Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

汤圆后花园

@yyt89012

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

232subscribers

+153 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004333065615
TypeChannel
Username@yyt89012
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 6 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yyt89012

Growth

79232155.56 August 2026 — 79 subscribers7 August 2026 — 123 subscribers9 August 2026 — 123 subscribers13 August 2026 — 232 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +153. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56–255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:37232+109
9 Aug 2026, 03:15123no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:34123+44
6 Aug 2026, 20:4679first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
124.9%
avg views ÷ 232 subscribers
Avg views / post
290
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (6 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total4,926
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
350.0%
👍350.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC97 viewsread 9 August 2026

上海艺术展览会报告模板: https://t.me/+nFnE0wANtSRkMjEx 【体验评分】:8.5 【人照几成】:8.5 【验证留名】:k032 【验证时间】:8月8日 【妹子艺名】:汤圆 【联系方式】:@yyt8901 【上课水费】:工兵p 【位置环境】:干净整洁,有一次性毛巾 【罩杯手感】:b+ 【身材描述】:8.5 【服务类型】:御姐 【服务态度】:还不错 【屌感紧度】:很棒 【个人总结】:匆匆忙忙、忙忙匆匆可算约上了ls,老师留了门,经典服务,早知道pp的了可惜 【温馨提醒】:报告仅供参考 请理性选择 注:提交报告 @yishuja_bot 注:提交报告时需要约课证明

8 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC121 viewsread 9 August 2026

我在上海狼友互动群工兵上榜啦! https://t.me/SHJVH099

8 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC139 viewsread 9 August 2026

【妹子艺名】:汤圆 【联系方式】:@yyt8901 【所在位置】:宝山 【上课水费】:18pp 【身材描述】:170大长腿 【凶器罩杯】:B,乳晕很大,奶头一挑逗就起立了 【服务类型】: 刚下海,专属嫩妹三件套 【服务态度】:很好 【体验细节】:压抑了两天的体内欲火早已熊熊燃烧,终于在7号夜晚再也按捺不住。老师6号首次在群里放出开课消息,当天因状态不佳且距离遥远,思虑再三选择养精蓄锐,谁知当晚就被群中兄弟抢先探路,那悔恨如潮水般涌来。痛定思痛后,7号老师在频道冒泡,我试探询问,老师称后续尚未开张,虽半信半疑,但确实寸在等待工兵券的情况。沟通完毕果断cj,老师体贴地答应等待到来。 忙完琐事,手机充满电后,直奔老师所在的公寓课室。夜色深沉,门口仅有一名男门卫维持治安,无需任何登记。老师遥控上楼,推开老师特意留下的门缝... 室内干净整洁,老师妆容精致,在迷人暧昧的灯光下散发独特魅力,优雅跷着二郎腿,JK制服紧紧包裹着娇嫩身姿

8 Aug 2026, 04:40 UTC212 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知了 🎉🎉🎉 上海市民网 宝山 汤圆 优惠福利 @yyt8901 抽奖已经结束,中奖列表如下: dinyang 琳 获得:P工兵卷 👨‍🎨 参与人数:125 人 📜 抽奖说明 1、无上课意向的兄弟,请勿抽奖。 2、中奖24小时内联系老师兑换,逾期作废。(按鸽子处理) 3、3天内需按时上课、提交作业。如有特殊情况,提前报备。 4、凡无故缺席、未提交作业,未报备、将取消后续资格。 5、优惠券禁止私下转让或买卖(工兵卷要写报告,报告不能重复发几个群) 6、中奖联系:@Zi_603 🎉『快联系负责人领取您的奖品吧~』

7 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC387 viewsread 9 August 2026

‼️‼️展览会福利群: 免费拿5折6折7折优惠 和抽奖 白嫖 现金红包 本群专属手势认证高质量老师 上海艺术展览会福利群: https://t.me/+nFnE0wANtSRkMjEx 点击进去备用群 上海艺术展览会总榜单:https://t.me/+2i_egsiBxNFlNmJh 上海艺术展览会人气推荐榜 https://t.me/+vOj1VuT48NE3MDc1 上海艺术展览会中转平台 https://t.me/+-sIwH2NalFw2MzEy 展览会老师广告群 @shanghaiyishu 个人推荐频道88🧧 📡 上榜管理:@yishuja_bot 📡 管理秘书:@Yishujia798_bot

7 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC452 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🎉 萝莉岛(@shlldq) 萝莉岛 普陀 汤圆 老师半价券抽奖 🎁 奖品清单 • 1p半价劵 × 1 🛡️ 参与条件 • 加入 上海萝莉岛 • 加入 汤圆后花园 • 加入 上海萝莉岛榜单 • 加入 上海萝莉岛报告 • 加入 上海萝莉岛甄选 • 必须设置用户名 🔮 祝福加持 • 祝福消耗:10积分 • 祝福上限:5次 • 祝福一次增加一个抽奖号,提高中奖率 • 幸运值祝福:支持 幸运值说明 ⌛ 抽选时刻 • 2026-08-11 15:07:00 📜 抽奖说明 1️⃣本次抽奖由 汤圆 老师赞助 @yyt8901 2️⃣开奖后七天有效,请再七天内使用 3️⃣遇到问题请找唯一客服 @shlldbot ✨ 愿命运之剑指引你们前行,直至胜利之光照耀每一个人。

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @yyt89012. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 400,410 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“汤圆后花园” (@yyt89012), 232 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yyt89012.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.