Channel
@experimentynagrani
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,040subscribers
+805 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004323066715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @experimentynagrani |
| Created | 16 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/experimentynagrani |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 1,040 | +805 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 235 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 16 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,938 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
21 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 85.7% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Эксперимент Гарлоу с изоляцией обезьян (1950-е) 🧠 Цель: Определить значение материнской любви и прикосновений для выживания. ⚗️ Суть эксперимента: Обезьянам предлагали два "матери-манекена" — один тёплый и мягкий, но без еды, второй — металлический с бутылочкой. Они предпочитали мягкого, даже голодая. 📌 Выяснилось: Тактильный контакт важнее еды — эмоциональная близость жизненно необходима.
❤4
Джемовый парадокс выбора (2000 г.) 🧠 Цель: Исследовать, как количество вариантов влияет на принятие решений. ⚗️ Суть эксперимента: Люди выбирали джем из 6 вкусов и из 24. При большом выборе почти никто не покупал, при малом — покупали чаще. В контексте маркетинга, парадокс выбора указывает на то, что увеличение ассортимента не всегда приводит к росту продаж. 📌 Выяснилось: Чем больше вариантов, тем меньше шансов на…
❤3👍1
Зеркальная терапия фантомной боли (1990-е) 🧠 Цель: Найти способ облегчения фантомной боли у ампутантов. ⚗️ Суть эксперимента: Пациент смотрел на отражение своей здоровой руки в зеркале, создавая иллюзию, что у него есть обе конечности. При движении уменьшалась боль. 📌 Выяснилось: Визуальный обман помогает мозгу «поверить», что боли нет — и симптомы ослабевают.
🧪 Эксперимент: Оргазм длиной в 3 дня Место: Частная нейролаборатория (1987 год) Объект: Женщина, 28 лет, доброволец Метод: Стимуляция гипоталамуса и поясной извилины слабым электротоком Цель: Выяснить предел непрерывного сексуального возбуждения 🕐 Первые минуты: 00:00 — Старт стимуляции. Пациентка смеётся, ощущает лёгкую эйфорию. Показатели ЧСС и пульса — в норме. 00:04 — Первый оргазм. Вызван слабыми пульсациями. …
❤4
Эксперимент с изоляцией времени (Deep Time, 2021 г.) 🧠 Цель: Понять, как человек воспринимает время без внешних ориентиров. ⚗️ Суть эксперимента: 15 человек жили в пещере 40 дней без часов, света, связи и календаря. Один участник прожил 74 дня, думая, что прошло около 30. 📌 Выяснилось: Без контакта с внешним миром мозг теряет способность отслеживать течение времени.
Эксперимент Милгрэма (1961 г.) 🧠 Цель: Исследовать, насколько человек готов подчиняться авторитету, причиняя вред. ⚗️ Суть эксперимента: Участникам давали команду "бить током" другого человека за ошибки. На самом деле, разряды были фальшивыми, а "жертва" — актёром. 📌 Выяснилось: 65% участников дошли до максимального уровня «наказания». Люди склонны подчиняться, даже если это причиняет вред другим.
❤1
Полная статья: https://telegra.ph/EHksperiment-Orgazm-dlinoj-v-3-dnya-06-28
❤3
Проект MK-Ultra (ЦРУ, 1953–1973) 🧠 Цель: Разработка методов контроля над сознанием с помощью психотропных веществ. ⚗️ Суть эксперимента: Без согласия людей им давали ЛСД, подвергали допросам и сенсорной депривации. Эксперименты проходили в тайне в психбольницах, тюрьмах и университетах. 📌 Выяснилось: Некоторые испытуемые навсегда теряли связь с реальностью. Многие материалы были уничтожены. Программа признана неза…
❤1
Эксперимент с моралью младенцев (Йельский университет, 2010 г.) 🧠 Цель: Понять, врождена ли мораль у человека или формируется позже. ⚗️ Суть эксперимента: Детям до года показывали сценки, где одна кукла помогала другой, а вторая — мешала. Затем ребёнку предлагали выбрать между двумя куклами. 98% тянулись к "доброй". 📌 Выяснилось: Даже младенцы инстинктивно тянутся к добру — базовая мораль может быть врождённой.
❤2
Стэнфордский тюремный эксперимент (1971 г.) 🧠 Цель: Изучить, как быстро власть и подчинение меняют поведение людей. ⚗️ Суть эксперимента: Добровольцев разделили на "охранников" и "заключённых", поселив в подвал, имитирующий тюрьму. "Охранники" получили почти неограниченные полномочия. Уже на 2-й день начались издевательства и унижения. Эксперимент остановили на 6-й день из 14 запланированных. 📌 Выяснилось: Люди бы…
🕊2
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @experimentynagrani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 142,784 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эксперименты на грани” (@experimentynagrani), 1,040 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/experimentynagrani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.