7 measurements spanning 7 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,152–14,158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 14:58
14,156
-1
11 Aug 2026, 13:33
14,157
+1
10 Aug 2026, 16:34
14,156
+2
9 Aug 2026, 15:13
14,154
-1
8 Aug 2026, 16:31
14,155
+1
7 Aug 2026, 14:04
14,154
+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:32
14,153
first reading
Engagement
81 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.0%
avg views ÷ 14,156 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,550
81 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
81
of 81 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
81 (3 August 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
206,447
Reactions total
2,359
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 22:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,750
Videos
≈352
Links
≈1,540
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
57s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,359 reactions across 81 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
606
25.7%
💔
521
22.1%
👍
336
14.2%
🤣
221
9.37%
👎
133
5.64%
💘
104
4.41%
🎉
67
2.84%
❤🔥
57
2.42%
🤩
57
2.42%
😭
50
2.12%
🔥
41
1.74%
😈
25
1.06%
😍
19
0.805%
🤯
17
0.721%
🤝
15
0.636%
🍓
13
0.551%
😁
12
0.509%
🐳
10
0.424%
🦄
9
0.382%
😢
7
0.297%
20 further kinds
39
1.65%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,359reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
۷ دوره ضروری + ۸ گواهی پایان دوره، فقط با هزینه یک دوره!
پکیج جامع مهارتهای هفتگانه کامپیوتر (ICDL)!
آموزش کامل:
🔹مبانی کامپیوتر و ویندوز
🔸مفاهیم پایه IT و امنیت
🔹اینترنت و ایمیل
🔸کار با Word
🔹کار با PowerPoint
🔸کار با Excel
🔹کار با Access
هزینه ثبتنام عادی:
4/015/000 تومان
با کدتخفیف ic55 امروز فقط با پرداخت 699 تومان ثبتنام کنید!
🔺مشاهده دقیق سرفصلها و ثبتنام در لینک زیر:
https://zhivaramoozan.com/?p=15…
🌀 دو ساعت آموزش رایگان و آنلاین 🌀
🖌 فن ISI نویسی🖌
👨🏫مدرس: دکتر رامین رحمانی
استاد دانشگاه
🗓 شنبه ۲۴ مرداد 🗓
⏰ ساعت ۱۸ تا ۲۰ ⏰
🔴 ورود برای عموم آزاد است 🔴
برای آگاهی از سایر وبینارهای رایگان به کانال زیر مراجعه کنید
👇👇
@RahmaniRamin
جهت شرکت در وبینار، نام ونامخانوادگی، ایمیل و شماره همراه خود را به آیدی زیر ارسال نمایید
👇👇
@Tatacademy
@Tatacademy
➖➖➖➖➖…
🔺دانشجویان گرامی، ضمن تشکر از همکاری شما عزیزان
لازم به ذکر است ظرفیت همکاری به عنوان مراقب و رابط تکمیل شده است.
لذا از این جهت پیام ندهید، باتشکر.
🪩 یـوباسـو - دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان🎓
💠 @you_basu
#یادآوری…
🔺 دانشجویان گرامی مشمول به تمدید سنوات، در صورت نیاز به تمدید سنوات اقدام کنید که روز انتخاب واحد به مشکل نخورید.
🪩 یـوباسـو - دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان🎓
💠 @you_basu
#گرین_برد
۱- سلام وقتتون بخیر
ما پنج نفریم و به یه گل دختر نیاز داریم برای خوابگاه دباغ.گرمایی سرمایی بودنش مهم نیست.فقط مهربون و پایه و مرتب،خون گرم و اهل دل باشه
یه مورد دیگه اینکه با تخت بالا مشکلی نداشته باشه👼🏻
ما ترم سه هستیم و ترجیحا ترم سه ای باشن
امیدوارم هم اتاقیای خوبی برای هم باشیم🫠🩵
۲- سلام وقت بخیر
ما پنج نفریم و ی نفر میخوایم تا خوابگاه دباغ اتاق بگیریم شرایط خاصی نداریم بیرون زیاد میریم زیاد تو خواب…
#گرین_برد
۱- سلام دوستان ما پنج نفریم یک نفر دیگه لازم داریم برا خوابگاه کوثر ترم سه هستیم خودمون شرایطمونم اینه نظافت رو رعایت کنه و کارهای اتاق رو همگی باهم انجام میدیم اروم باشه و با ملاحظه باشه مثلا موقعی که بقیه خوابن رعایت کنن
۲- سلام بچهها، ما چهار نفریم و دنبال دونفر دیگهایم
خیلی شرایط سختی نداریم و کلاً آدمهای آروم و بیحاشیهای هستیم؛ سرمون به کار خودمونه و اهل دعوا، شلوغی و حاشیه نیستیم و دوست داریم …
🦋عکس های بالا رو باز کن! 🧚🏻♂️
اینجا چنلی پر از لباسایی که هیچ جای دنیا نمیتونی پیدا کنی💆🏻♀️📻🌱
کلی هم تنوع داره میتونی با قیمت مناسب تهیه کنی!🤍👾
🎀 https://t.me/+KAmI7z5GbuI4YTBk
وقتی وارد چنلش شدی مواظب موجودی حسابت باش👩🏻🦯💸 ࣪𓂃 ִֶָ
از من گفتن بود عضو چنلش نشی از دستش دادی⭐🐹
ادمین:
🎀 @hny_admin
چنل کد مرسوله و رضایت:
🎀@hnycollectioncod
Girl to Girl:👭🏻
زیبایی از ظرافت شروع میشه✨🎀
انجام خدمات ناخن با بروزترین تکنیک ها و بهترین مواد🙂↔️
به دلیل افتتاح سالن پنجاه درصد تخفیف گذاشتیم روی همه خدمات😍
🔺کاشت دست:۸۰۰❌۴۰۰✅
🔺کاشت پا:۵۰۰❌۲۵۰✅
🔺ژلیش دست:۴۰۰❌۲۰۰✅
🔺ترمیم:۷۰۰❌۳۵۰✅
طراحی ها:
کروم/فرنچ/آمبره
طراحی:به مناسبت افتتاحیه رایگان😍
📍هنرستان
جهت مشاوره و نوبت دهی به آیدی زیر پیام بدید:⭐️
@MeloO_20
❤9🤣8
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @you_basu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به نظر شما قیمت مناسب برای سیمی کردن هر جلد کتاب مدرسه چقدر باشد؟
💯 ۱۰۰ هزار تومان (طبق نرخ اتحادیه)15%
✅ ۹۰ هزار تومان9%
👍 ۸۰ هزار تومان15%
❤️ ۷۰ هزار تومان70%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 491,458 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@you_basu named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@frs2984 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ubasu 𒊹 دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان” (@you_basu), 14,156 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/you_basu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.