Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 《유안타 투자전략》 김용구/고경범/이재형/민병규/이현수/김호정/신현용/이재원

Channel

《유안타 투자전략》 김용구/고경범/이재형/민병규/이현수/김호정/신현용/이재원

@yuantais

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,810subscribers

+109 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001474196305
TypeChannel
Username@yuantais
Description유안타증권 투자전략 텔레그램
Created13 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/yuantais

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 4 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@yuantais/13871 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/190974 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuantais/13872 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/190985 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuantais/13892 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/1914713 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuantais/13893 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/1914813 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@tRadarnewsdesk44 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (44–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 82 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 4 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @yuantais — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 4 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,7016,8106,755.57 August 2026 — 6,701 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,702 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,712 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,722 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,723 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,739 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,764 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,755 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,757 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,753 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,759 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,755 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,753 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,755 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,767 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,755 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,757 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,764 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,766 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,779 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,780 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,785 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,786 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,787 subscribers9 November 2026 — 6,810 subscribers7 August 20269 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 94 days, net +109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,685–6,826 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 11:516,810+23
5 Nov 2026, 22:186,787+1
31 Oct 2026, 15:156,786+1
28 Oct 2026, 18:086,785+5
25 Oct 2026, 14:256,780+1
22 Oct 2026, 08:396,779+13
19 Oct 2026, 00:276,766+2
16 Oct 2026, 02:286,764+7
13 Oct 2026, 00:446,757+2
6 Oct 2026, 11:166,755-12
29 Sept 2026, 01:416,767+12
18 Sept 2026, 21:176,755+2
14 Sept 2026, 06:366,753-2
10 Sept 2026, 21:586,755-4
6 Sept 2026, 02:026,759+6
2 Sept 2026, 03:556,753-4
30 Aug 2026, 07:446,757+2
27 Aug 2026, 07:336,755-9
24 Aug 2026, 15:566,764+25
20 Aug 2026, 18:526,739first reading

Engagement

84 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.9%
avg views ÷ 6,810 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
40
of 84 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held84 (29 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total52,727
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 23:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,610
Videos
≈1
Links
≈6,850

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 22:44 UTC137 viewsread 10 November 2026

🧿 유안타 AI 미국 주식시장 마감시황(11/11) [퀀트 신현용 (02-3770-3634)] [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖 AI 한줄평 예상을 웃돈 10월 물가에 10년물 금리가 5% 문턱까지 치솟으며 연준 추가 긴축 공포가 되살아난 가운데, 젠슨 황 스캔들로 AI 대장주까지 흔들리며 위험자산이 일제히 밀린 리스크오프 하루였습니다. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 [1] 오늘의 핵심 이슈 5가지 1️⃣ 인플레 쇼크에 4대 지수 동반 하락 • 뜨거운 물가 지표로 금리 급등 우려가 재점화되며 다우 -0.30%, S&P 500 -0.38%, 나스닥 -0.74%, 러셀2000 -0.68% 동반 하락 마감 • 기술(XLK) -1.15%로 섹터 중 최대 낙폭, 금융(XLF) +0.52%·에너…

Signed 유안타증권 시황 이재원

10 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC624 viewsread 10 November 2026

특히 내일 코어위브 실적은 AI 투자에 필요한 자금조달 여건이 실제로 악화되고 있는지 확인할 좋은 기회. 아직 추세적인 상승을 단정하기에는 이르지만 이익 전망이 크게 달라지지 않은 상황에서 극단적인 주가 하락을 계속 정당화하기도 어려움. 기존 반도체 대형주 Core 보유 전략을 유지하며, 신규 비중 확대는 외국인 수급과 AI 신용위험의 변화를 확인하면서 단계적으로 대응. 지금은 지나간 급락에 겁먹기보다 과도하게 할인된 기업가치를 다시 살펴볼 시점 *본 내용은 투자 판단의 참고사항이며, 투자판단의 최종책임은 본 게시물을 열람하는 이용자에게 있습니다 *자료출처: 유안타증권 홈페이지 *자료 원문: https://buly.kr/7bK0s0n

Signed 유안타증권 시황 이재원

10 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC603 viewsread 10 November 2026

[국내주식 마감시황] 11월 첫 외국인 형님들 순매수와 매수 사이드카 발동 (11/10) 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] KOSPI 5,239pt(+4.4%), KOSDAQ 668pt(+4.5%) ① 해외 시황 : 미국 반도체 급등, AI 투자와 유가 부담 완화 -간밤 미국 주식시장은 다우 +2.2%, S&P500 +2.4%, 나스닥 +2.7%로 일제히 급등(필라델피아 반도체지수 +6.9%, AMD +13.3%, 브로드컴 +8.8%, 마이크론 +6.3%). 지난주 과도했던 낙폭에 저가 매수세가 유입된 가운데 AI 투자와 지정학적 위험을 둘러싼 우려가 일부 완화된 영향. 특히 골드만삭스 데이비드 솔로몬 CEO는 최근에도 AI 인프라 관련 자본시장 거래가 활발하며 투자 수요가 여전히 강하다고 언급. 코어위브 등 일부 기…

Signed 유안타증권 시황 이재원

9 Nov 2026, 22:51 UTC551 viewsread 10 November 2026

🧿 유안타 AI 미국 주식시장 마감시황(11/10) [퀀트 신현용 (02-3770-3634)] [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖 AI 한줄평 엔비디아(NVDA) CEO 스캔들과 이사회 조사로 AI 대장주가 홀로 밀렸지만, AMD·브로드컴과 반도체 장비주로 매수세가 번지며 4대 지수가 일제히 2% 넘게 반등했습니다. 중소형주(러셀2000 +3.15%)까지 가세하며 랠리의 저변이 넓어진 하루였습니다. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 [1] 오늘의 핵심 이슈 5가지 1️⃣ 4대 지수 일제히 2%대 반등 • 지난주 AI 급락 이후 투자 심리 회복되며 다우 +2.15%, 나스닥 +2.74%, S&P500 +2.35%, 러셀2000 +3.15% 동반 상승. 다우는 1,000pt 넘게 급등. • …

Signed 유안타증권 시황 이재원

9 Nov 2026, 08:26 UTC801 viewsread 10 November 2026

[국내주식 마감시황] 이제 하다하다 CEO 사생활까지... (11/9) KOSPI 5,019pt(-0.8%), KOSDAQ 639pt(-0.8%) ① 해외 시황 : 미국 반도체 반등에도 젠슨 황 악재 부각 -지난 금요일 미국 주식시장은 다우 -0.5%, S&P500 +0.3%, 나스닥 +1.1%로 기술주 중심 반등(필라델피아 반도체지수 +4.2%, 엔비디아 +2.8%, AMD +11.0%, 마이크론 +5.1%). 전 거래일 급락에 따른 저가 매수세 유입. 다만 주말 사이 엔비디아 젠슨 황 CEO가 중국 정보기관의 접근 대상이었다는 의혹이 제기되면서 새로운 불확실성 부각. 젠슨 황 CEO는 사실을 인정하고 조사에 협력하겠다고 한 상황. 엔비디아 이사회가 독립조사에 착수한 가운데 회사 측은 기술 유출이나 국가안보 침해를 의심할 근거가 없다고…

Signed 유안타증권 시황 이재원

8 Nov 2026, 23:44 UTC628 viewsread 10 November 2026

🧿 유안타 AI 미국 주식시장 주간 시황(11/9) [퀀트 신현용 (02-3770-3634)] [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ① Executive Summary 지난주는 AI·반도체 밸류에이션이 일제히 되돌려진 리셋 주간이었습니다. 목요일 AI 집중 매도를 기점으로 기술섹터가 무너졌고, 엔비디아 CEO를 둘러싼 개별 리스크와 에너지 급락이 겹치면서 방어 자산으로의 자금 이동이 뚜렷하게 나타났습니다. 이번 주 키워드: AI 밸류에이션 리셋 · 에너지 급락 · 방어 자금 이동 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ② 지난 주 흐름과 매크로 환경 지난주 시장의 서사는 기술주 중심의 차익 실현으로 요약됩니다. 주 초반 AMD는 3분기 데이터센터 매출이 전년 대비 거의 두 배로 늘었고 리사 수 CEO가 성장 …

Signed 유안타증권 시황 이재원

8 Nov 2026, 23:44 UTCviews —

《유안타 투자전략》 김용구/고경범/이재형/민병규/이현수/김호정/신현용/이재원 pinned «🧿 [11/9, House View] 긴급 대응전략: 투매보단 보유, 관망보단 매수 유안타 주식전략 김용구(02-3770-3521) 유안타 시황 이재원(02-3770-5719) 유안타 퀀트 신현용(02-3770-3634) 텔레그램: < https://t.me/ConvictionCall > ■ Survival 전략: KOSPI 5천P에선 현 주가/밸류를 담보로 시간 싸움에 매진 [Strategist 김용구] • KOSPI 5천Pt선 전후 구간에선…»

8 Nov 2026, 22:48 UTC445 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @ConvictionCall

🧿 [11/9, House View] 긴급 대응전략: 투매보단 보유, 관망보단 매수 유안타 주식전략 김용구(02-3770-3521) 유안타 시황 이재원(02-3770-5719) 유안타 퀀트 신현용(02-3770-3634) 텔레그램: < https://t.me/ConvictionCall > ■ Survival 전략: KOSPI 5천P에선 현 주가/밸류를 담보로 시간 싸움에 매진 [Strategist 김용구] • KOSPI 5천Pt선 전후 구간에선 부화뇌동격 투매보단 차라리 보유가, 속수무책의 관망보단 전향적 매수 대응이 절대적으로 유리. 1) KOSPI 최근 2년 고점 대비 MDD는 -44.5%로 글로벌 추세적 위기 현실화 당시의 -40%선을 넘어 '97년 동아시아 외환위기, '00년 닷컴버블 붕괴, '08년 미국 금융위기 등 시스템 …

Signed 유안타 투자전략팀 김세빈

8 Nov 2026, 22:43 UTC436 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @ConvictionCall

🧿 유안타 [투자전략팀 김용구] [펀드 플로우 Weekly] - 중국 부양책 및 미 중간선거 불확실성 해소, 주식형 펀드 20주 내 최대 순유입 ■ 신흥국 주식 52주 최대 순유입, 신흥국 채권 52주 최대 순유출 • 지난주(10/29 ~ 11/4) 주식형 펀드(+$562.3억 → +$892.2억)는 20주 만의 최대 순유입을 기록. 4주 누적 기준으로는 $2,655억으로 52주 내 최대. 신흥국(+$305.6억 → +$451.3억)이 2주 만에 52주 최대를 갱신했고, 선진국(+$440.9억)도 미국(+$317.2억)의 역내 순유입 확대로 견조한 순유입 발생. 단, 선진국 액티브(-$84.4억)는 32주 만의 최대 순유출로 선별 자금의 이탈은 오히려 심화. 채권형 펀드(+$153.9억 → +$115.7억)는 순유입이 둔화됐으며 이는 신흥…

Signed 유안타 투자전략팀 김세빈

6 Nov 2026, 07:57 UTC≈1,820 viewsread 10 November 2026

[국내주식 마감시황] AI 우려에 아시아 주식시장 동반 급락 (11/6) KOSPI 5,060pt(-6.0%), KOSDAQ 644pt(-5.0%) 시황 : 외국인 투매와 강제매도 우려가 확대시킨 하락, 아직 확인되지 않은 이익 훼손 -금일 KOSPI와 KOSDAQ은 각각 6%, 5% 급락했습니다. 간밤 미국 나스닥(-5.5%)과 필라델피아 반도체지수(-12.3%) 급락의 영향으로 장 초반부터 매도세가 집중됐습니다. KOSPI는 개장 3분 만에 8.8% 급락하며 5,000pt를 하회했고, 1단계 서킷브레이커가 발동돼 20분간 거래가 중단됐습니다. 이후 양 시장에서 매도 사이드카까지 발동됐습니다. 장중 낙폭을 일부 회복했지만 반도체 대형주와 AI 인프라 전반의 약세가 지속되며 이틀 연속 대규모 투매가 나타났습니다. -가장 큰 부담은 외국…

Signed 유안타증권 시황 이재원

6 Nov 2026, 00:30 UTC≈2,730 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed 유안타증권 시황 이재원

Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @yuantais. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“《유안타 투자전략》 김용구/고경범/이재형/민병규/이현수/김호정/신현용/이재원” (@yuantais), 6,810 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuantais.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.