мир вокруг. Причина — электромагнитное от…
🔥1
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Представьте: сознание проснулось, а мышцы ещё спят. Только не в прямом смысле «спят», а заблокированы. Вы — живая статуя в собственной спальне. А мозг, пытаясь объяснить эту ситуацию, начинает дорисовывать реальность. Что такое сонный паралич с точки зрения нейробиологии? Во время REM-сна мозг активен как при бодрствовании, но мышцы парализованы — это защитный механизм, чтобы мы не двигались во сне …
👍1🔥1
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Вы просыпаетесь, но не можете пошевелиться. Глаза открыты. Вы слышите звуки, видите комнату — и вдруг замечаете тёмный силуэт в углу. Вы пытаетесь закричать — но не можете даже открыть рот. На грудь давит тяжесть, вы задыхаетесь. Вы парализованы. Это — сонный паралич. Его испытывают около 10% населения . Состояние длится от нескольких секунд до 2–3 минут, но оно кажется вечностью . А самое пугающ…
👍1🔥1
Как называется состояние, когда человек бодрствует, но его мышцы парализованы из-за перехода между сном и бодрствованием?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1🔥1
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 которая существует. Что скрывается за «ничем»? С точки зрения классической физики, вакуум — это абсолютная пустота. Но квантовая механика разрушила это представление. Сегодня мы знаем: пустота — это самое бурлящее место во Вселенной. Как рождаются частицы «из ничего»? Всё дело в принципе неопределённости Гейзенберга. Он утверждает, что на очень коротких промежутках времени энергия не обязана быть равна нулю…
👍1🔥1
Как называется сила, возникающая между двумя металлическими пластинами в вакууме из-за квантовых флуктуаций?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1🔥1
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 которая кипит Что такое вакуум? Для обычного человека — это абсолютная пустота. Ничего нет. Ни атомов, ни света, ни воздуха. Для квантового физика — это самое бурлящее место во Вселенной. Согласно квантовой теории, даже в идеальном вакууме постоянно рождаются и исчезают виртуальные частицы — пары «частица-античастица», которые возникают из ниоткуда и тут же аннигилируют . Этот процесс называется квантовыми…
👍1🔥1
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Учёные из Университета Лозанны и Научно-технологического института Окинавы провели эксперимент: они травмировали ноги муравьям и заражали раны бактерией Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Половину муравьёв оставили в изоляции, другую половину — подсадили к сородичам. Результаты поразили исследователей. Когда муравьи делают ампутацию? При травме бедра муравьи-хирурги сначала очищали рану, затем полност…
👍1🔥1
Почему при травме голени муравьи НЕ делают ампутацию, а при травме бедра — делают?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1🔥1
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Представьте: вы получили тяжёлую травму ноги. Если не вмешаться — инфекция убьёт вас за сутки. Кто-то должен отрезать вам ногу. И этот кто-то — ваш товарищ по муравейнику. В 2024 году учёные из Швейцарии и Японии сделали открытие: флоридские муравьи-плотники (Camponotus floridanus) проводят настоящие хирургические операции . Они диагностируют травму, определяют, где повреждение, и выбирают метод …
👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AmazingFakts100. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что произойдёт, если атомы вашей руки действительно соприкоснутся с атомами стола?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как называется состояние, когда человек бодрствует, но его мышцы парализованы из-за перехода между сном и бодрствованием?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как называется сила, возникающая между двумя металлическими пластинами в вакууме из-за квантовых флуктуаций?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Почему при травме голени муравьи НЕ делают ампутацию, а при травме бедра — делают?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как вы думаете, почему атомные часы на вершине горы идут быстрее, чем на уровне моря?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какова, по оценкам учёных, средняя температура плазмы внутри шаровой молнии?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,368,912 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Удивительные Факты⚡️” (@AmazingFakts100), 3,136 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AmazingFakts100.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.