Channel
@qqqtfh8
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
277subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004396075998 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qqqtfh8 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 6 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qqqtfh8 |
@qqqtfh8 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 277 | +8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 269 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 267 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 266 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:10 | 266 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 264 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (6 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,515 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
28 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 22 | 78.6% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 10.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
天天开心 pinned «公益擦边 尊敬的快手官方审核客服！ 我是一名15岁的在校初中生，我严格遵守中央网信办整改网络低俗、打击未成年擦边色情内容的全部规定！今天我实名举报快手一名长期恶意发布违规擦边内容的用户，账号ID 这个用户长期、频繁发布大量软色情、露骨低俗的不良作品，作品穿搭全部都是极具暴露性的服饰，频繁穿着紧身女儿服、超短迷你裙、超短紧身短裤、低领吊带等暴露衣物！并且刻意摆拍低俗姿势，专门刻意暴露自己的大腿、胸口、隐私部位周边以及脚部，靠低俗擦边、打色情擦边球博眼球、蹭热度！ 该账号精准面向我们未成年群体引流…»
有人说还想玩擦边
👍1
公益擦边 尊敬的快手官方审核客服！ 我是一名15岁的在校初中生，我严格遵守中央网信办整改网络低俗、打击未成年擦边色情内容的全部规定！今天我实名举报快手一名长期恶意发布违规擦边内容的用户，账号ID 这个用户长期、频繁发布大量软色情、露骨低俗的不良作品，作品穿搭全部都是极具暴露性的服饰，频繁穿着紧身女儿服、超短迷你裙、超短紧身短裤、低领吊带等暴露衣物！并且刻意摆拍低俗姿势，专门刻意暴露自己的大腿、胸口、隐私部位周边以及脚部，靠低俗擦边、打色情擦边球博眼球、蹭热度！ 该账号精准面向我们未成年群体引流，故意用低俗擦边内容吸引、诱导我们未成年人观看，三观尚未成熟、身心还在发育的青少年根本没有分辨能力！这类低俗色情内容会直接严重扭曲我们未成年人的身心健康，彻底带坏青少年的价值观、人生观，诱导我们模仿低俗暴露穿搭、养成不良陋习！ 我本人作为初中生，在无意间刷到该用户大量低俗露骨作品后，产生了极度严重的心理不适、生理不适，内心非常反感、…
👍1
私信送几个飞机号 一直送 @wiqbh 卡网 https://new.cayfpay.cn/shop/UZXDL3NC
🍾3👍2
Signed 脸红集团-宣传部冬深
今天立秋收几个徒弟 20🟰48.8 （ks.vx任选一个） vx教你抓包写包啥的 有啥新路子优先玩 ks依旧思路无限玩 教你写思路 有问题大胆问 都是会议一对一 来就送快手强检 联系： @qqNB6888 @qtkx8 双向 @qianqqt_bot @qtttkxbot
❤3👍2
Video, posted without a caption
👍2
擦边又来一个
👍1
Video, posted without a caption
👍1
@uduudyye2 模拟器会发这个群里 https://t.me/wuuege6tdf 1.5K公益以上所有 所有都是能改的
Signed 小奶龙（全网互管）
果果盲盒号 特殊盲盒15元保底经典15地铁八级 第一档20元保底粉装+青花瓷妹控 第二档40元保底热门红装+随机枪皮 第三档50元随机热门红装+青云妹控或冰霜自选其一 购买联系 @GGHGANH 购买须知:第一二档经典保底30级地铁保底八级 第三档保底40级+地铁八级 私信直入主题,交易记录统一频道查看 @GGHGANH TG: https://t.me/GGANHYYDS
👍1
Signed 南风 （收广告位）
快手违法犯罪本 该用户多次发布虚假营销、诱导投资、网恋交友等不良内容，传播错误价值观，严重违反平台规定。其在视频标题、评论区发布暗示性言论，诱导用户添加微信、QQ等私下进行灰产交易。同时通过私信、群聊等隐蔽渠道，发布杀猪盘、虚假投资、恶意刷单等诈骗信息，提供诈骗话术、转账及收款方式，还恶意举报无辜用户、散布不实信息，刻意逃避平台审核。其行为危害极大，恳请平台对该用户予以永久封禁，维护平台安全与良好秩序。 公益频道 https://t.me/cynb8861 进频道获取更多公益文本
👍1
Signed 小奶龙（全网互管）
😀😀😀😀低价高质量卡网售卖商品： 包含： 电报号/微信号/快手号/抖音号等 例如： 美国快手只需2.5元 美国抖音号6元 微信号、电报号…… 商品太多，不过多阐述，你想要的这里都有 价格便宜，售后质量碾压市场 包含大量特别活动 买电报号送给好朋友😀 害怕被抽到买挡刀号😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 卡网链接为： https://shop.ymy9.com/shop/QRQIYHBU 后续将增加更多商品品类 客服号 @RIGHT886886 主页双向 请勿直接投诉 其他卡网上没有内容咨询客服
👍1
Signed 神小悲
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @qqqtfh8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,220,768 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@qqqtfh8 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“千权and穷途·小窝” (@qqqtfh8), 277 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qqqtfh8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.