Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Slow Bloom

@ydpoe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

250subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001239395824
TypeChannel
Username@ydpoe
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ydpoe

Growth

249250249.58 Aug 2026, 04:15 — 249 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:32 — 249 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 20:02 — 250 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:158 Aug 2026, 20:02
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 249–250 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 20:02250+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:32249no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:15249first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.0%
avg views ÷ 250 subscribers
Avg views / post
95.1
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (26 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,806
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 10 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC187 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«الفرد الصيني متفائل ومحب للحياة الأرضية التي يجد فيها الغاية المثلى للوجود في هذا العالم؛ ولذلك فإن الحياة الأخرى لم تعن له كثيرًا، وكانت فلسفته فلسفة مجتمع وأخلاق وعلاقات إنسانية، لا فلسفة أخرويات من بعثٍ وقيامة وحساب وجنة وجحيم. وهذا ما عناه كونفوشيوس عندما سأله أحد التلاميذ عن معنى الموت فقال له: (إنك لم تفهم بعد معنى الحياة، فكيف لك أن تفهم معنى الموت؟) وكذلك الأمر عندما سأله عن ماهية الأرواح وكيف نستطيع خدمتها؟

5

7 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC45 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«أنا لا أعرف بعد ما هو الحق، ولكنني في الوقت نفسه أعرف أنني لا أعرف على عكس الكثيرين.» فراس السواح، الله والكون والإنسان.

2

4 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC65 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

لم أرع أيَّ قطعان قطّ، لكن يبدو كما لو أنني رعيتها. روحي أشبه بالرّاعي تعرف الشمسَ والريح من يَدِ الفصولِ تمضي ناظرة تواصل المضيّ. سلام الطبيعة بلا بشر إليَّ يأتي للجلوسِ بجانبي لكنّني حزينا أغدو تجاه التخيّل مثل غروب الشمس. عندما يدبّ النشاط في أعماق البطحاء ويكون الليل قد تسلّل مثل فراشة عبر النافذة غير أنّ حزني هدوءٌ كلّه لأنّه طبيعيّ وصحيح ولأنّه هو ما يجب أن يعتري الروح عندما تفكّر أنها موجودة بينما يدايَ بلا وع

1

4 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC66 viewsread 8 August 2026

«ليست أزمة المدرسة الجزائرية، في نظري، أزمة لغة، بل أزمة بوصلة. والفرق بينهما شاسع. فمن السهل أن نغيّر لغة كتاب، وأن نستبدل الفرنسية بالإنجليزية أو العكس، ولكن من المستحيل أن نُنتج أمةً حية بمجرد تغيير القاموس. اللغة وعاء، أما الإنسان فهو المحتوى. وإذا كان الوعاء جديدًا والمحتوى متآكلًا، فلن يتغيّر شيء. كلما سمعت النقاش يدور حول الفرنسية والإنجليزية، أشعر وكأننا نناقش لون ستائر بيتٍ تتصدع أساساته. المدرسة العمومية ل

1 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC80 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hajar625Photo

هي تعيش بهدوء تام، بلا أية ارتباطات، كمثل جنين داخل قنينة. المنزل العقيم، والبحر الذي اختُزل في صورة، يفتح أمامها منافذ عديدة للدخول. الحزن والغضب، اللذان طردتهما بعيدا، يتركانها أخيرا.. تعيش وحيدة. المستقبل نورس رمادي يغمغم، كمواء القط، عن الرحيل، والرعب — سيلفيا بلاث

4

27 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC119 viewsread 8 August 2026

From this day on Until the end of time I'll count and monitor the flaws that corrupt and foul my mind I'll seek to grow Although, although Right now I'm real low So tomorrow Or perhaps the day after that

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ydpoe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 198,121 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Slow Bloom” (@ydpoe), 250 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ydpoe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.