Channel
@CSWJNB666
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
62subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003260515548 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CSWJNB666 |
| Description | 专业和平文件 ▃ ▆ █ 𝙄𝙈𝙋𝙊𝙎𝙎𝙄𝘽𝙇𝙀 𝙄𝙎 𝙉𝙊𝙏𝙃𝙄𝙉𝙂 恩师:寒心、天选 好兄弟:勿辞、宇少 徒弟:江辞 一切皆有可能 主频道 @CSWJNB666 交流群 @CSGWJHG |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 28 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CSWJNB666 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 62 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 62 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 60 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 March 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 623 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟 小昼互推 接纳各种小频道 请不要删除此信息否则取消互推资格 1. 熬夜 2. 和平78\REX直装官方频道 3. 王者荣耀小土豆直装 4. 七夜改文件官方频道🇨🇳 5. AS cheat MOD 🇨🇳 4\.5 6. RKR直装官方频道 7. 陈少改文件主频道 8. 小宇皮肤号🇨🇳 9. 寒冰数据号 10. 李宁公益官方🇨🇳 11. 无缘公益项目频道 12. 秋雨账号 和平账号 其他账号 13. 川少\(免费数据号\) 14. 弥海砂八级号 15. 黑夜的窝 📌 共 85 个频道加入互推 📄 第 1/6 页
X
陈少8.8最新思路密钥内透[修复封号密钥6倍放大稳定裸奔] 😂作者：陈少 🎮支持游戏：和平精英 😙禁止🚫二改 💤禁止🚫倒卖 ✅侦察兵白色 ✅突击兵紫色 ✅特种兵黄色 ✅指挥官红色 ✅企鹅群:519591837 ✅发布频道 @CSWJNB13 🔔使用不反馈sm 🔔反馈联系 @CSFKH13 🔕二改倒卖4000+ 获取链接:https://549.uc0.cn/shop/CSWJNB13
❤2
陈少改文件主频道 pinned «陈少8.6最新密钥内透(稳定裸奔版本) 👉对应功能:👇 ✅侦察兵白色 ✅突击兵紫色 ✅特种兵黄色 ✅指挥官红色 ✅发布频道 @CSWJNB13 🔔使用不反馈sm 🔔反馈联系 @CSFKH13 获取链接:https://549.uc0.cn/shop/CSWJNB13»
陈少8.6最新密钥内透(稳定裸奔版本) 👉对应功能:👇 ✅侦察兵白色 ✅突击兵紫色 ✅特种兵黄色 ✅指挥官红色 ✅发布频道 @CSWJNB13 🔔使用不反馈sm 🔔反馈联系 @CSFKH13 获取链接:https://549.uc0.cn/shop/CSWJNB13
Posted without readable text
Photo, posted without a caption
大概效果图❤️
和平8.2最新密钥透 功能： 全密钥内透 密钥放大 侦察兵(白) 突击兵(绿) 特种兵(蓝) 指挥官(紫) 修复和谐
如果不行，我甘愿从头再来！
并且还能再火吗？😭
要不要回归？
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CSWJNB666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
要不要回归？
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
要不要回归？
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 91,957 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 66 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@CSWJNB666 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“陈少改文件主频道” (@CSWJNB666), 62 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CSWJNB666.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.