Channel
@ziggsapp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
92subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002228035163 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ziggsapp |
| Created | 29 May 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ziggsapp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 92 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 91 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 91 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 29 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
⚡️ We’ve reached an excellent entry zone Over the past months, we’ve been working extensively on optimizing strategies using Ziggs indicators, and we’ll gradually start sharing them on this channel. But right now, something more important has happened. We’ve received a rather rare signal: [Global] Long Zigg at the 10% depth printed 100 — the maximum possible value for this indicator. Historically, such readings ma…
🔥 It has been around 9 hours since the [GLOBAL] Short Zigg signal. A number of altcoins showed only a minimal pullback and moved into consolidation. The key point is that the short-side imbalance on [Global] Short Zigg is not increasing — on the contrary, the long-side imbalance on [Global] Long Zigg continues to grow. We’d also like to remind that earlier today we observed a long-side imbalance that has never occu…
⚠️ A signal has appeared on [GLOBAL] Short Zigg at 5% depth You can see how it has been playing out recently on the ETH example in the screenshot above. We are partially closing our long positions — a correction or further downside is possible.
⚡️ We’re back to the usual mode Short imbalances on the [GLOBAL] Short Zigg indicator have been playing out with almost 100% accuracy over the past few months. ⚠️ Now the picture has completely changed: – we’re seeing extremely strong long imbalances on [GLOBAL] Long Zigg; – at 5% depth, the indicator value is 100 (the maximum) — we haven’t seen such levels even once over a full year of observations. For us, this…
❓ So, what played out after the [Global] Short Zigg signal? As expected, the rally slowed down: we saw a small consolidation and a local correction. When it comes to stronger altcoins, the global short-side imbalance had very little impact — BTC, ETH, SOL and BNB continued to rise significantly. But weaker coins reacted immediately: right after the [Global] Short Zigg spike, they moved into notable declines. We’ve …
✅ [Global] Long Zigg has already shown a solid reaction After our previous update, the market first dipped slightly and then moved higher: BTC +5%, ETH +6.5%, SOL +11% — measured from the moment of our post. Now we’re seeing a new spike on [Global] Short Zigg at the 5% depth. The chart shows how similar short-side imbalances have played out in the past. In this case, the appearance of [Global] Short Zigg doesn’t …
✅ As you can see, the decline has played out: BTC −6%, ETH −7.5%, SOL −9%. We highlighted the possibility of this move at the very beginning — right after the short-side imbalance appeared on [Global] Short Zigg. Now the picture has shifted: We’re seeing a long-side imbalance that hasn’t appeared since November 22. In such conditions the market usually shows at least a local rebound, so we expect a short-term mov…
⚠️ A new spike on [Global] Short Zigg has just appeared on the 1h timeframe — at the 5% depth. In previous cases, similar short-side imbalances consistently preceded declines in ETH and the broader market, which is clearly visible from the earlier examples on the chart. This doesn’t guarantee the same outcome now, but the appearance of a short-side skew after several long-biased days is an important development to …
To make the mechanics of [Global] Short Zigg clearer, here’s a brief observation. Over the past month, any short-side imbalance on this indicator consistently led to a decline in ETH and the broader market. Even during the current rally, a small short-side spike appeared on the 1h timeframe — and the market immediately produced a brief local correction. At the moment, [Global] Short Zigg shows no imbalance on any d…
🔄 Since our previous update, the market has moved higher: ETH +11%, SOL +14%, XRP +18%. The main momentum is coming from larger assets, while mid-caps and small-caps are still waiting for their turn. According to [Global] Short Zigg, there is currently no short-side imbalance on any depth. The long-side structure remains intact, and we continue to hold long positions within our system. This is not a forecast or rec…
🔄 Long Imbalance Still at Extremes Yesterday we wrote about a rare state in [Global] Long Zigg, when the 10% depth printed its maximum value — 100 — twice within a few days. Today the market has pulled back, but the picture hasn’t changed: [Global] Long Zigg at 10% is printing 100 again. Formally, we’re still in a rare long-side skew, similar to what we saw on March 7, 2025, before a strong advance. This doesn’t g…
🔍 Rare [Global] Long Zigg Signal on the Market Over the last few days, our [Global] Long Zigg indicator printed a rare extreme reading of 100 at the 10% order book depth – and this level appeared twice in just three days. Other depths are also close to their recent highs. The last time we saw similar readings was on March 7, 2025. After a short correction, the market moved into a strong growth phase: • BTC ≈ +70% …
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ziggsapp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 435,216 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ziggs” (@ziggsapp), 92 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ziggsapp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.