Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ёж – журнал

@yozh_main

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

117subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004353901622
TypeChannel
Username@yozh_main
DescriptionЛонгриды и заметки по текущим событиям, истории, политической теории и экономике редакции канала «Ёж-медиа»
Created17 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/yozh_main

Growth

1176 August 2026 — 117 subscribers9 August 2026 — 117 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116–118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 05:00117no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:00117first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
714.2%
avg views ÷ 117 subscribers
Avg views / post
836
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held10 (17 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total6,685
Reactions total65
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2640.0%
2233.8%
🔥1523.1%
👎23.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC897 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Смысл государственных социальных благ не в том, чтобы вы пользовались. Напротив, этого как раз и не нужно государству, чтобы использовали услуги или, тем более, получали их в наивысшем качестве, потому что это к тому же еще и дорого. В чем же тогда смысл тех социальных обязанностей, которые исполняет государство? Их смысл в облегчении извлечения ренты, то есть всяких благ, полезных вещей, которые производят люди, п

👍32

30 Jul 2026, 07:31 UTC776 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Реальный путь Можно встретить мнение, что в России необходимо социальное государство, такое государство, которое в действительности бы заботилось о своих гражданах за их налоги, предоставляя им все те блага, которые, по мнению некоторых, являются базовым правом всех людей. Это такие блага, как медицина, образование, понятное дело, дороги и некоторые другие. Проблемы подобного подхода, подобных беспочвенных мечтаний

👍5🔥42

29 Jul 2026, 06:16 UTC800 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Чем государство отличается от мафии и при чём тут социальные функции? Главное отличие государства от мафии — это его монополия на насилие на конкретной территории. Особенность этой монополии в том, что она легитимна, то есть воспринимается как норма не только тем, кто её осуществляет, но и теми, над кем она осуществляется, а также окружающими. В отличие от просто организованных банд, которые тоже могут иметь свою т

3👍2

25 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTC≈1,000 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Свобода и воля Полагаю, что мы совершенно напрасно позаимствовали у западных коллег идею о свободе. Я уже говорил, что существуют три свободы. Две из них вывел Исайя Берлин — негативная и позитивная. Первая — против всего, вторая — ради чего-то. Я же добавил третью: человеку нужна свобода от всего, чтобы выбрать то, ради чего он действительно готов потратить своё ограниченное время и силы. В чём же проблема концеп

9👍4🔥4

25 Jul 2026, 06:30 UTC929 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Когда Зеленский объявил о 40-дневной операции по принуждению к миру, он, скорее всего, подразумевал те удары по «Мираторгу», WB и складам «Магнит», которые происходят, потому что это огромные налогоплательщики, работодатели, и на них в целом завязана огромная часть логистики. Возьмём для примера WB. Есть селлеры, которые через него торгуют. Многие торгуют в том числе и на кредитные средства. По складам бьют, товар г

👍6🔥4

21 Jul 2026, 05:23 UTC≈1,090 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Цифровая конфедерация Из того, что мы сказали тут, что могло бы быть воплощением либертарианства в новой эпохе? Насколько это в целом реально? Возьмем Россию с ее вечной проблемой контроля за малонаселенными территориями и разноразвитости регионов из-за чего одни институционально перевешивают другие, укрепляя авторитарные тенденции и традиции. Как не странно, но поддержание контроля за разными территориями дронами,

👍5🔥3👎21

20 Jul 2026, 07:18 UTC250 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Публикуем нашу папку, где собрались одни из самых крутых каналов, продвигающих идеи права и свободы! Еж-медиа — вестник российского либертарианства и правоцентризма. Новости России, мира, а также авторские эссе и аналитика. О наболевшем — ежиный щитпост, мемы и всякие отвлеченные размышления. Мировые События Сейчас (МСС) — новости со всего мира. Классический Либерал — цитаты, статьи и статистика по теме правого л

20 Jul 2026, 06:47 UTC943 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Актуальность либертарианства Ранее мы с вами касались вопроса о том, что несёт нам новая эпоха с её централизованными цифровыми валютами, которые можно программировать, и использованием дронов для контроля за малонаселёнными территориями. Мы пришли к выводу, что это явно наступление на свободу и в известной степени конец привычного нам капитализма, но не конец рынка как идеи о добровольном обмене между людьми. Это н

5👍1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @yozh_main. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 131,000 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ёж – журнал” (@yozh_main), 117 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yozh_main.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.