Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

유안타증권 리서치센터

@yuantaresearch

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,704subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001116605335
TypeChannel
Username@yuantaresearch
Created20 February 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yuantaresearch

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@yuantaresearch/13884 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/190943 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuantaresearch/13889 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/190964 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuantaresearch/13890 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/191005 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuantaresearch/13892 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/191025 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuantaresearch/13893 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/191035 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuantaresearch/13896 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/191076 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@tRadarnewsdesk12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (120)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @yuantaresearch — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

12,70412,71112,707.57 August 2026 — 12,711 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,711 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,710 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,711 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,706 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,704 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 6 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,703–12,712 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:4312,704-2
12 Aug 2026, 00:3212,706-5
11 Aug 2026, 03:1412,711+1
10 Aug 2026, 05:1112,710-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:5212,711no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:3112,711first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.40%
avg views ÷ 12,704 subscribers
Avg views / post
432
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
36
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held36 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total15,567
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 00:04 UTC601 viewsread 12 August 2026

유안타 리서치센터 데일리 섹터 News & Comments(08/12)_5 ■ 금융 우도형(02-3770-5589) ▶글로벌 기업 주가 - 상승: JPMorgan Chase +0.6% - 하락: Berkshire Hath -2.5%, Swiss Re -1.2%, HSBC -0.5% ▶News & Data "오늘도 1000원 못 넘으면"…'동전주' 23곳 관리종목 운명 갈린다 - link: https://buly.kr/uWgp28 기업은행, 주담대 금리 0.3%P↑…집단대출 중단 후 우대금리 축소 - link: https://buly.kr/4mfMOzC 국내자산 ETF서 7000억 빠져 - link: https://buly.kr/FsL6CO2 동양생명, 우리금융 완전자회사로…8월말 상폐 후 ABL생명과 합병 - link: https

12 Aug 2026, 00:04 UTC267 viewsread 12 August 2026

유안타 리서치센터 데일리 섹터 News & Comments(08/12)_4 ■ 화장품/의료기기/유통 이승은(02-3770-5588) ▶글로벌 화장품 기업 주가 - 상승: Estee Lauder +0.7%, YSG +0.3%, Kering +0.0% - 하락: Loreal -1.2%, P&G -0.8%, LVMH -0.8% ▶글로벌 의료기기 기업 주가 - 상승: Evolus +10.2%, Fosun Pharma +0.9%, AbbVie +0.9% - 하락: Inmode -0.3%, Galderma 0.0% ▶글로벌 유통 기업 주가 - 상승: Coupang +1.9%, Walmart +0.5%, Target +0.2% - 하락: Amazon -2.1%, Shopify -1.7%, Macy's -1.5% ▶News & Data '미공개

12 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC210 viewsread 12 August 2026

유안타 리서치센터 데일리 섹터 News & Comments(08/12)_3 ■ 통신/지주 이승웅(02-3770-5597) ▶글로벌 통신 기업 주가 - 상승: AT&T +1.9%, Deutsche Telekom +1.6%, Vodafone Group +1.3% ▶News & Data SKT, 데이터센터 확장 '글로벌 1위' - link: https://tinyurl.com/3synn4ds KT, 지분 추가 확대 2대 주주 美 웰링턴, 배당 확대 압박 커지나 - link: https://tinyurl.com/mubh4v8v KT, "제미나이·클라우드 무료", 구글과 'AI 요금제' 출시 - link: https://tinyurl.com/j9udf6pe 삼성SDI, GM 美 합작공장 품는다, 지분 전량 인수 - link: https:/

12 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC188 viewsread 12 August 2026

유안타 리서치센터 데일리 섹터 News & Comments(08/12)_2 ■ 자동차/조선 김용민(02-3770-5606) ▶글로벌 자동차 기업 주가 - 상승: GM +1.6%, Tesla +0.6%, Volkswagen +0.0% - 하락: NIO -4.1%, BYD -1.1%, Mercedes-Benz -0.6% ▶글로벌 조선 기업 주가 - 상승: Yangzijiang Shipbuilding +11.0% - 하락: CSSC -2.5%, Huntington Ingalls -0.9% ▶News & Data HD현대, 숙련공 노하우까지 AI로…‘조선 마스터 에이전트’ 구상 - link: https://buly.kr/E7BWNpp "갈 길 바쁜데"…휴가 막바지 K-조선, 하투 전운에 '조업 차질' 우려 - link: https://bu

12 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC295 viewsread 12 August 2026

유안타 리서치센터 데일리 섹터 News & Comments(08/12)_1 ■ 반도체 백길현(02-3770-5635) ▶글로벌 반도체 기업 주가 - 상승: Lam Research +1.6%, AMD +1.0%, Micron +0.9% - 하락: ASE -0.2%, Western Digital -0.1%, Nvidia 0.0% ■ 전기전자 고선영(02-3770-3525) ▶글로벌 전기전자 기업 주가 - 상승: Yageo +7.7%, Whirlpool +3.4%, Nanya +1.8% - 하락: Sunny Optics -2.2%, O-Film -1.9%, WUS -1.4% ▶News & Data 야교, 왈신, AI 수요에 힘입어 7월 사상 최대 매출 기록…수동부품 업황 호조 - link: https://buly.kr/4bkbGH4

10 Aug 2026, 23:41 UTC787 viewsread 12 August 2026

유안타 리서치센터 데일리 섹터 News & Comments(08/11)_5 ■ 금융 우도형(02-3770-5589) ▶글로벌 기업 주가 - 상승: Berkshire Hath +1.5%, HSBC +0.8%, JPMorgan Chase +0.6% - 하락: MUFG -1.5%, MetLife -0.8%, Goldman Sachs -0.5% ▶News & Data 정부, ISA 혜택축소 철회 검토…'주가 누르기'는 강화 유력 - link: https://buly.kr/ChrSBLI 당국 레버리지 규제 통했나…12조원 육박하던 거래 8000억대로 - link: https://buly.kr/CsmDAAD '예금 큰손' 떠오른 외국인…은행권 '새 먹거리'로 뜬다 - link: https://buly.kr/FLaotah 뉴욕증시, 3분기부터

10 Aug 2026, 23:41 UTC350 viewsread 12 August 2026

유안타 리서치센터 데일리 섹터 News & Comments(08/11)_4 ■ 화장품/의료기기/유통 이승은(02-3770-5588) ▶글로벌 화장품 기업 주가 - 상승: Shanghai Jahwa +4.4%, Proya +2.3%, Loreal +0.7% - 하락: YSG -2.1%, Estee Lauder -1.3%, Kering -1.1% ▶글로벌 의료기기 기업 주가 - 상승: Fosun Pharma +1.6%, Sisram Medical +1.2%, AbbVie +0.8% - 하락: Galderma -3.0%, Inmode -0.8%, Evolus -0.3% ▶글로벌 유통 기업 주가 - 상승: Shopify +2.4%, Target +1.5%, Amazon +1.3% - 하락: Macy's -2.0%, Seven&i Hoding

10 Aug 2026, 23:41 UTC230 viewsread 12 August 2026

유안타 리서치센터 데일리 섹터 News & Comments(08/11)_3 ■ 통신/지주 이승웅(02-3770-5597) ▶글로벌 통신 기업 주가 - 상승: AT&T +1.1% - 하락: Deutsche Telekom -3.2%, Vodafone Group -3.1%, Verizon -0.1% ▶News & Data SKT, 대법 "가명처리, 개인정보 침해 아냐", 5년 만에 최종 승소 - link: https://tinyurl.com/34zam6jc 삼성바이오에피스, '키트루다' 바이오시밀러 허가 신청 - link: https://tinyurl.com/3cwwm54c 두산, 연내 SK실트론 합병한다, 최태원 지분도 포함 - link: https://tinyurl.com/34hf57j4 최태원 회장, 이번주 재상고 여부 정한다,

10 Aug 2026, 23:41 UTC216 viewsread 12 August 2026

유안타 리서치센터 데일리 섹터 News & Comments(08/11)_2 ■ 자동차/조선 김용민(02-3770-5606) ▶글로벌 자동차 기업 주가 - 상승: NIO +1.7%, BYD +1.2%, Tesla +0.7% - 하락: Volkswagen -1.2% ▶글로벌 조선 기업 주가 - 상승: Huntington Ingalls +2.0% - 하락: Kawasaki Haevy -3.0%, Mitsubishi Heavy -1.0%, CSSC -0.1% ▶News & Data HD현대중공업, 美데이터센터에 9560억 발전설비 공급…역대 최대 - link: https://buly.kr/C0CQFlO HD한국조선해양, 신성장 축은 '엔진'…美 공략·캐파 확대 - link: https://buly.kr/3u5Z8Cu "LNG선은 K-조선

10 Aug 2026, 23:40 UTC362 viewsread 12 August 2026

유안타 리서치센터 데일리 섹터 News & Comments(08/11)_1 ■ 반도체 백길현(02-3770-5635) ▶글로벌 반도체 기업 주가 - 상승: ASE +7.7%, TEL +4.1%, Western Digital +0.9% - 하락: Intel -4.1%, Qualcomm -3.4%, Applied Materials -3.2% ■ 전기전자 고선영(02-3770-3525) ▶글로벌 전기전자 기업 주가 - 상승: Yageo +6.1%, Nanya +4.6%, Ibiden +4.0% - 하락: O-Film -2.9%, Whirlpool -2.6%, WUS -2.5% ▶News & Data 한국 대기업들 총출동…휴머노이드 로봇 경쟁 본격 가세 - link: https://buly.kr/7mEEhWx 엔비디아, AI의 새로운

9 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC812 viewsread 12 August 2026

[유안타 클라스: Weekly Hot Stocks(08/03~08/07)] - 자료 링크: https://buly.kr/74ZCRds ▶ 삼성에스디에스 - 삼성그룹 및 금융/공공기관 AI 도입확산에 따른 클라우드 매출 고성장(2Q26 YoY+17%) - AI 데이터센터 규모 확장(110MW~800MW)에 따른 장기 성장성 증대 - 삼성 그룹 등 AX 전환에 따른 SI 실적 증가. 7.6조원의 현금 활용성 증가에 따른 벨류에이션 리레이팅 전망 ▶ LG이노텍 - 2Q26 매출 5조 5,272억원(YoY +40.5%, QoQ -0.1%), 영업이익 2,458억원(OPM 4.4%)을 기록하며 매출과 이익 기준 모두 컨센서스를 각각 약 11%, 35%가량 상회하는 호실적을 달성 - 광학솔루션의 우호적인 P, Q와 기판솔루션의 본격적인 제품

9 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC619 viewsread 12 August 2026

유안타 리서치센터 데일리 섹터 News & Comments(08/10)_05 ■ 금융 우도형(02-3770-5589) ▶글로벌 기업 주가 - 상승: Morgan Stanley +1.2%, Swiss Re +1.0%, HSBC +0.7% - 하락: MetLife -2.2%, Berkshire Hath -0.5%, MUFG -0.3% ▶News & Data 주가 급락에 마통 연체액 반년 새 33%↑…청년·고령층 연체율 최고 - link: https://buly.kr/4QppiWs 은행 정기예금 1000조원 육박…증시 혼돈에 '역머니무브' - link: https://buly.kr/FsL5TYx 밸류업 솎아내기 본격화…‘동전주·시총 미달’ 무더기 퇴출 위기 - link: https://buly.kr/7QOiOPN 1560원→1300원대

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @yuantaresearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 874,224 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“유안타증권 리서치센터” (@yuantaresearch), 12,704 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuantaresearch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.