Channel
@szzzzz0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
6,709subscribers
+938 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001965542804 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @szzzzz0 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/szzzzz0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 6,709 | -20 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 6,729 | +960 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 5,769 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 5,771 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 5,771 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (7 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,888 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @szzzzz0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
szyj #深圳洋马俄罗斯 深圳洋酒外教俄罗斯🇷🇺03 净身高/ 173• 𝐖𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭体重/49KG • 𝐁𝐮𝐬𝐭胸围/D• 𝐀𝐠𝐞年龄20岁 Service 服务/🉑 6.9/ 🉑 kiss💋/🈚 🍑口 ，丝袜，制服，本人完美身材，娃娃脸，白皮肤，精致五官，熊大腰细，大长🦵，天然蜜🍑臀，性格热情❤️🔥，活泼主动。不事不催配合度高。 —————————————— 🎚频道导航🎚 聊天大群 —————————————— 😬在线客服 @fengsuge 😬双向客服 @fengsugebot
❤1
szyj #深圳洋马白俄罗斯 深圳洋酒外教洋妞白俄罗斯🇧🇾07 净身高/ 170• 𝐖𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭体重/54• 𝐁𝐮𝐬𝐭胸围/D• 𝐀𝐠𝐞年龄，19岁. Service 服务🉑 6.9/ 🉑 kiss💋/🈚 🍑口 ，丝袜，制服，本人完美身材，娃娃脸，白皮肤，精致五官，完美身材比例，天然蜜🍑臀，性格热情❤️🔥，活泼主动。不事不催配合度高。 —————————————— 🎚频道导航🎚 聊天大群 —————————————— 😬在线客服 @fengsuge 😬双向客服 @fengsugebot
❤1🔥1
sz130 #深圳高端外围 #2500p 🉑舌吻 69 按摩 鸳鸯浴 调情 qj式爱爱 fw❣️Age/年龄08❣️sheng身高/162❣️Bust/胸围/C ❣️ Weight/体重/46KG ❣️刚毕业,大学生专业会计 ❣️本人听话有耐心，嘴甜会夸😁 ❣️皮肤细腻 滑嫩 ❣️身体柔软 配合默契度极高 ❣️温柔可爱L c初恋女友感声音好听：真人真照 ❣️司验证jia赔❣️禁🐱本人资料 —————————————— 🎚频道导航🎚 聊天大群 —————————————— 😬在线客服 @fengsuge 😬双向客服 @fengsugebot
关于大圈外围老师课表 以及和中圈老师的区别
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
sz482 #深圳模特🦜 #5000p 308号深圳南山李公子硬5中戏学生短暂停留｜T 台走秀｜时装模特｜｜签约达人｜平台博主｜｜身高180cm｜｜体重48kg｜｜🐻 D｜｜年龄 02年｜ 身材一流温柔好评选手 国际服装御用超模 2023浙江超模第3名 2024年某宝御用超模 2025年深大模特第2名 2025 广州时装周 —————————————— 🎚频道导航🎚 聊天大群 —————————————— 😬在线客服 @fengsuge 😬双向客服 @fengsugebot
sz481 #南山大学生 #2500p 深圳乐瑶🏠南山真实08，172cm 真实E 🉑69 蛇纹 在读兼职 全身雪白，本人真实照片，不网图，所见即所得 🎀模特身材 天使面容 千娇百媚 🎀敏感体质易高潮 体验感超棒 🎀自带仙女buff 擅聊天 高情商 🎀亭亭玉立 楚楚动人 落落大方 🎀皮肤光滑无纹身 大长腿A4腰比例美 🎀主动配合 女友约会般甜蜜感觉 —————————————— 🎚频道导航🎚 聊天大群 —————————————— 😬在线客服 @fengsuge 😬双向客服 @fengsugebot
sz480 #南山御姐 𝟏75e 天然🐻情商高.02 马甲线.s曲线穿着气质大牌 性格好 谈吐大方得体 多种剧情可解锁 蜜桃臀 气质御姐. 山东姑娘 网红主播 前凸后翘 性感撩人 保持健身 肤白貌美 —————————————— 🎚频道导航🎚 聊天大群 —————————————— 😬在线客服 @fengsuge 😬双向客服 @fengsugebot
sz474 #深圳转运珠 #3500p 深圳小七七（转运珠）🤰短暂停留 月底休 转运珠🤰孕6个月 保真可验 好运来 转运神器 05年 身高165 体重117斤 🐻c杯 皮肤细腻白皙 性格温柔 给您不一样的体验 —————————————— 🎚频道导航🎚 聊天大群 —————————————— 😬在线客服 @fengsuge 😬双向客服 @fengsugebot
sz473 #深圳大学生 #5000p 170D🦜05年（阿水） 甜美清纯天花板 短期圈外兼职 广州人 就读于深圳大学美术学院 双商极高 乖巧爱笑 前凸后翘 身材匀称皮肤好 邻家妹妹女友型 期待第一次见面 💜 —————————————— 🎚频道导航🎚 聊天大群 —————————————— 😬在线客服 @fengsuge 😬双向客服 @fengsugebot
sz472 #深圳南山空姐 #5000p 深圳空姐鹦鹉🦜• 𝐇𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭/ 170 • 𝐁𝐮𝐬𝐭/ C+ • 𝐀𝐠𝐞/ 02 偶尔兼职刚下💦 期待有缘人 𝙏𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙠𝙨 𝙮𝙤𝙪 •𝘽𝙤𝙨𝙨 💫💫💫 🌺高情商會來事 自带高级感 氣場十足 🌺活好不粘人 温柔 听话 懂事 耐心💯💯， 🌺人间妲己 温柔耐心 爱笑 🌺超敏感体质 一触即发可 请相信一定会给您带来终身难忘的邂逅 —————————————— 🎚频道导航🎚 聊天大群 —————————————— 😬在线客服 @fengsuge 😬双向客服 @fengsugebot
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @szzzzz0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
关于大圈外围老师课表 以及和中圈老师的区别
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,098,495 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳修车资源分享” (@szzzzz0), 6,709 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szzzzz0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.