Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

10

@ten10n

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

510subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001816839307
TypeChannel
Username@ten10n
DescriptionVelvet Noise 🌻 @UPbaraa236BOT
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ten10n

Growth

5107 Aug 2026, 19:01 — 510 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:05 — 510 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:018 Aug 2026, 04:05
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 509–511 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 04:05510no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:01510first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.8%
avg views ÷ 510 subscribers
Avg views / post
152
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (25 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,739
Reactions total135
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,690
Videos
231
Links
144

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 17s
Average length
1m 17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

135 reactions across 18 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘135100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC58 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ydpoe

«الفرد الصيني متفائل ومحب للحياة الأرضية التي يجد فيها الغاية المثلى للوجود في هذا العالم؛ ولذلك فإن الحياة الأخرى لم تعن له كثيرًا، وكانت فلسفته فلسفة مجتمع وأخلاق وعلاقات إنسانية، لا فلسفة أخرويات من بعثٍ وقيامة وحساب وجنة وجحيم. وهذا ما عناه كونفوشيوس عندما سأله أحد التلاميذ عن معنى الموت فقال له: (إنك لم تفهم بعد معنى الحياة، فكيف لك أن تفهم معنى الموت؟) وكذلك الأمر عندما سأله عن ماهية الأرواح وكيف نستطيع خدمتها؟

💘6

Signed Baraa Wafi

7 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC79 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

وَقَلْبُكِ الْقِنْدِيلُ لَمَّا يَزَلْ يَرْسُمُ فَجْرًا بِالسَّنَا الْأَرْوَعِ

💘6

Signed Baraa Wafi

6 Aug 2026, 23:48 UTC115 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

إنّ الإحسانَ والنيّة الحسنة كالهلال وإتمامهما يُشبه تحوّلَ الهلالِ إلى بَدْر تمام، حماكم الحقُّ تعالى من قُطّاعِ طريق الظاهر وقطاع طريق الباطن، خذَلهم الله، الذين لا يريدون إنسانًا طيبًا، ويريدون من كلّ إنسان أن يكون مثلهم منقلبًا يائسًا. مَنْ كان لديه ضعفٌ في الطّبع لا يُريدُ لأِحَدٍ أن يكون صحيحًا مُعافى وإنَّ الشيطان الخفي والإنسانَ الشيطانيَّ الصّفات وُلاةٌ معزولون وحُسّادٌ ويقطعون طريقَ الخير على الإنسان بمئات

💘9

Signed Baraa Wafi

6 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC105 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

هَذِهِ لَفْظَةٌ جَامِعَةٌ تَشْتَمِلُ عَلَى مَعَانٍ شَتَّى؛ فَكَمَا لَا يَنْفَعُ الِاجْتِهَادُ بِغَيْرِ تَوْفِيقٍ، وَلَا الجَمَالُ بِغَيْرِ حَلَاوَةٍ، وَلَا السُّرُورُ بِغَيْرِ أَمْنٍ، كَذَلِكَ لَا يَنْفَعُ العَقْلُ بِغَيْرِ وَرَعٍ، وَلَا الحِفْظُ بِغَيْرِ عَمَلٍ، وَكَمَا أَنَّ السُّرُورَ تَبَعٌ لِلْأَمْنِ، وَالقَرَابَةَ تَبَعٌ لِلْمَوَدَّةِ، كَذَلِكَ المُرُوءَاتُ كُلُّهَا تَبَعٌ لِلْعَقْلِ، وَعُقُولُ كُلِّ قَوْمٍ عَل

💘7

Signed Baraa Wafi

6 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC106 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💘7

Signed Baraa Wafi

31 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC164 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ولا تكون النعمة سابغة ولا الأيدي شاملة ولا الستر كثيفًا ذيَّالًا وكثير العرض مطبقًا ودون الفقر حاجزًا وعلى الغِنى ملتحفًا، حتى يُخرج من عند كريمٍ حُرٍّ ثم يُحتسَب إلى شاكرٍ حُر. رسائل الجاحظ

💘8

Signed Baraa Wafi

30 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTC195 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💘10

Signed Baraa Wafi

27 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTC225 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

من مناجاة الأئمّة عليهم السلام: هَبْ لِي كَمالَ الانْقِطاعِ إِلَيْكَ وَأَنِرْ أَبْصارَ قُلُوبِنا بِضِياءِ نَظَرِها إِلَيْكَ حَتَّى تَخْرِقَ أَبْصارُ الْقُلُوبِ حُجُبَ النُّورِ فَتَصِلَ إِلَى مَعْدِنِ الْعَظَمَةِ وَتَصِيرَ أَرْواحُنا مُعَلَّقَةً بِعِزِّ قُدْسِكَ.

💘9

Signed Baraa Wafi

27 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC208 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

There are those people who try to elevate their souls like someone who continually jumps from a standing position in the hope that forcing oneself to jump all day- and higher every day- they would no longer fall back down, but rise to heaven. Thus occupied, they no longer look to heaven. We cannot even take one step toward heaven. The vertical direction is forbidden to us. But if we look to heaven long-term, God desc

💘8

Signed Baraa Wafi

26 Jul 2026, 21:43 UTC170 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Simone Weil at Lycée Henri IV, 1926

💘6

Signed Baraa Wafi

26 Jul 2026, 21:15 UTC164 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ioqa8File

File, posted without a caption

💘6

Signed Baraa Wafi

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ten10n. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“10” (@ten10n), 510 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ten10n.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.