Channel
@yuantais
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,712subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001474196305 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yuantais |
| Description | 유안타증권 투자전략 텔레그램 |
| Created | 13 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yuantais |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @yuantais/13870 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC | @tRadarnewsdesk/190954 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuantais/13871 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC | @tRadarnewsdesk/190974 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuantais/13872 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC | @tRadarnewsdesk/190985 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuantais/13873 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC | @tRadarnewsdesk/190995 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuantais/13874 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC | @tRadarnewsdesk/191056 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuantais/13875 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 23:36 UTC | @tRadarnewsdesk/191116 Aug 2026, 23:36 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @tRadarnewsdesk | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (8–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @yuantaresearch. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 6,712 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 6,702 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 6,701 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (29 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35,023 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
🧿 유안타 AI 미국 주식시장 마감시황(8/12) ［퀀트 신현용 (02-3770-3634)］ ［시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)］ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖 AI 한줄평 CPI 발표를 하루 앞두고 이란-호르무즈 협상 교착에 유가가 재차 오르며 대형 기술주가 이틀째 밀렸지만, 중소형주(러셀2000 +0.32%)와 한국(EWY +2.53%)은 홀로 버텨낸 관망세가 짙은 하루였습니다. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 [1] 오늘의 핵심 이슈 5가지 1️⃣ 대형주 이틀 연속 약세, 중소형주는 반등 • 유가 상승과 CPI 대기 속 다우 -0.34%, 나스닥 -0.60%, S&P 500 -0.32% 마감. 이틀 연속 하락 • 러셀2000은 +0.32%로 홀로 상승 마감 • 알파벳(GOOGL) -3.84%, 알파벳(GOOG…
Signed 현용 신
[국내주식 마감시황] 연속 동반 상승에 성공한 코스피와 코스닥 (8/11) 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] KOSPI 6,346pt(+0.7%), KOSDAQ 857pt (+0.4%) ① 해외 시황 : 금리 불안감에 다음주 물가지표 경계감 -간밤 미국 주식시장 하락(나스닥 -0.3%, S&P500 -0.1%, 다우 -0.1%, 필라델피아 반도체지수 -2.9%). 미국-이란 갈등 쉽게 해소되지 않으며 WTI 급등. 미국 10년물 국채금리도 4.7% 상회. 수요일 소비자물가 발표 앞둔 경계감에 지수 낙폭은 제한된 흐름. 엔비디아, MS의 자체 AI칩 확대 및 5,000억달러 규모 AI 금융 플랫폼에 대한 투자비 부담 우려에 3% 하락 ② 수급 : KOSPI 외국인 자금 유입, KOSDAQ엔 개인 자금 유입 = 양대 지…
Signed LJW
🧿 유안타 AI 미국 주식시장 마감시황(8/11) ［퀀트 신현용 (02-3770-3634)］ ［시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)］ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖 AI 한줄평 사상 최고치 이후 숨을 고른 하루였습니다. 이란의 호르무즈 해협 재개 거부로 유가가 5% 넘게 치솟자 인플레이션 우려에 국채 금리가 뛰었고, 경기민감주인 에너지는 급등했지만 성장주(나스닥)와 방어주(부동산·유틸리티)가 나란히 밀렸습니다. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 [1] 오늘의 핵심 이슈 5가지 1️⃣ 기록 경신 후 4대 지수 동반 반락 • S&P 500이 지난주 사상 최고 마감 후 이날 4대 지수 일제히 하락. 다우 -0.11%, 나스닥 -0.32%, S&P 500 -0.06%, 러셀2000 -0.56% 마감 • 에너지(+4.66%) 강세에도…
Signed LJW
🧿 [8/11, Conviction Calls] 연준 통화정책 및 시장 정상화 경로 재탐색 유안타 주식전략 김용구(02-3770-3521) 텔레그램: < https://t.me/ConvictionCall > Key Takeaways: - 고용/물가 둔화로 연준 금리동결 지속 전망 - KOSPI, 7,300Pt → 8,200Pt → 9,100Pt 계단식 정상화 - 반도체, 금리 안정 확인 후 주도력 복원 ■ 고용/물가 둔화 흐름은 연준 매파적 정점통과를 시사. 하반기 금리동결 대응 지속 전망 • 7월 비농업 신규고용 -2.3만명(컨센서스 +9.0만명 대폭 하회), 경제활동인구 급감發 착시 성격이 짙은 실업률 4.1%, 시간당 임금 상승률 +3.15%로의 추가 둔화 등 고용시장의 질적/양적 둔화 추세는 9~10월 연준 긴축(금리인상) 의…
Signed 유안타 투자전략팀 김세빈
[국내주식 마감시황] 매수 사이드카 코스닥, 8월에만 +18.8% (8/10) 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] KOSPI 6,299pt(+0.7%), KOSDAQ 855pt (+7%) ① 해외 시황 : 금리 불안감에 다음주 물가지표 경계감 -주말 미국 주식시장 상승(나스닥 +1.3%, S&P500 +0.6%, 다우 +0.3%, 필라델피아 반도체지수 +2.6%). 비농가고용 예상치 하회에 따른 금리 인상 우려 완화와 미국-이란 협상 기대감 동시에 작용. 7월 비농가 고용, 예상치(+8만) 크게 하회(-2.3만). 5~6월 수치도 하향 조정. 이번주 소비자-생산자 물가 앞둔 경계감 여전히 잔존. 시장금리 방향성은 이번주 소비자물가 따라 결정될 전망. 호르무즈 해협 정상화 과정 역시 추가적인 악재는 발발하지 않았음 ② …
Signed LJW
시황 담당하는 이재원 연구원입니다. 코스닥에 대한 과거 작성했던 리포트 공유드립니다. 이후 반등폭 키웠지만 큰 흐름에서 여전히 동일한 논리로 120일선(금일 기준 1,027pt) 을 향한 수급 정상화, 반등 여지 남아있다는 판단입니다. 코스피의 추세적 반전 및 외국인 자금 재유입을 기대하기 위해서는 시장금리(여전히 높은 수준에서 머무르고 있는 장기금리)의 안정이 필요하며 이를 위해서는 지정학적 갈등의 종식과 물가지표의 예상치 하회가 단기간 필요합니다. 또한 삼성전자와 SK하이닉스의 주주환원 정책이 예상을 넘는 수준으로 발표되어야 합니다. 시장 대응하시는데 참고하시면 좋겠습니다. 감사합니다.
Signed LJW
[시황저격] 오천피 복귀에도 코스닥을 다시 봐야할 이유 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] ■ 목차 -개인투자자 이탈과 단일종목 레버리지 ETF가 만든 수급 빈집 -이익 격차는 존재하지만 주가는 이익보다 더 많이 하락 -레버리지 규제와 정책 모멘텀, 낙폭 과대 정상화의 촉매 ■[Summary] -개인투자자 이탈과 단일종목 레버리지 ETF가 만든 수급 빈집 : KOSPI와 KOSDAQ의 연초 이후 수익률은 각각 +34.4%, -28.7%로 극단적인 격차가 발생했습니다. KOSPI는 신고가라도 경신한 후 차익실현 매물 출회가 이뤄지고 있으나 KOSDAQ은 KOSPI가 오를때도 떨어지고, 떨어질 때도 함께 떨어지고 있습니다. KOSDAQ 부진의 출발점은 핵심 순매수 주체였던 개인투자자의 이탈입니다. 연초 이후 개인은 KO…
Signed LJW
🧿 유안타 AI 미국 주식시장 주간 시황(8/10) ［퀀트 신현용 (02-3770-3634)］ ［시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)］ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ① Executive Summary 지난 주는 대형 기술주 실적 호조가 AI 지출 논란과 인플레이션 우려를 압도하며 주요 지수가 나란히 사상 최고 랠리를 이어간 한 주였습니다. 실적이 밸류에이션 부담을 눌렀고, 금리는 커브 전반에서 하락했으며, 시장의 시선은 이번 주 7월 CPI로 옮겨갔습니다. 이번 주 키워드: 실적 랠리 · AI 변동성 · CPI 시험대 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ② 지난 주 흐름과 매크로 환경 지난 주 미국 증시는 실적 시즌이 상승의 엔진 역할을 하며 강세가 확산된 한 주였습니다. 미국 최대 기업들의 실적이 AI 지출과 인플레이션 압력에 대한 우…
Signed LJW
🧿 유안타 [투자전략팀 김용구] [펀드 플로우 Weekly] - 주식형 펀드 순유입 축소, 채권형 펀드 순유입 확대 ■ 주식형 펀드 순유입 축소, 채권은 단기·위험선호 확대 • 지난주(7/30 ~ 8/5) 주식형 펀드(+$637.1억 → +$328.8억) 순유입 축소. 감소분은 사실상 미국(+0.18% → +0.06%)과 중국(+2.4% → -0.4%)에서 발생. 이외 선진국 및 GEM에서는 순유입이 확대된 점을 감안할 때, 이는 글로벌 위험선호의 훼손이라기보다는 지역 간 재분배 국면으로 판단. 한편 채권형 펀드(+$125.2억 → +$230.9억)는 4주 만에 순유입 확대. 채권형 펀드의 가장 큰 특징은 위험선호 회복과 단기채 선호. 하이일드(-0.05% → +0.50%)가 순유입으로 급반전되고 회사채(+0.03% → +0.26%)도 5…
Signed 유안타 투자전략팀 김세빈
🧿유안타 [Economist 김호정(02-3770-3630)] [8/10 FX 점검: 미·일 외환 공조와 엔 캐리 청산이 불러올 변화] ■ 핵심 요약 1. 미·일 공조 개입으로 투기적 엔화 매도는 한 주 만에 72% 소진됐지만, 환율 하락폭은 제한돼 상단 재시험 민감도는 오히려 높아짐. 2. 달러/엔은 하락폭이 4% 내외에 그치며 하방 탄력은 약화됐지만, 152엔 하향 돌파 확률은 57%로 여전히 핵심 분기점 유지. 3. 원/달러는 연내 1,400원 하향 접촉 확률 93%로 단기 강세가 우세하나, 4분기 1,450원 되돌림 가능성이 남아 있는 비대칭 구조. ■ 1) 공조 개입의 본질: 환율 방어보다 시간 매입 • 이번 미·일 공조 개입의 본질은 특정 환율 레벨 방어가 아니라, 일본은행의 금리 경로가 확인될 때까지 시간을 사는 데 있음. …
Signed Ji Yoon Lim
[국내주식 마감시황] 결국 금리와 주주환원책이 중요하다는 말의 반복 (8/7) 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] KOSPI 6,259pt(-0.6%), KOSDAQ 799pt (-0.3%) ① 해외 시황 : 금리 불안감에 다음주 물가지표 경계감 -전거래일 미국 주식시장 상승(나스닥 -0.1%, S&P500 -0.2%, 다우 -0.9%, 필라델피아 반도체지수 +0.3%). 알파벳 250억 달러 회사채 발행, 지정학적 불안 지속에 따른 유가 반등, 쿡 연준 이사의 매파적 발언 등이 겹치며 미 국채 10년물 금리 4.7% 수준까지 상승 재개. 시장금리 부담에 지수 약세 마감. 샌디스크와 WDC 실적 이후 메모리 업종의 높아진 기대치와 가격 중심 성장 우려 부각. 하지만 견조한 수요와 낙폭 과대 인식에 반등 ② 수급 : 순…
Signed LJW
[주간:知] 호실적 이후 남은 질문 (8월 2주) 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] ■Summary -주간(7/31~8/6) KOSPI, KOSDAQ은 각각 12.6%, 24.3% 상승했습니다. 7월 31일 하이퍼스케일러의 Capex 상향과 AI 수요 확인으로 KOSPI가 하루 만에 17.9% 급등한 이후, 차익실현과 샌디스크 실적 우려 등으로 변동성이 재차 확대됐습니다. 반면 KOSDAQ은 개인 수급 복귀와 대형 반도체 쏠림 완화에 힘입어 상대적으로 안정적인 반등을 이어갔습니다. -마이크로소프트, 아마존, 메타는 2026년 Capex 가이던스를 일제히 상향하거나 높은 투자 기조를 유지했습니다. Cloud·AWS·광고 등 핵심 사업의 성장과 수주잔고 확대도 확인됐습니다. AI 인프라 수요의 총량은 여전히 견조하지만, …
Signed LJW
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @yuantais. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 14,542 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“《유안타 투자전략》 김용구/고경범/이재형/민병규/이현수/김호정/신현용/이재원” (@yuantais), 6,712 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuantais.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.