وفادار موندن در رابطه لطف شما به طرف مقابلتون نیست بلکه احترامیه که شما برای شخصیت خودتون قائل میشین .. 『 @zho0van 』
❤62💋3

Channel
@zho0van
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
66,595subscribers
-5,317 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001397604146 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zho0van |
| Description | قشنگترین قربون صدقه هارو یاد بگیر😍❤️ . |
| Created | Between 1 November 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zho0van |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 00:58 | 66,595 | -102 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 09:39 | 66,697 | -113 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 04:11 | 66,810 | -58 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 00:56 | 66,868 | -75 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:39 | 66,943 | -63 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:58 | 67,006 | -74 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:06 | 67,080 | -50 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:25 | 67,130 | -53 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:56 | 67,183 | -76 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:19 | 67,259 | -68 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 67,327 | -83 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:27 | 67,410 | -65 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:31 | 67,475 | -66 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:50 | 67,541 | -75 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:47 | 67,616 | -77 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:21 | 67,693 | -75 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 67,768 | -51 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:46 | 67,819 | -35 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:00 | 67,854 | -41 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:26 | 67,895 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 30 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 201 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 October 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,404 reactions across 26 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,350 | 96.2% | |
| 💋 | 54 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,404 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2025 to 10 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وفادار موندن در رابطه لطف شما به طرف مقابلتون نیست بلکه احترامیه که شما برای شخصیت خودتون قائل میشین .. 『 @zho0van 』
❤62💋3
✍️ تایپوکار جیبی اپدیت شد💥 هر جا، هر وقت، طرحت تو جیبته 🙃 فقط تایپ کن؛ طرح تایپوگرافیت آمادهست! خط کرسی، قوس، افکت و بافت، نقطهها، فونت دلخواه، وایتبرد و خروجی باکیفیت… همه امکانات روی گوشی و کامپیوتر قابل استفادست📱💻 🔗 typokar.ir امکان تهیه اشتراک یک ماهه تا یک ساله هم فعال شد با خرید اشتراک تمامی قابلیت های تایپوکار جیبی برای شما در زمان مورد نظر فعال میشود 🔥 #تایپوگرافی #خوشنویسی #تایپوکار
❤1
برایت آرزو میکنم هر جایی که هستی، اگر غمگینی یا خوشحال، اگر خستهای یا پر از زندگی، اگر منتظری یا به وصال رسیدهای، جانِ کسی باشی که جانت به جانش بند است 🤍 『 @zho0van 』
❤35
برایت آرزو میکنم هر جایی که هستی، اگر غمگینی یا خوشحال، اگر خستهای یا پر از زندگی، اگر منتظری یا به وصال رسیدهای، جانِ کسی باشی که جانت به جانش بند است... 『 @zho0van 』
❤40
صادقانهترین آرزویی که میشه برای یه آدم کرد اینه: «امیدوارم تمام حسهایی که باعث شدی دیگران تجربه کنن، یه روز به خودت برگرده.» 『 @zho0van 』
❤61
پرسيد : آدمى از كجا بداند چه كسى را نبايد از دست بدهد؟ گفت : آنكه بعد ازهر آشوبى بازهم كنارش آرام تر میشوى… 『 @zho0van 』
❤45
«برای زنده ماندن و زندگی کردن آدم باید وصل باشد؛ به آدمی، خانهای، اتاقی، پنجرهای. باید وصل باشد به ماندن، ذوق کردن، آرزو داشتن...» 『 @zho0van 』
❤35
ای که در شبهایِ دوری گریه میکردی برایم رفتی و بعد از تو دنیا غرق شد در گریههایم 『 @zho0van 』
❤22💋2
دوستت دارم بیشتر از وسعتِ دیدِ چشمانت؛ و نزدیکتر از روزنههای پوستت 🤍 『 @zho0van 』
❤36
نوشته بود که؛ عاشق شوید. نه به خاطر بوسه و.... عاشق شوید برای تمرکز روی یک نفر. وفاداری لذت دارد. 『 @zho0van 』
❤81💋1
ولی شاید دوست داشتن یعنی همین که: وقتی هست حالت بهتره وقتی هست، حتی حوصله سربرترین کارها با اون هیجان انگیزه وقتی خوشى کنارته وقتی خستهای کنارته وقتی غمگینی کنارته وقتی از عالم و آدم کلافهای کنارته... اون برای تموم لحظههات کافیه. 『 @zho0van 』
❤41
شب ها بیشتر دوستت دارم چون وقتی چشم هایم را می بندم بیشتر در خیالم راه می روی ☁️ 『 @zho0van 』
❤31
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @zho0van. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 4 posts on @zho0van as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zho0van named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“žovān | ♡ژوان” (@zho0van), 66,595 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zho0van.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.