Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

苏州银梦|硅胶娃娃|新奇成人体验馆

@SZYM2

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

254subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003375298725
TypeChannel
Usernames@sg33551 @SZYM2
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SZYM2

Growth

254281267.56 August 2026 — 278 subscribers6 August 2026 — 278 subscribers7 August 2026 — 281 subscribers11 August 2026 — 257 subscribers11 August 2026 — 257 subscribers12 August 2026 — 254 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 6 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 250–285 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:15254-3
11 Aug 2026, 20:00257no change
11 Aug 2026, 19:47257-24
7 Aug 2026, 19:07281+3
6 Aug 2026, 23:31278no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:05278first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
121.3%
avg views ÷ 254 subscribers
Avg views / post
308
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.432%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held27 (30 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total8,316
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 06s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
571.4%
👍114.3%
💩114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC43 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

硅胶娃娃【苏州银梦】 8.11号吴中区郭巷街道 大型E奶 一比一真人 爽的很兄弟们抓紧来体验 苏州全区八折,280一小时起 加我的时候备注一下飞机 每家店都不一样,会给你发对应的店铺 飞机里也都有一镜到底的实拍,不踩坑。 #硅胶娃娃 #苏州吴中区 #成人娃娃体验

10 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC143 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

硅胶娃娃【苏州银梦】 8.10号相城区合景峰汇国际 折扣店实拍 性感尤物连体袜搭配实体娃娃 御姐的兄弟们抓紧来体验 苏州全区八折,280一小时起 加我的时候备注一下飞机 每家店都不一样,会给你发对应的店铺 飞机里也都有一镜到底的实拍,不踩坑。 #硅胶娃娃 #苏州相城区 #成人娃娃体验

10 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC135 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

硅胶娃娃【苏州银梦】 8月10号 吴中区万达广场 女仆小萝莉款式 纯欲小宝贝搭配闷骚小眼睛 你的航班正在起航 等着你来发射 全区八折,280一小时起 任何折扣店都得实拍 #硅胶娃娃 #苏州 #吴中

2

10 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC123 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

硅胶娃娃【苏州银梦】 8.10日全区八折,280一小时起 全屋智能家居 高科技体验感拉满 无套路,飞机兄弟必须打折 房间一客一消毒 各种制服都有 黑丝高跟御姐 白丝制服女仆 大奶乖巧嫩妹 不犯法,放心干 全程无接触,私密保障!!! #硅胶娃娃 #苏州 #虎丘区

10 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC128 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

硅胶娃娃【苏州银梦】 企业微信客服 #硅胶娃娃 #苏州 #成人娃娃体验

10 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC149 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

硅胶娃娃【苏州银梦】 银梦苏州首家 8月10号吴中区折扣店实拍 性感尤物连体袜搭配实体娃娃 御姐的兄弟们抓紧来体验 苏州全区八折,280一小时起 加我的时候备注一下飞机 每家店都不一样,会给你发对应的店铺 飞机里也都有一镜到底的实拍,不踩坑。 #硅胶娃娃 #苏州 #成人娃娃体验

2👍1💩1

10 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC≈1,800 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 银梦苏州站 🟡🤩😊一小时 全区八折 一比一仿真,阴道肛门双通 夹吸,震动,抖臀,口交 扭动腰部,自动摇摆。 机械口腔,自动口交。 全身关节姿势随便摆 卫生安全一流放心保障 全程无人接触放心体验 群聊 @SZYM3 频道 @SZYM2 双向客服 @SZYM0bot 专属客服 @szym4 #苏州 #成人娃娃 #硅胶体验馆 #新奇体验馆

6 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC30 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

【妹子艺名】:汤圆 【联系方式】:@yyt8901 【所在位置】:宝山 【上课水费】:800p(八折) 【身材描述】:170大长腿 【凶器罩杯】:b 【服务类型】: 嫩妹三件套 【服务态度】:很好 【体验细节】:新人老师第一天开,抱着试一试的心态约课前往。课室是公寓,门口有女门卫,但不会让你登记。遥控来到课室,环境干净。老师妆容精致,颜值不错,穿着一套白色OL职业装,小西装外套里白色抹胸把乳沟挤的很有诱惑力。简单聊了会,老师从来没有开过课,我算是她下海后的第一个客人。 各自洗澡,没有让老师做b面服务,直接三点口,老师口活没有齿感,但深喉不擅长,算中规中矩。技术和嫩妹差不多。口了五六分钟,戴套女上,女上的频率挺快,幅度不大,屌感舒适。换成cjs后,一边舌吻一边快速抽插,抚摸阴蒂的时候老师接近高潮,换成后入,站在落地镜前大力抽插了一会儿转到床上跪姿后入,做了十分钟左右再次换cjs,阴部阴毛不多,馒头逼,很饱满,水多能操出白浆,呻

6 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC12 viewsread 6 August 2026

【妹子艺名】:粥粥 【联系方式】:@zybbzan 【所在位置】:浦东 【上课水费】:1200p 【身材描述】:娇小 【凶器罩杯】:介于a-b之间 【服务类型】: 嫩妹三件套 【服务态度】:完美 【体验细节】: 结识:说起来从第一次在群内交流,到私信相互了解,已经不经意过去一个多月的时间了。在聊天的过程中,我感受到了粥粥的热情和真诚,也有少女的单纯和可爱。那种感觉仿佛回到了校园时代的初恋,甜甜的,暖暖的。 等待:粥粥一直没有找到合适的课室,所以平时只接少量的上门单,由于特殊情况,我不方便让她上门,因此我们的相见的时刻历经一个多月的等待才得以到来。 初见:和频道里的动态真的一模一样,所见即所得。身材是那么的娇小玲珑,样貌是那么的清纯可爱,见到她的那一刻,她低着头浅笑不语,我上前想要抱抱她,她娇羞的闪躲了。她夸我好帅,让她不由得心里砰砰直跳。 交流:沐浴完毕,粥粥褪去衣衫已经躺在床上,我躺在她的身旁,她扑进我的怀里,手指在

6 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC203 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

【妹子艺名】:雪茹 【联系方式】:@xueru4 【所在位置】:静安 【上课水费】:800 【身材描述】:大胸萌妹 【凶器罩杯】:d 【服务类型】: 调情, 口,爱爱 【服务态度】:态度很好 【体验细节】:时隔多日,雪茹还是在我的多翻询问下回来了,没吃到头课也算第二课吧。雪茹换了新的工作室,算是老小区里的民宿,环境好了很多,周边也没监控,不用登记,1楼直接敲门进去。室内也好很多,精致的装修的小房间,环境好了心情也好了很多。见面雪茹依然是光溜溜的😂,多日不见先聊了会,然后我就去洗洗了,洗好回来抱着雪茹在床上又聊了会天,聊着聊着小手就不安分起来了,然后开做,接着天塌了。我,我的二弟,硬不起来了😭。当时雪茹给抢救了好久,依然很冷静,没有一点起伏。我想抽支烟冷静一下,却忘了我戒烟好多年了。整个人都傻了,让雪茹抽我,骂我都试过了,依然冷静的过分,这时候我知道,我是时候结束的我的cj生涯了😭,最后聊了会天,和ly吹了会牛就灰溜溜的走了。

6 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC59 viewsread 6 August 2026

【妹子艺名】:优乐美 【联系方式】:@zhen06120 【所在位置】:宝山 【上课水费】:6p 【身材描述】:大胸翘臀 【凶器罩杯】:36D 【服务类型】: 洗吹做 【服务态度】:非常好 【体验细节】:人照一致 身材好 骚 口活很满意 服务周到 情绪价值高 【推荐程度】:9 差评:1-5分 一般:5-8 好评:8-10 魔都快乐屋入口: @SG334488 老师榜单:@xs2002109 补充:提交报告需要约课记录

6 Aug 2026, 05:36 UTC77 viewsread 6 August 2026

【妹子艺名】:兔兔 【联系方式】:@zhudi_01 【所在位置】: 【上课水费】:18pp 【身材描述】:高挑雪白胸型挺拔 【凶器罩杯】:c+ 【服务类型】: 嫩妹服务型 【服务态度】:服务嫩妹中算全面的,态度配合 【体验细节】:最近身体不适急需调节心情于是约了兔兔。这次兔兔由于去小小晗玩这本狼可是轻车熟路了。于是马上来到工作室,也是终于见到心心念念的兔兔了。今日份兔兔纯素颜,带黑框眼镜身材高挑有种青春女大感觉,虽然素颜但是是有种不一样的感觉清纯可爱。由于本狼对于这工作室过于熟悉,也是不用介绍自己洗浴兔兔想陪浴但浴室娇小(兔兔身材比较高170几)想想算了自己动手,丰衣足食,主要比较猴急。洗完之后也开始品尝一下纯情女大风,虽说素颜但也是不一样体验,高挑的身材丰满的挺拔的胸,乳晕还很粉嫩,看起来还是格外诱人,本来想着嫩妹可能会服务有点不会,没想到兔兔还是比较会的,上来就是舌吻起手,本狼也是开始默默享受,口活无齿感不喊停一直口

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @SZYM2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 40,422 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“苏州银梦|硅胶娃娃|新奇成人体验馆” (@SZYM2), 254 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SZYM2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.