Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

郑州楼凤报告收录

@zzlfxck

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19,772subscribers

+632 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001649059042
TypeChannel
Username@zzlfxck
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zzlfxck

Growth

19,14019,77219,4566 August 2026 — 19,140 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,140 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,431 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,484 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,490 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,550 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,586 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,684 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,772 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +632. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,045–19,867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:4819,772+88
12 Aug 2026, 15:1419,684+98
11 Aug 2026, 18:3219,586+36
10 Aug 2026, 17:3119,550+60
9 Aug 2026, 19:3119,490+6
8 Aug 2026, 21:4019,484+53
8 Aug 2026, 00:5319,431+291
7 Aug 2026, 00:1419,140no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:0519,140first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.27%
avg views ÷ 19,772 subscribers
Avg views / post
844
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.069%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held40 (2 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total33,741
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,590
Links
1,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
880.0%
👎110.0%
👏110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC289 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

郑州楼凤阁修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:小猫 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 8 【颜值得分】: 8 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 8.67 【验证时间】:2026-08-14 【过程描述】:新人老师,看着照片不错,果断预约,预约过程很丝滑,老师在高档小区住,位置很好找,到小区后,遥控上楼,房间很干净。推门进去,第一眼很惊艳,老师个子很高,特别是看着你微笑,那笑容很迷人,老师身材丰满,屁股很大,瞬间让人有冲动,然后就开始冲洗,老师陪洗,老师帮忙重点洗了小弟弟和屁股,洗的时候看着你笑,很勾人。洗的很认真,奶子和屁股摸着很爽,洗完后老师给擦干。 擦干后躺床上,等老师给服务。然后A面服务,老师上去直接用口含着了小弟弟,亲了很久,口的很舒服,无齿痕。老师边口,我摸着老师的小妹妹,毛毛一般,水都流出来了,然后就是和老

1

14 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC386 viewsread 14 August 2026

郑州楼凤阁修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:满满 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:0xLige 【人照得分】: 10 【颜值得分】: 8 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 10 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 10 【综合得分】: 9.5 【验证时间】:2026-08-14 【过程描述】:很年轻,很紧,我很快,很不错,离我很近,会经常来,打个满分,看到本人小小的一只 很可爱 很会讲话 不会让人尴尬 下面粉粉的很紧服务态度很好 下次继续出击 望各位老登好好善待

13 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC538 views0 reactionsread 14 August 2026

郑州楼凤阁修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:冷雨 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9.17 【验证时间】:2026-08-13 【过程描述】:刷到了老师在线,是我喜欢的类型,雨下了两三天也停了,就约了,老师挺瘦的,九十多斤,到了之后我去洗澡,让老师换上了女仆装,太性感了,洗完出来看到女仆装得老师就一柱擎天了,口的很认真,69也做了,全程骚话,在后入中射出,特别喜欢,还会再来的。

12 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC973 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

郑州楼凤阁修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:少妇童童 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 8 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9 【验证时间】:2026-08-13 【过程描述】:居家无聊的一天,翻着tg 看看有没有比较近的ls,看到一个最近好评居多的少妇,做为一个喜欢御姐不喜欢嫩妹的老登,去看看吧,这么近。ls遥控上楼,以为是代聊居然是自聊,看来是有高人指定点,太小心了。 进门一看,160+的 身高穿着小短群,大长腿。御姐的身材,是可以采摘的。本来有点晕车,洗完澡跟童童在床上聊了几句,稍微好转之后,童童已经懂事的扎起了头发,附身口起了二弟,二弟在老师嘴和舌头的攻击下越来越硬,老师看着硬硬的二弟说前几个都软软的,你进去先慢一点。突然有点自豪感是咋回事。于是挺枪挤入老师骚穴,还挺紧,随着二弟的进进出出,终于可

1

12 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC642 viewsread 14 August 2026

郑州楼凤阁修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:晴晴 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:wang 【人照得分】: 10 【颜值得分】: 10 【身材得分】: 10 【服务得分】: 10 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 10 【综合得分】: 10 【验证时间】:2026-08-12 【过程描述】:💯 车评系统 | 默认模式 【老师信息】:晴晴 【验证留名】:wang 【上课时间】:2026-08-12 【整体评价】:👍 好评 【人照得分】:10 【颜值得分】:10 【身材得分】:10 【服务得分】:10 【态度得分】:10 【环境得分】:10 【过程描述】:看到群里面对晴晴评价很不错,今天趁着下雨天比较闲预约了晴晴,晴晴很谨慎,很安全,进屋看到第一眼就知道没有来错,很惊艳,身材很好,陪洗浴帮你洗,自己不用动。洗好后上床开始服务,服务的很仔细,声音很温柔,下面不自觉的硬起来了,开怼。下面很紧致,很舒服,尤其是后

11 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC674 viewsread 14 August 2026

郑州楼凤阁修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:晴晴 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 8 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 10 【综合得分】: 9.17 【验证时间】:2026-08-11 【过程描述】:看群里有个晴晴老师开课,感觉不错,遂联系出击。冒着瓢泼大雨,历时 50 的分钟,到达教室,遥控上楼。开门见到老师,听老师一说话就知道不是咱们这边的人,问了下才知道是个南方女子,带有南方女子特有的温婉。 老师贴心拿来拖鞋,然后一起沐浴。依旧全自动,贴心的打了两次沐浴露,给鸡鸡拨弄的梆硬。之后嫩妹三件套,亲咪咪,然后口,口的很卖力。接着女上起手,传教士,后入,各个姿势摆弄一番,在老师强烈的反馈声中,亲着老师的玉脖出水。完事老师依旧摘套,洗浴,擦拭,服务无可挑剔。临走叫车得 10 几分钟,老师说下雨你在这等吧,快到了再下去,这个态度

11 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC581 viewsread 14 August 2026

郑州楼凤阁修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:云舒 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 8 【身材得分】: 10 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 8 【综合得分】: 8.83 【验证时间】:2026-08-11 【过程描述】:二约云舒妹妹了,约的很顺利,在楼下等了几分钟上楼,进房间前出了点小意外,对面在装修,和云舒妹妹在电梯间聊了一会。一回生二回熟,都是熟人了聊的也很开心。进房间后交水费一起洗澡,身材真是看不腻,胸型和腿直戳心巴,后面床上服务也有了很大进步,干正事想忍都忍不住,直接释放。这次 cj 也是非常满意了,后面多返

11 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 14 August 2026

郑州楼凤阁修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:兮兮 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 8 【综合得分】: 8.83 【验证时间】:2026-08-10 【过程描述】:和老师约好时间,就去出击,进门看到一个jk妹妹,还带着红领巾,让我梦回学生时期啊,看到妹妹那身jk,确实很有感觉,然后洗一下,洗完之后就躺在床上,等着妹妹服务,看着妹妹穿着jk给我口,确实别有一番风味,妹妹口的很卖力,不喊停就一直口,这点确实很好,还是我主动让妹妹停下,怕被口出来,然后戴套准备战斗,妹妹各种姿势都配合,就是女上不太熟练,最后对着jk妹妹后入出货

11 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 14 August 2026

郑州楼凤阁修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:少妇童童 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 8 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 10 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 10 【综合得分】: 9.33 【验证时间】:2026-08-11 【过程描述】:颜值身材:人照8.5,胸c 服务内容:69(会所式服务) 优点缺点: 优点:态度热情,情绪价值高不冷场(各种95场的花样让你直呼受不了) 缺点:声音有点禁欲(叫床还是OK的) 推荐程度:追求服务的无脑冲 出击体验: 一、课室: ①位置好找、无门禁(但是无盘查)离地铁不算远骑个小黄车 ②课室卫生ok、隔音ok ③有一次性毛巾 二、硬件 ①身高一米65左右 ②胸D 很软 坚挺 弹性高 ③鲍鱼微微色素沉淀,汁水很多(户型很棒) ④颜值看个人喜好(频道有照片百分之九十分相似度) 三、软件 ①口技无敌了有点 ②各种花样只有你想不到

11 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 14 August 2026

郑州楼凤阁修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:晴天 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:关我什么事(嫖心要纯) 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 8 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 8 【综合得分】: 8.67 【验证时间】:2026-08-11 【过程描述】:对晴天老师早有耳闻,可惜之前没开几天便草草停课,如今重新开课必不能错过,预约好时间后遥控上楼,位置很好找,上楼后老师已经留好了门。推门而入老师穿一身旗袍装很显气质,妆容很淡,毫无风尘气息。本人和头像照片很像,肤色正常黄皮,长相虽然很御但线下小小一只,气质颜值身材俱佳是我喜欢的类型。交完水费后老师没有主动陪洗,说已经洗过我便独自简单清洗一下后擦干躺床上,床面有些乱明显有战斗过的痕迹还未及时恢复。躺床上后老师先是帮忙舔咪咪然后一路向下一口含住🐔上下吞吐起来,口活相当不错,口的时候还会时不时看向你,会有眼神间的互动,吃

10 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,490 views0 reactionsread 14 August 2026

郑州楼凤阁修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:白洁 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 10 【颜值得分】: 10 【身材得分】: 10 【服务得分】: 10 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 10 【综合得分】: 10 【验证时间】:2026-08-10 【过程描述】:闲来无事找之前的老师不巧红休,群里看见白洁老师,只是一眼便被深深吸引,果断出击,遥控上楼,见到本人更是秾纤得衷,修短合度,奈何连续夜班体力有限没有尽兴,下次必将卷土重来,绝对值得二刷,向广大狼友顶力推荐👍

10 Aug 2026, 04:10 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 14 August 2026

郑州楼凤阁修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:小瑞瑞 【老师车牌】:{1} 【验证留名】:西 西 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 8 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 8.83 【验证时间】:2026-08-09 【过程描述】:闲来无事正在看水友们聊天 看到工兵任务上了个妹子 仔细一看身材挺好 果断拍下 拍下后和老师约好第二天下午 因为老师刚开课暂时还没找好教室 出发前跟老师确定好附近酒店 到酒店后等了老师大概十几分钟就到了 一开门看到老师一头乌黑的秀发 身高160左右吧 看着很瘦 颜值和频道照片基本没两样 接着开始进来以后闲聊了一会 老师开始主动脱衣服 我看老师都这么主动了我也不甘示弱一起脱光接着老师就喊着一起洗一下吧 就开始了陪浴 过程看着老师胸大概在A+ 皮肤挺好的 白白的 下面毛量属于正常 洗好以后我就开

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @zzlfxck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 176,838 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“郑州楼凤报告收录” (@zzlfxck), 19,772 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zzlfxck.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.