Channel
@cctimes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
362subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001972844360 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cctimes |
| Created | 2 June 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cctimes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 362 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 356 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 356 | first reading |
2 posts held, back to 2 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
27 reactions across 1 post, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 55.6% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 37.0% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 7.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2023 to 19 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
阳光集团：2年累计投入百万美元打造新闻媒体行业巨头 😀😃😃😃😃😃 大咖 @daka ✅ 🔥TG无处不在|无孔不入的【爆料联盟】 🔥持续打造1千个全局搜索【引流频道】 1️⃣阳光新闻 @yangguang 全面型新闻曝光频道，全网最新最快最全行业资讯，寻人|互助|曝光|悬赏|反诈|揭秘|一条龙服务 2️⃣柬中时报 @cctimes 柬埔寨最具影响力和公信力的华人新闻媒体。 3️⃣华人大事件 @dashijian 巨资打造 正版大事件品牌，其他大事件均为假冒！ 服务于行业高端人群，专注于重大新闻和突发事件发布，揭秘各大园区黑暗内幕，扶手与盘总聚集地。 4️⃣人民日报 @renmin 东南亚实时新闻无广告版，干净的浏览体验。 5️⃣优质新闻频道可加入联盟在此处展示，价格8888U/月 ▪️流量来源介绍 😊表情包&emoji 😄电报百科导航 🎁中文包大全 《柬中时报》柬埔寨最具公信力和影响力的中文新闻媒体。The …
👍15❤10🥰2
Channel created
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @cctimes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 227,322 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“柬中时报官方导航 @cctimes” (@cctimes), 362 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cctimes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.