Channel
@yetakchi_notes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
534subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001439831774 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yetakchi_notes |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yetakchi_notes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 534 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 535 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 535 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
562 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 221 | 39.3% | |
| 😁 | 88 | 15.7% | |
| 🔥 | 86 | 15.3% | |
| ❤ | 44 | 7.83% | |
| ⚡ | 37 | 6.58% | |
| 🤣 | 26 | 4.63% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 2.85% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 2.14% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 1.25% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.89% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 0.89% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.534% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.534% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.356% | |
| 🎅 | 2 | 0.356% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.356% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.356% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.178% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 562 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2024 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yetakchi_notes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 August 2024 to 1 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Bugun Yaponiyada hamma 1 yoshga katta bo’ldi! Bilsangiz, 1-aprel Yaponiyadagi barcha tashkilotlarda yangi kalendar yili boshlanish kuni. Katta o’g’lim ham bog’chasida bugundan oxirgi yil, bitiruvchi guruhga o’tdi. Kecha ota-o’g’il gaplashib o’tirib, liderlik haqida o’rgatdim. Yilning o’rtasida tug’ilgani uchun, yapon o’quv sistemasiga ko’ra o’zidan deyarli 1 yosh kichiklar bilan bir guruhda yuradi. Bu haqida 1-mart…
👍16💯4❤3
Nega bilganlarimizga amal qilmaymiz? Kecha bir guruh ziyoli va ilm egalari bilan bir davrada bo’lish baxti nasib qildi. Va albatta, davra qatnashchilaridan biri yuqoridagi savol bilan murojaat qildi. Savolga savol bilan javob berildi: O’rganayotgan ilmingizning egasi haqqiga hech duo qilganmisiz? Shu lahzadan boshlab, o’rganadigan har qanday foydali ilm uchun uning egasi haqqiga duo qilib qo’yishlikni vazifa qilib…
⚡15❤9👍1
Assalomu aleykum azizlar! Qayerda qolgandik?😊 🟩@yetakchi_notes
🔥14👏6😱4🍾2🏆2
2 dona gapning kuchi. Yangi yilni hamma o’z madaniyatidan kelib chiqib har xil boshlasa kerak. Lekin umumiy olib qaraganda deyarli barcha davlatlarda yangi yilda birinchi marotaba ko’rishgan tanishlariga “Yangi yil bilan tabriklayman” deb aytsa kerak. Yaponlarda esa biroz boshqacha. “Yangi yil bilan tabriklayman!” degan gapga yana bir ajoyib gapni qo’shib aytishadi: “今年も宜しくお願いします!” (O’qilishi: kotoshimo yoroshiku …
⚡17👍11❤2🙏2❤🔥1👏1
Yaponlar 3 yoshgacha nimalarni o’rgatishni muhim deb biladi?! O’tgan yili eng ko’p o’qilgan postimda bu haqida qisman yozib o’tgandim. Bu safar biroz to’liqroq ulashmoqchiman. Bir necha qismli post bo’lishi ham mumkin. Yaponlar nafaqat davlat o’laroq ichki madaniyatda, qolaversa millat o’laroq boshqa davlatlarga borsa ham o’sha madaniyatni, tartibni namoyon qilishini juda ko’p xalqaro musobaqalarda guvohi bo’lganmi…
👍11🔥4❤1❤🔥1😱1
Yanvar - kam harajat oy. Statistikalarga ko’ra, har yili yanvar oyidagi oilaviy harajatlar keskin kamayar ekan.(Katta ehtimol bilan yillik moliyaviy maqsad qo’yilganda shunga amal qilish uchun bo’lsa kerak) Fevral oyidan boshlab yana harajatlar ko’payar ekan. Shu gapni ayolimga aytsam, ayolim: 🧕🏻 1-kuni bolalarni aylantirgani olib boraylik? Oldin bormagan joyi… Baribir fevraldan yana harajatlarimiz ko’payarkanku😂…
👍16🤣10❤1
Sarhisob! Bundan deyarli 3 yil oldin, o’zimning kichik oilam bilan yangi yilni bayram sifatida nishonlashni to’xtatdik. Bunga sabab - boshida shunchaki Yaponiyada u darajada yangi yil shukuhi, bayram kayfiyati yo’qligi sabab bo’lgan bo’lsa, 1 yil o’tib diniy, insoniy va farzand tarbiyasi bilan bog’liq boshqa sabablar bu qarorimizni yanada mustahkamladi. Yil davomida yeyilmaydigan taomlarni aynan shu kuni ertalabda…
👍26🔥12👎5❤🔥4❤3🎅2
Bir narsani kuzatdim. Amerikaga ketgan tanishlarim, amerikaliklarga o’xshab ketmaydi. Germaniyaga ketgan tanishlarim, nemislarga o’xshab ketmaydi. Lekin. Koreyaga ketgan tanishlarim, g’irt karis bo’lib qoladiya negadir. Sochlar o’zgacha, kiyinish o’zgacha.
😁33🤣16👍4❤1
Dardimiz bir! Jismonan kelishgan va sog’lom bo’lish holatiga - fitness deyiladi. Va jismonan sog’lom va kelishgan qomatga ega bo’lish hammamizni dardimiz. Fitness bilan doimiy shug’ullana boshlaganimga yaqinda 2 oy bo’ladi. Shu vaqt ichida intizom, mas’uliyat va tanamga nisbatan bo’lgan g’amxo’rlik 2 barobar o’sdi desam yolg’on bo’lmaydi. Sog’lom ovqatlanish, ovqatlanishdagi tartib va kerakli uyqu har kunlik fitne…
🔥9👍7❤1💯1
Eng yoqimli va samarali texnika! Kun o’rtasida uyqingiz kelsa uyquni yo’qotish uchun Energy Drink ichasizmi? Yoki kofe ichib olasizmi? Yoki shunchaki biroz uxlab olasizmi? Ilmiy izlanishlar esa Coffee-Nap usulini eng samarali deb ko’rsatadi. Ya’ni, Kofe ichib keyin biroz uxlashni (ilmiy jihatdan isbotlangan energiya oshirish usuli). Tadqiqotlar shuni ko'rsatadiki, uyqusi yetishmayotgan insonlarga bir chashka kofe…
🔥24👍13❤1👏1
Menejment sohasida kerakli eng muhim ko’kinmalar qaysi? 5 yil oldin birinchi marta professional darajadagi jamoani boshqarish vazifasiga o’tdim. O’zimcha yetakchilik qobilyatim bor, jamoa boshqarishda qandaydir tajribalar yig’ganman, lekin qanday qilib kuchli Menejer bo’lishni bilmayman. Birinchi qilgan ishim - bu kompaniyadagi men 2 yildan keyin erishmoqchi bo’lgan natijaga erishgan xodimni topish va uni o’zimga m…
👍6🔥4❤2
Nega eslatma yozishning murakkab usulini tark etishingiz va asrlar davomida amalda bo‘lib kelgan usulga o‘tishingiz kerak?! Har doim to’g’ri qayd olish va ma’lumotlardan to’g’ri vaqtda tizimli foydalanish masalasida qiynalib kelganman. PARA, Zettelkasten, Bullet journaling... Bu usullardan qaysidir paytlar foydalanib ham ko’rganman. Va bu meni asrlar davomida amalda bo‘lib kelgan va eslatma yozishning har qachongid…
👍17❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yetakchi_notes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Oramizda necha foiz odam elektron pochta (E-mail)dan foydalanamiz?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2024 to 1 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Xurshid Saidmuhammad | Notes” (@yetakchi_notes), 534 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yetakchi_notes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.