Channel
@yichuanfh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
132subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003983635162 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yichuanfh |
| Description | 公益频道 主玩fh 频道主 @yichuanfh666 本人新秀 您好，Telegram，本频道不违反服务条款，并承诺不违反您的服务条款。请保护本频道免受破坏 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yichuanfh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 132 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 132 | +11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 121 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 242 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 00:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟 小昼互推 接纳各种小频道 请不要删除此信息否则取消互推资格 1. 熬夜 2. 和平78\REX直装官方频道 3. 王者荣耀小土豆直装 4. 七夜改文件官方频道🇨🇳 5. AS cheat MOD 🇨🇳 4\.5 6. RKR直装官方频道 7. 厚焰授权号\(不定期送号\) 8. 陈少改文件主频道 9. ［防丢失］小昼的导航频道 10. 小宇皮肤号🇨🇳 11. 寒冰数据号 12. 李宁公益官方🇨🇳 13. 无缘公益项目频道 14. 秋雨账号 和平账号 其他账号 15. 川少\(免费数据号\) 📌 共 90 个频道加入互推 📄 第 1/6 页
Signed 小昼互推_Bot
✈️TELEGRAM官方通知 我们为你整理了挂圈最顶尖的频道 点击下方按钮或蓝色文字即可加入 👤上善若水破解簧片/外挂 👤灯枣_MOD官方主频道 👤残念改文件主频道 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 一键加入挂圈全部顶尖频道 一键加入挂圈全部顶尖频道
Signed 频道主
https://t.me/qqqtfh8
Signed 千权
频道满990人免费发码反教程 https://t.me/GGBB9911
Signed 与秋
频道满990人免费发码反教程 https://t.me/GGBB9911
Signed 与秋
https://t.me/qqqtfh8
Signed 千权
频道满990人免费发码反教程 https://t.me/GGBB9911
Signed 与秋
📱你还在担心你的频道没时间管理吗 只需要一个管理位我就可以帮你管理频道 想找公益封号思路的频道？想找可以开户查档的频道？想找优质号商的频道？想找经常送福利可以白嫖各种账号 靓号 nft 红包的频道？ ✅脸红集团专业互推/团队运营 🔼高效上人速度/免费引流 各平台账号源头卡网😃 https://new.cayfpay.cn/shop/UZXDL3NC 点击下方链接一键加入高质量频道合集 互推交流群 @douqie 😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃
Signed 脸红(回收nft礼物/用户名)
频道满990人免费发码反教程 https://t.me/GGBB9911
Signed 与秋
赶紧宣传起来，兄弟们，要求不高，频道破1.5k 下个版本更新后持续公益，宣传力度越大公益时间越久！ 让我们战战战杀杀杀。 https://t.me/GGBB9911
👍1
Signed 与秋
📱你还在担心你的频道没时间管理吗 只需要一个管理位我就可以帮你管理频道 想找公益封号思路的频道？想找可以开户查档的频道？想找优质号商的频道？想找经常送福利可以白嫖各种账号 靓号 nft 红包的频道？ ✅脸红集团专业互推/团队运营 🔼高效上人速度/免费引流 各平台账号源头卡网😃 https://new.cayfpay.cn/shop/UZXDL3NC 点击下方链接一键加入高质量频道合集 互推交流群 @douqie 😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃
Signed 脸红(回收nft礼物/用户名)
https://t.me/qqqtfh8
👍1
Signed 千权
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yichuanfh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
好久没有公益文本了 你们说要不要公益文本？
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,086,273 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@yichuanfh named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“遗传主频道” (@yichuanfh), 132 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yichuanfh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.