Channel
@zimo8885
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001519871227 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zimo8885 |
| Created | 5 October 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zimo8885 |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 2 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 5 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2022 to 7 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/Dfvffdf88 https://t.me/nidongde2022 https://t.me/KaorouC40 https://t.me/LWL332 https://t.me/Gschaguan https://t.me/xiuchezonbu https://t.me/Nanshanali666 https://t.me/sz5667 https://t.me/szcslrzq https://t.me/zzaa9455
https://t.me/chaopaohui https://t.me/linwuqun01 https://t.me/zx0011 https://t.me/hghxtsh https://t.me/danai5200 https://t.me/yyyyouyou https://t.me/saolei_sapper https://t.me/szww568
https://t.me/szzchun https://t.me/sanshengYX https://t.me/AGashdsa https://t.me/szzzzz0 https://t.me/HongXiouge https://t.me/pwq19900 https://t.me/gsjl168 https://t.me/langyou798 https://t.me/gssy100
https://t.me/siyue_666 https://t.me/SZLHMYY614614 https://t.me/szcx0755A https://t.me/Sz1888 https://t.me/guangzhouchashequ https://t.me/H1341554
https://t.me/ohf56 https://t.me/sxy68899 https://t.me/szqiyanfenshe https://t.me/qgky8888 https://t.me/szqmjiaoliu https://t.me/anran111888
https://t.me/shenzhen911 https://t.me/szgz12345 https://t.me/sdssz1 https://t.me/sharedGirlsTalk https://t.me/zhazhishenzhen https://t.me/linxi1995 https://t.me/sz366
🔥1
https://t.me/a45354656 https://t.me/yinshinannv66 https://t.me/anmo123456 https://t.me/szxiuche007 https://t.me/szhechaba https://t.me/shenzhen_goodcar
https://t.me/caifa6688 https://t.me/laoniu118 https://t.me/szyh520 https://t.me/loufengziyuan https://t.me/cctvgf1 https://t.me/QGKDLKZJ88888888 https://t.me/caxingchalou123
https://t.me/waiweiziy https://t.me/ohf56 https://t.me/chongqing_goodcar https://t.me/szshuiguo111 https://t.me/GSaiyu https://t.me/guanggzhou https://t.me/szbbc
https://t.me/yhy52188888888 https://t.me/szlxy122 https://t.me/ghxtgqd https://t.me/ak3836 https://t.me/nenmei1 https://t.me/FL1699 https://t.me/leilasz002
https://t.me/shenzhen157 https://t.me/keyusj6611 https://t.me/jizhongying567 https://t.me/Ashenzhen https://t.me/guangzhouxiuche3 https://t.me/shenzhenxiuche88 https://t.me/guangdos875875
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @zimo8885. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,280,161 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@zimo8885 named 19 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“群分享频道” (@zimo8885), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zimo8885.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.