Channel
@zhenxingcheping
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
199subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 28 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003980610929 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zhenxingcheping |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 12 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zhenxingcheping |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 01:17 | 199 | -6 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 205 | no change |
| 28 Sept 2026, 06:49 | 205 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (12 July 2026 – 12 September 2026) |
| Views total | 82 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【恋遇吧 · 恋遇记】 【恋人】： #满满 【地点】： #意中人 @yzrsheshe 【费用】： 999/2 恋遇吧半价卷 【时间】： 2026-09-09 【玩家】： #小飒 【评分规则】 颜值：8.2 限定角度非常可爱，可爱到爆炸 身材：8.5 态度：9.5 配合，投入，舒适 敏感：9 环境：9 不错 上路：9.75 非常投入，女友感好 中路：8.5 a 抽烟：无 纹身：无 钉子：无 【综合得分】：9.6 体验不错，很有女友感，投入，属于是我的偏爱 【恋遇日志】 去完kk，就打车来到意中人，一个清湖北一个清湖隔的很近。提前约好了满满，店长把满满妙妙都带给我看了下，妙妙是邻家小妹的感觉，满满进门，略昏暗的灯光下，看着非常可爱，我直接就有点基因躁动了，我心里在呐喊就这个就这个，好可爱，快快快进来上钟。 属性：满满是河南人，个子大概160左右，有个可爱兔牙，属于角度限定美…
❤1
航线： #意中人 航海员：#姜姜 船员 无痕 出海联系 @yzrsheshe 出航经费 599-1 出海日期 2026/8/10 适合人群 i人和e人都行 返航次数 第1次 海员优点：#活泼 #可爱甜妹 优点：主动，情绪价值 缺点： 无 评分颜值： 8.2 态度：10 上路：9 中路：9 综合评分：8.8 （1-5雷 6-8正常 9-10 幻神） 航海历程： 听到意中人的姜姜要跳最后一舞的消息，心里像是被什么轻轻撞了一下。不是惊涛骇浪，倒像一颗石子落进平静的湖面，涟漪一圈圈荡开，带着点说不清道不明的滋味。心底第一念头便是，无论如何，我一定要去打卡。 这一次打卡，和以往每一次都不一样。以前去，是带着些许期待，带着松弛玩乐的心态。而这次，是去赴一场告别。是和她相识相知以来的第一次，也是最后一次。这两个“最”字叠在一起，沉甸甸的，压在心口，却又奇异地不让人觉得沉重。 我没有像以前那样，以一个“送别者”的…
虽然从一开始找姜姜的时候就知道，我们相处的时间已经处于倒计时的状态，当再见的时刻真的临近，我发现我自己哭不出来，也笑不出来，第一次在mmk经历离别，我只感觉到一种非常复杂的情绪，是转了又转最后又飘走的、抓不住的微风，是在内心一直下个不停的、淅淅沥沥的点滴小雨。 原本开开心心准备周末去找姜姜，结果突然听见了最后一舞的时间要提前，紧急跑去多要了几个钟，也感谢飒总把他的时间腾给了我，一下子心情沉重了起来，哪怕早就做好了迎接道别的那天，可为什么来得这么快，来得这么猝不及防？ 再次相见，她穿的还是第一次见面穿的衣服，妆容都没有变，还是当初第一眼见到的模样，仿佛一切都很平常，我今天给她带了个小礼物，是我突发奇想买的，完全不知道为什么，我买了一根木头的发簪，我只觉得很适合她，我不会用，她也不会用，我在那看着视频教程盘了半天姜姜的头发，怎么都盘不好，我们俩在那吭哧吭哧捣鼓半天都搞不定，只能作罢，姜姜说等她学会了再发给我看盘好头发的样子，嘻嘻…
【审核评语】: 甜妹 【验证时间】: 7月21日 【妹子花名】: 满满 【验证留名】: 就是贝利亚 【人照评分】: 8.5 【颜值评分】: 9 【身材评分】: 8 【服务评分】: 9.5 【态度评分】：9.5 【环境评分】:9 【过程描述】: 起于6月13日中的第一张mmk白嫖与满满结缘意中人，历时一个月也换到了第一张兑换白嫖。还记得第一次见满满长发披肩圆脸大眼的可爱妹妹，穿着波点短裙，白色低胸小短袖胸前鼓鼓。店长领进门的时候会很热情的打招呼，贴心主动的问想喝什么出去拿，明明只是一个月却感觉过了好久，连第一次长啥样都要想好久。依旧wc依旧整理仪容仪表。今天满满穿的超短裤紧身polo小背心外加蓝色条纹衬衫👔是没见过的造型。聊天才知道原来满满发烧刚休息回来上到头课了，那状态肯定很好了。依旧三得利，调了少儿频道看动画片，先浅浅蛇一下尝尝原味嘴巴淡淡的果味，原来是喝了芭乐饮料啊，好大一瓶放在桌子上，还主动叫我尝尝，咬着满满吸过的吸管猛…
航线： #意中人 航海员：#姜姜 船员 i姜 出海联系 @yzrsheshe 出航经费 999（69折券，意中人群内中） 出海日期： 2026/07/13 适合人群：操盘手，爱嫩妹，纯爱客 返航次数： 第一次 航海员特点： #高颜值#嫩妹#女友感 优点：颜值高，气质好，女友感 缺点：无 评分 颜值：8.8 态度：9（听话，套餐内都可以捏） 上路：9（小蟒蛇，要就有） 中路：9（b左右，形状好看，有反应） 综合评分：9.9 （1-5雷 6-8正常 9-10 幻神） 航海历程： 时光悄然流转，离这篇报告的上钟时间已有些许时日。还好翻开旧日的聊天记录，那些细碎而温暖的片段，便如被风拂过的花瓣，一瓣瓣重新在心头绽开。 那天机缘巧合的相互投喂上了，我给她带了巧克力。白巧太甜腻，黑巧太苦涩，只有奶巧的口味恰到好处。不知何时起，我已然记得她的偏好和口味，把她的一切悄无声息地记在心底。像在心间辟出一方隐秘的花园，种满为她盛开的细碎花朵…
航线： #意中人 航海员：#姜姜 船员 胖虎 出海联系 @yzrsheshe 出航经费 999-200 出海日期 2026/07/19 适合人群 i人/e人 返航次数 第一次 航海员特点： #青春 #大蟒蛇 #颜值高 优点：主动，配合度高，不冷场 缺点： 评分 颜值：9 态度：10（配合度高） 上路：10（大蟒蛇） 中路：10 综合评分：10 （1-5雷 6-8正常 9-10 幻神） 航海历程 探店齁比多，性福胖虎说。 中了意中人的券，肯定要先去找意中人的最火的姜姜。初见姜姜，穿着深圳校服，但是穿什么无所谓，看女孩子是要看她的灵魂。长相不必多说，十个人看了应该有十个人喜欢。而且非常的主动，热情，配合。上路大蟒蛇，中路敏感，吃了好久😋，屁屁很翘，双手一直摸没离开过。也是一次满分体验。 店内环境 环境不错，都是床。 报告频道：https://t.me/MMKHHRZ 玩家群：https://t.me/SZMMKWDHX…
航线： #意中人 航海员：#姜姜 船员 小飒 出海联系 @yzrsheshe 出航经费 999/2 航海半价 出海日期： 2026/07/20 适合人群： 纯爱客 返航次数： 第一次 航海员特点： #颜值高 #可爱 #敏感 优点：颜值高，很可爱，课表配合，🐻敏感好看，聊天也不错有情商，屁股大，甜妹嫩妹，女大，年轻，嫩 缺点：🈚 评分 颜值：8.7 颜值高又可爱，契合我审美，甜妹，嫩妹，人照一致 态度：9.5 态度很好 上路：10 蟒蛇 中路：10 敏感嫩胸 综合评分：9.8 等个好卷还会反 （1-5雷 6-8正常 9-10 幻神) 航海历程 运气很好阿，一周4抽中1，刚好是意中人半价，找射射约了个时间我就出发了，射射最近也是很久没在航海群冒泡了。 到达意中人，姜姜进来了，今天是一身黄色连衣裙，挺少见的颜色，但姜姜穿啥都好看，依旧是非常可爱，颜值高穿啥都搭阿。 …
这篇报告发得非常快嗷！我只拖了一个星期就有灵感了！主要还是姜姜太美妙了！本拖更大王的创作欲望非常强烈，决定马上动笔！ 忘记从哪里看见姜姜的模卡了，惊为天人。在我的审美里，她就是顶美中的顶美，小蛋糕中的小蛋糕。本颜狗立刻约了冲杀过去意中人。第一眼见到姜姜，和照片长得一模一样——头发披着，眉眼弯弯，把我这条老狗直接击穿了。躺在沙发上，我把姜姜抱进怀里，闻了闻小蛋糕的味道。姜姜的味道好特别，当我把头埋进她的脖子轻嗅时，闻到的竟是在大中午太阳底下晒过的被子味道，清新又温暖，一下给我爽得瘫在沙发上了。 其实比起姜姜的顶级颜值，更吸引我的是她美妙的性格。古灵精怪，可可爱爱，那种搞怪女友的感觉非常非常强烈。当我趴在姜姜怀里时，她在那狂薅我的头发，真的很爽，快乐得不行。课本是不管的，姜姜的怀抱是快乐的，我的头发则跟鸡窝一样。姜姜真的把我哄得很好，俏皮又体贴，她能记得我们之间的小约定，把我说过的话都记在心里。总而言之，我快乐极了。 我是个本…
【审核评语】: 可御可甜 【验证时间】: 7月16日 【妹子花名】: 满满 【验证留名】: 就是贝利亚 【人照评分】: 8.5 【颜值评分】: 9 【身材评分】: 8 【服务评分】: 9.5 【态度评分】：9.5 【环境评分】:9 【过程描述】: 提起预约好了时间，和满满也是老熟人人了，一直看到的是她甜妹的一面，在我的强烈要求下这次换成了御姐风。轻车熟路上去了，依旧先去个wc依旧整理仪容仪表。刚到门口站定一秒，门后传来动静缓缓拉开，咦😾居然没看到人，转头一看，只看到一个被门帘挡住脸的紫色包臀裙🤩，手指轻轻戳一下小肚门帘开了，只看见一个脸蛋小巧带着无框眼镜眼线画的翘翘的满满，介乎于甜妹和御姐之间有点像小孩偷拿姐姐化妆品的感觉。变平时看起来更有诱惑力，只是可惜没有大波浪呜呜呜🤤🤤 简单和店长唠嗑几句拿来两瓶水就进来房间了。紫色包臀裙无框眼镜的满满魅力也是满满，看得我流口水了🤤 可惜今天投影设备有点问题，调了几分钟就叫店长来调试，后面…
姜姜 车评+1
7月12日当天更新多数车评原因为，感觉之前的有点乱，整理重新发了一下，车评具体日期请看车评内容日期
姜姜 车评+1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @zhenxingcheping. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳意中人车评反馈” (@zhenxingcheping), 199 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhenxingcheping.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.