Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for В мире животных

Channel

В мире животных

@zhivotnyimir

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

34,034subscribers

-44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001437547096
TypeChannel
Username@zhivotnyimir
Created7 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zhivotnyimir

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

34,03434,07834,0566 August 2026 — 34,078 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,078 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,076 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,075 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,074 subscribers12 August 2026 — 34,072 subscribers18 August 2026 — 34,071 subscribers19 August 2026 — 34,068 subscribers21 August 2026 — 34,067 subscribers24 August 2026 — 34,066 subscribers25 August 2026 — 34,064 subscribers26 August 2026 — 34,063 subscribers27 August 2026 — 34,061 subscribers28 August 2026 — 34,060 subscribers29 August 2026 — 34,059 subscribers30 August 2026 — 34,058 subscribers1 September 2026 — 34,057 subscribers1 September 2026 — 34,056 subscribers4 September 2026 — 34,054 subscribers6 September 2026 — 34,052 subscribers10 September 2026 — 34,046 subscribers12 September 2026 — 34,042 subscribers14 September 2026 — 34,039 subscribers15 September 2026 — 34,035 subscribers17 September 2026 — 34,034 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 42 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,027–34,085 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 15:3734,034-1
15 Sept 2026, 16:5834,035-4
14 Sept 2026, 02:4034,039-3
12 Sept 2026, 10:2134,042-4
10 Sept 2026, 05:3734,046-6
6 Sept 2026, 23:1734,052-2
4 Sept 2026, 08:4134,054-2
1 Sept 2026, 22:1834,056-1
1 Sept 2026, 00:1834,057-1
30 Aug 2026, 21:5734,058-1
29 Aug 2026, 23:0434,059-1
28 Aug 2026, 21:5434,060-1
27 Aug 2026, 19:2434,061-2
26 Aug 2026, 20:5534,063-1
25 Aug 2026, 20:4634,064-2
24 Aug 2026, 21:4534,066-1
21 Aug 2026, 18:2834,067-1
19 Aug 2026, 16:2434,068-3
18 Aug 2026, 14:4734,071-1
12 Aug 2026, 12:4434,072first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.2%
avg views ÷ 34,034 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,860
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.198%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held37 (4 June 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total58,610
Reactions total116
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 18:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
413
Videos
379
Links
338

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
14m 31s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

492 reactions across 37 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11723.8%
🤯9619.5%
😱8717.7%
🔥8617.5%
😁5110.4%
🤔5010.2%
❤20.407%
👏20.407%
💯10.203%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 492 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Sept 2026, 18:24 UTC≈6,270 views12 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

Россиянка Юлия Чумгалакова победила украинку Анну Охоту в финале чемпионата Европы по боксу в Софии. Бессильная злоба вынесла хохлушку с пьедестала.

🤯8🤔2😁2

20 Sept 2026, 08:44 UTC≈5,790 views12 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Forwarded from @yurasumyPhoto

То есть вы поняли, противник вложил в этот удар ну буквально все, что мог и на что теоретически способен. И сумели добиться только нескольких попаданий по НПЗ. А планировали явно устроить Москве настоящий АД!!! Как по мне достигнутый "результат" явно не соответствует приложенным усилиям (и тем более ожиданиям). И еще раз повторю. БРАВО НАШИМ ПВО (как большому, так и малому) и НАШИМ ВКС!!! Это реально ПОБЕДА. ВА…

🔥9👍3

18 Sept 2026, 17:00 UTC≈5,480 views10 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Forwarded from @ASGasparyanVideo

Ранее в сети появлялась информация, как «Яблоко» обучает своих наблюдателей провокациям на избирательных участках. Вот так наобучали. В сети попалось видео: мужчина что-то передаёт девушке. Наблюдатель от «Яблока» решает, что поймал подкуп избирателя, подходит разбираться и требует показать паспорта. Сенсация? Нет. Выяснилось, что это муж и жена. Никакого подкупа, естественно, не было. Видео наблюдатель отправил сво…

🤯7😱3

18 Sept 2026, 16:28 UTC≈5,240 views8 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Forwarded from @komitetnacinterPhoto

«Яблоко» учит своих адептов пакостить на выборах Партия «Яблоко», отстранённая от выборов, не унимается. Раз кандидатов в бюллетенях нет, значит, надо не дать проголосовать другим. И вот для своих адептов они проводят специальные обучающие занятия — как правильно срывать голосование. В арсенале «яблочных» наставников, оказывается, целый набор методик. Например, предлагают терять сознание прямо на участке. Или как м…

😱6👍1🤯1

18 Sept 2026, 16:27 UTC≈4,980 views15 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Forwarded from @komitetnacinterPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

👍9🔥2🤔2😁2

17 Sept 2026, 20:51 UTC≈5,890 views12 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Forwarded from @komitetnacinterPhoto

Интересно ситуация развивается. Вчера мы писали про слитый отчёт «Атласа выборов» и «Антивоенного комитета» о том, как заранее объявить выборы нелегитимными. А сегодня в тех же чатах, где сидят релоканты, всплыл ещё один документ — на этот раз инструкция для «правильного голосования» в регионах с ДЭГ. И, судя по всему, это не случайная утечка. Навальнисты, видимо, используют этот чат как канал для распространения сво…

👍9🤯3

17 Sept 2026, 20:30 UTC≈5,580 views12 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Forwarded from @komitetnacinterPhoto

Короче, ситуация. В одном чате, где сидят релоканты, всплыл конфиденциальный документ. Сливом это не назовёшь — просто кто-то из ФБК* не туда нажал и выслал отчёт в общий чат. В сообщении идёт речь о Юлии и Славе — судя по всему, о Юлии Навальной (экстремистка и террористка) и главе юротдела ФБК* Вячеславе Гимади (экстремист). Обделались, бывает. А документ-то интересный. Это совместный отчёт «Атласа выборов» и «Ант…

👍9😱2😁1

11 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC≈6,050 views13 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Forwarded from @h1ghl1ghtsVideo

Польский депутат Гжегож Браун уничтожил молотком памятник УПА*. Политик разбил высеченные на камне имена украинцев. "Этот обелиск, оскорбляющий память жертв украинского геноцида против поляков, должен быть демонтирован с помощью профессионального оборудования, которое следует немедленно доставить сюда после документирования преступления оправдания нацизма и бандеризма", — прокомментировал депутат. Монумент установи…

🔥9👍2🤔1😱1

3 Sept 2026, 15:26 UTC≈6,350 views11 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Forwarded from @h1ghl1ghtsVideo

Немецкую компанию радиоразведки, которая сотрудничает с Украиной, забросали коктейлями Молотова. Атаковали штаб-квартиру производителя Rohde & Schwarz ночью. Неизвестные подъехали к головному офису на машине и запустили несколько зажигательных устройств, пишет Bild. Полиция задержала подозреваемых на заправке. Ими оказались граждане Болгарии.

🤔9🔥1😱1

30 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC≈6,980 views11 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Video

Свидомый боксер Беринчик вышел на ринг в камуфляже. Правда, маскировка не помогла. Британский спортсмен Сэм Ноукс все таки заметил «захисника» и одержал победу единогласным решением судей.

🤔7😱2🤯1😁1

26 Aug 2026, 06:42 UTC≈5,950 views11 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Forwarded from @h1ghl1ghtsVideo

«Позор!»: в украинском Тернополе вспыхнул бунт против ТЦК. Прохожие разбили автомобиль бусификаторов и силой отбили мужчину, которого пытались задержать.

😱7👍3🤯1

25 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC≈6,600 views12 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Forwarded from @lantratovaDOBROPhoto

Киевский режим прикрывается именем Российского Красного Креста для обмана граждан Украинские спецслужбы развернули циничную информационную атаку. Главная мишень — Российский Красный Крест, который помогает семьям участников СВО. Цель провокаторов — не просто дискредитация, а откровенный обман и сбор критически важных данных через сайты-двойники. Как работает схема Злоумышленники создали фальшивый сайт-двойник, кото…

👍8🤔2😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @zhivotnyimir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“В мире животных” (@zhivotnyimir), 34,034 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhivotnyimir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.