Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Yassikhatibi

Channel

Yassikhatibi

@yassikhatibi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,585subscribers

+7,535 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002166942021
TypeChannel
Username@yassikhatibi
Descriptionبه کانال تلگرام من خوش اومدید😍 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/yassikhatibi?igsh=MWY5bWQ2c2Q0eXAxZQ== Youtube: https://youtube.com/@yasamankhatibi?si=UPFMKbN8SYxFVT7t لینک ناشناس: @YassiKhatibiUnknownBot
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yassikhatibi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22,05029,58525,817.57 August 2026 — 22,050 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,050 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,654 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,812 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,969 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,105 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,081 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,435 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,570 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,618 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,614 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,593 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,696 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,688 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,620 subscribers23 August 2026 — 23,563 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,521 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,484 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,450 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,675 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,937 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,131 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,112 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,094 subscribers1 September 2026 — 24,034 subscribers2 September 2026 — 24,024 subscribers3 September 2026 — 23,970 subscribers5 September 2026 — 23,868 subscribers9 September 2026 — 23,886 subscribers11 September 2026 — 23,994 subscribers13 September 2026 — 23,989 subscribers15 September 2026 — 26,824 subscribers17 September 2026 — 27,174 subscribers19 September 2026 — 27,193 subscribers26 September 2026 — 29,585 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net +7,535. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,920–30,715 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 23:4129,585+2,392
19 Sept 2026, 17:2027,193+19
17 Sept 2026, 07:5527,174+350
15 Sept 2026, 10:0026,824+2,835
13 Sept 2026, 17:2223,989-5
11 Sept 2026, 19:4223,994+108
9 Sept 2026, 05:1523,886+18
5 Sept 2026, 20:5723,868-102
3 Sept 2026, 20:4123,970-54
2 Sept 2026, 15:2524,024-10
1 Sept 2026, 14:0424,034-60
31 Aug 2026, 16:3424,094-18
30 Aug 2026, 18:4424,112-19
29 Aug 2026, 15:4524,131+194
28 Aug 2026, 19:1423,937+262
27 Aug 2026, 21:2323,675+225
27 Aug 2026, 00:3823,450-34
26 Aug 2026, 03:1623,484-37
25 Aug 2026, 00:2823,521-42
23 Aug 2026, 13:5723,563first reading

Engagement

587 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.0%
avg views ÷ 29,585 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,860
146 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
146
of 587 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held587 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total1,293,892
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Sept 2026, 08:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,110
Videos
≈648
Links
≈677

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 52s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 07:54 UTC≈16,600 viewsread 28 September 2026

شوهر دوستمه اون دست ریچارد نیست

Showing the 12 most recent of 587 posts we hold for @yassikhatibi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

USY
@usychannel · 19,997
#1
Diyyaanaa
@diyyaanaa · 3,263
#2
Life of a havij 🥕
@lifeofahavij · 19,697
#3
همکلاسی
@hamclasixii · 76
#4
‌ ‌ ‌‌‌ ‌ 𝐑𝐄𝐁𝐄𝐂𝐂𝐀𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑𝐈
@rebccaghaderi · 275,127
#5
parmidamamaghani
@parmidamamaghani · 41,010
#6
NeginFit
@Neginworkout · 6,842
#7
‌ 𝑀𝐴𝑅𝐼𝐸𝐻 𝑀𝐼𝑅
@mariehmim · 15,758
#8
He1iya
@he1iyaa · 49,467
#9
Vinyv
@vinyvidzam · 61,959
#10
Serotonin 🖤
@llfreak · 222,340
#11
SOGANG🕊️
@sogangyt · 85,881
#12
Rap King
@rapking · 308,288
#13
Safe house
@amirmohammadFASHI · 2,493
#14
S A D A F 🐚🐳
@sadafsoltaani · 1,922
#15
iRo Proxy | پروکسی
@iRoProxy · 7,909,421
#16
نیکی و دوستان💅🏻
@niktamokhtariii · 6,110
#17
Mehrab🪐
@bymehrab · 7,471
#18
kill ourselves
@letskills · 84,622
#19
BOBBY👁️
@bobbychanell · 2,522
#20
Bhn
@behniyaabt · 5,763
#21
پارس توییت
@ParsTwt · 502,853
#22
تو بگو:
@YouBgo · 100,135
#23
Pareeaa
@paareeaa · 8,476
#24
Melikaazizi_ravanshenas
@melikaazizi_ravanshsnas · 3,941
#25
Verse Vibes| 🖤
@Lyricsteach · 40,927
#26
𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖻ɘ𝖺𝗍 .
@istarbeat · 23,793
#27
Mahshid
@mahshidyonesi · 1,772
#28
𓄼𝓦𝙝𝙞𝙩𝙚 𝓯𝙚𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙜𝙨
@White_feelingg · 6,265
#29
ارسالی‌هاتون :
@Ersalihatun · 138,637 (as read 15 September 2026)
#30
محافظ YanPlays
@MakeYourCharacter · 1,296
#31
C ya
@yacitchannel · 16,799
#32
Wantonstor
@wantonstor · 1,853
#33
WE D!E IN SILENCE
@idiewith · 173,473
#34
maybe us.
@xbeus · 19,163
#35
˓𝐄𝗱𝗶-𝐑𝗲𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗰𝗮
@edirebecca · 4,104
#36
"چیپس مزمز"
@mazmazpill · 22 (as read 15 September 2026)
#37
Pat & Mat
@paTt_Maatt · 103 (as read 15 September 2026)
#38
yexxxo
@yexoelred · 4,538
#39
دلقکِ عنکبوتی
@spiiderclown · 100,590
#40
Ava’s home 🚪
@chummyava · 1,905
#41
RegaPlus
@RegaPlus · 1,474,377
#42
The D
@thedelfam · 5,809
#43
POV
@samepov · 48,973
#44
Ashkan Kagan
@ashkan_kagan · 118,231
#45
Inner light
@nightwatchmannn · 1,429 (as read 15 September 2026)
#46
﮼کدئین
@Codeain · 339,457
#47
RARA
@rassttaaaa1 · 40,546
#48
Arta
@residambetashh · 53,765
#49
RapCity
@rapcity · 81,867
#50
koorowsh
@koorowshOfficial · 109,407
#51
تاک
@talllllllllllk · 73,107
#52
𝗖𝗼𝗰𝗼𝗮
@coucoa · 113,061
#53

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

He1iya
@he1iyaa · 49,467
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 August 2026
‌ ‌ ‌‌‌ ‌ 𝐑𝐄𝐁𝐄𝐂𝐂𝐀𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑𝐈
@rebccaghaderi · 275,127
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
ꜱᴀʜᴀʀ ʜᴏꜱᴇɪɴɪ♡
@saharhoseiinii · 77,371
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 18 August 2026
Mehrnvzz
@mehrnvzzz · 33,370
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 2 September 2026
SOGANG🕊️
@sogangyt · 85,881
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
𝐀𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐚 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐢 🎙♡
@anita_natalini · 23,392
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 September 2026
KHOTAN
@khotaaan · 32,518
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
Ali safari
@Ali_safari_76 · 20,813
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 24 September 2026
Neginjavaheri🩵
@neginjavaheriii · 104,980
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 14 August 2026
اشکان شادکامی
@ashkan_shadkami · 166,827
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐙𝐀𝐋
@ghazallchanel · 50,648
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 25 August 2026
𝔰𝔬𝔤𝔞𝔫𝔡🦋
@Absurdwolrd · 68,944
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 August 2026
𝕒𝕤𝕙𝕚🤍𝕝𝕖𝕪
@Ashi_ley · 213,555
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
Arta
@residambetashh · 53,765
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Yassikhatibi” (@yassikhatibi), 29,585 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yassikhatibi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.