可以约哦🌸 @yunxi1130

Channel
云溪小舞台
@yunxi1132
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
267subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 3 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003492151660 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yunxi1132 |
| Created | 26 November 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 3 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yunxi1132 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 267 | +28 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 16:22 | 239 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 26 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 43.8%
- avg views ÷ 267 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 117
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (26 November 2025 – 3 October 2026) |
| Views total | 351 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Oct 2026, 16:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
15 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2025 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/xclm88
https://t.me/+ZPguvYitPhAzMTM1
【时间】:2026-07-06 【老师】:云溪 【留名】:海风 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.5 【过程】:看到老师,第一眼就心动了,马上约老师。约好时间提前到达,遥控上楼,进公寓楼有密码门,教室是酒店房间,干净整洁,很安全。进门见老师性感小裙,抱了一下,聊了几句开始洗澡,全程棒洗,不用自己动手。洗好开始AB面,舔的又酥又麻,受不了,有毒龙。口了好长时间,快受不了马上叫停,开始啪啪,换了好几个姿势,老师态度很好,说话温柔,全程微笑,最后加速啪啪出货结束,休息一会,帮洗干净,很舒服的一次,还会再次出击。
❤2
【时间】:2026-07-02 【老师】:云溪 【留名】:匿名 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9.0 【颜值】:9.0 【身材】:9.0 【服务】:10.0 【态度】:9.0 【环境】:9.0 【综合】:9.17 【过程】:老师进门穿的一身黑色蕾丝内衣,老师的身材好的没得说,非常诱惑,老二立马就硬起来了 进门交了水费就去洗澡了,老师帮洗很细心,老师会主动聊天,聊天的时候听老师口语是南方口音,洗完躺下,老师开始服务,一双奶游龙了一会,又开始亲后背,可能是我后背比较敏感 一下子就硬了,然后翻身之后,可毒龙可69,我选的69,老师开始口,口活特别好,太爽了,整个过程毫无齿感。老师温柔的戴上TT后,先让老师在上,老师骑马的功夫了得 ,二弟差点交代了,赶紧换姿势,一边吃奶一边冲刺,老师发出娇声,分开老师的腿冲刺,老师交的更厉害了,最后抱着老师交代了,老师很有耐心,在老师身上歇一会才起来。整体体验感满满,老师年纪不大 属于特别耐看型的,说话…
❤1
开课了,可以约,我的报告都是真实的哦😊
郑州楼凤阁修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:云溪 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 8.0 【颜值得分】: 8.5 【身材得分】: 8.2 【服务得分】: 8.2 【态度得分】: 8.5 【环境得分】: 9.0 【综合得分】: 8.4 【验证时间】:2026-07-01 【过程描述】:看到新来的老师,很漂亮,约好时间,到了地方罚站了一会,不过地方安全。进门看到老师身穿黑色性感短裙,黑长直的头发,人照一致,很耐看。聊了一会,一起洗澡,洗了三点,老师帮忙擦干。躺在床上开始服务,胸推,慢慢往下开始口,口活不错没有齿感。69老师主动把屁股凑回来,没有异味。可惜忘了毒🐉了,下次一定补上。接着老师戴上☔直接坐了上来,一会就能听到啪啪的响声了,传教士继续进攻,抱着老师,闻着发香,疯狂撞击,最后换后入完美出货。服务型老师,身材好颜值漂亮耐看。不冷场,会聊天,主动找话题,我的理想型,值得二刷。
❤4
【时间】:2026-07-01 【老师】:云溪 【留名】:匿名 【人照】:8.5 【颜值】:9 【身材】:8.5 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.17 【过程】:✈️不能刷呀,闲来无事看到新老师来郑,正好有空和云溪老师约课,根据老师指引到很快到教室。 位置很好找,按约定时间到达,进门就是性感抹胸加短裙,还是迷人大🐻,鸡儿都有反应了,然后再看脸,御姐感觉来了,并且比较耐看主动上交学费,和老师一起褪去衣物洗澡,老师的手很软,在我身上到处游走,看着老师的大奈奈,忍不住上手揉起来,我先冲完上床,等待云溪老师,云溪老师的前戏是让我印象最深刻,A面B面服务完全不输甚至超过会所,我躺在床上感受老师的灵活的舌头触及我身体从上到下每一个敏感的部位。老师顺势就骑到我身上,一路往下,到鸡就口起来,完全无齿感,让我体会到了什么是360口,很舒服全部吃完,怕受不了直接交待了,让老师带帽,主动坐了上来,老师是个很好的骑士,…
【时间】:2026-07-01 【老师】:云溪 【留名】:匿名 【人照】:7 【颜值】:8 【身材】:8 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:8.67 【过程】:落地郑州,两天前就换了老师的券,火气大,找了个服务型老师,约好了时间,中间发生一点小误会,本来不抱希望,但是见面老师,穿着小裙子还不错,个子不算高,白白的,年纪感觉27-28?交了水费,老师陪浴,洗了三点,询问了一下课表上的毒🐲,清洗干净,在老师帮忙下擦干身体,遂趴在床上口痧,很新奇的体验,很认真,挺起屁股开始毒🐲,很牛逼!过程全程不敷衍,随后翻面开始口,小舌头在你牛牛上舔来舔去,还把🥚吸吸舔舔,带套老师主动女上,累了换咱主动出击,一场酣畅淋漓的作战。(没有蛇💋)服务型老师真不错
❤1
今天会稍微晚点开
【出击时间】:6月29号 【出击老师】:云溪 【老师花名】:@yunxi1130 【开课位置】:管城区 【人照评分】:8分 【身材评分】:8分 【服务评分】:9 分 【态度评分】:10 分 【体验细节】:下午闲着没事打开看看,发现老师离得很近,下班果断 CJ,遥控上楼,老师颜值在线,身材曼妙,服务一级棒,口活没的说👍新老师兄弟们抓紧冲
❤2
睡醒了,下午开
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @yunxi1132. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“云溪小舞台” (@yunxi1132), 267 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yunxi1132.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.