Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RARA

Channel

RARA

@rassttaaaa1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

40,546subscribers

+9,340 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002105558387
TypeChannel
Username@rassttaaaa1
Descriptionبرای رزرو تبلیغات ( فقط با گیفت ) @rastadmin به این ایدی تکس بدین لینک ناشناس: t.me/safeCht_bot?start=RARAbot https://youtube.com/@rassttaaa_s?si=NVRcjMBmPGrAmtfY
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rassttaaaa1

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

31,20640,54635,8767 August 2026 — 31,206 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,206 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,320 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,394 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,562 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,938 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,943 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,483 subscribers14 August 2026 — 33,709 subscribers16 August 2026 — 34,005 subscribers17 August 2026 — 33,979 subscribers18 August 2026 — 34,323 subscribers19 August 2026 — 34,343 subscribers20 August 2026 — 34,360 subscribers21 August 2026 — 34,291 subscribers22 August 2026 — 34,239 subscribers24 August 2026 — 34,469 subscribers25 August 2026 — 34,608 subscribers26 August 2026 — 34,730 subscribers27 August 2026 — 34,695 subscribers28 August 2026 — 34,664 subscribers29 August 2026 — 34,752 subscribers30 August 2026 — 34,871 subscribers31 August 2026 — 35,035 subscribers1 September 2026 — 35,163 subscribers2 September 2026 — 35,201 subscribers3 September 2026 — 35,480 subscribers5 September 2026 — 35,605 subscribers8 September 2026 — 36,206 subscribers11 September 2026 — 39,664 subscribers13 September 2026 — 40,257 subscribers14 September 2026 — 40,314 subscribers16 September 2026 — 40,463 subscribers18 September 2026 — 40,546 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net +9,340. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,805–41,947 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:3640,546+83
16 Sept 2026, 09:3840,463+149
14 Sept 2026, 18:3940,314+57
13 Sept 2026, 07:5940,257+593
11 Sept 2026, 11:1739,664+3,458
8 Sept 2026, 17:5736,206+601
5 Sept 2026, 13:5935,605+125
3 Sept 2026, 18:5635,480+279
2 Sept 2026, 11:4635,201+38
1 Sept 2026, 11:0635,163+128
31 Aug 2026, 08:3635,035+164
30 Aug 2026, 11:3534,871+119
29 Aug 2026, 11:1934,752+88
28 Aug 2026, 08:5434,664-31
27 Aug 2026, 11:0934,695-35
26 Aug 2026, 12:5834,730+122
25 Aug 2026, 10:1734,608+139
24 Aug 2026, 07:2534,469+230
22 Aug 2026, 15:0634,239-52
21 Aug 2026, 07:5534,291first reading

Engagement

1,663 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.05%
avg views ÷ 40,546 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,670
848 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
851
of 1,663 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 836 of 848 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held1,663 (7 August 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total3,111,149
Reactions total39,472
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Sept 2026, 15:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,810
Videos
≈955
Links
≈1,650

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 07s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

44,777 reactions across 981 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘14,46432.3%
🔥9,33320.8%
💋6,66814.9%
🍓3,9708.87%
😍3,9478.81%
🐳3,8778.66%
❤‍🔥2,5185.62%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 983 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44,777 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
59
across the posts below
Posts paid on
45
of 996 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rassttaaaa1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2026, 15:11 UTC546 views19 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

همچو یه کوزت دارم کار میکنم

💘16💋3

Signed رستآ

28 Sept 2026, 14:31 UTC≈2,150 views9 reactionsread 28 September 2026

رابطتت لانگه بیااا

😍8❤‍🔥1

Signed R

28 Sept 2026, 14:13 UTC≈2,750 views9 reactionsread 28 September 2026

قوانین رابطه لانگ :

😍8❤‍🔥1

Signed R

28 Sept 2026, 13:39 UTC≈4,200 views148 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

خرید خونه✨

🔥120💘13🍓6😍5🐳2❤‍🔥1💋1

Signed رستآ

28 Sept 2026, 13:39 UTC≈4,200 views98 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥88🐳5❤‍🔥4😍1

Signed رستآ

28 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC≈4,170 views106 reactionsread 28 September 2026

بچه ها این مدت خیلی نیستم چون مدل درسیم و زبانی که دارم باهاش درس میخونم عوض شده خیلی سرم شلوغ شده فعالیتمو دارم ولی خیلی شلوغم🤍

🔥92🍓6💘5❤‍🔥2🐳1

Signed رستآ

28 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC≈6,580 views29 reactionsread 28 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

💘22🔥6❤‍🔥1

Signed رستآ

28 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC≈7,800 views32 reactionsread 28 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

💘29❤‍🔥3

Signed رستآ

28 Sept 2026, 06:17 UTC≈8,200 views157 reactionsread 28 September 2026

باز آمد بوی ماه مدرسه بعد از سالها

🐳145❤‍🔥5😍4🍓2💘1

Signed رستآ

28 Sept 2026, 06:16 UTC≈8,160 views218 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💘187🍓13💋11❤‍🔥5🐳2

Signed رستآ

28 Sept 2026, 06:14 UTC≈8,010 views86 reactionsread 28 September 2026

دارم میرم مدرسه

❤‍🔥74😍5🍓4💘3

Signed رستآ

28 Sept 2026, 06:14 UTC≈7,970 views74 reactionsread 28 September 2026

سلام

💋67🍓4❤‍🔥2💘1

Signed رستآ

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,663 posts we hold for @rassttaaaa1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Sept 2026, 12:46 UTCAnonymous Poll159 voters

شماهم تعطیل شدیددددد؟؟

  1. ارههه23%
  2. وایسااا چک کنمممم78%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Sept 2026, 15:45 UTCAnonymous Poll1,550 voters approx.

پاهامو چی بزنم

  1. سفید59%
  2. قرمز48%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTCAnonymous Poll1,170 voters approx.

چه رنگی

  1. سیاه58%
  2. طوسی49%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

بآران”
@bawranamm · 139,114
#1
Eli
@elaaykarimi · 3,083
#2
سوگی
@soogowu · 97,408
#3
Serotonin 🖤
@llfreak · 222,340
#4
You
@mahdinwee · 12,260
#5
ابر
@urcloudi2222 · 74,177
#6
‌ ‌ ‌‌‌ ‌ 𝐑𝐄𝐁𝐄𝐂𝐂𝐀𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑𝐈
@rebccaghaderi · 275,127
#7
RegaPlus
@RegaPlus · 1,474,377
#8
چنل پدرت
@pedaretdiana · 49,378
#9
ستی”
@satawetayi · 2,105
#10
𝗂𝗍'𝗌 𝖡𝖱𝖴𝖳𝖠𝖫 𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾
@aisjunkie · 824
#11
kill ourselves
@letskills · 84,622
#12
Vinyv
@vinyvidzam · 61,959
#13
𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖻ɘ𝖺𝗍 .
@istarbeat · 23,793
#14
محافظ
@starme69 · 26
#15
تو بگو:
@YouBgo · 100,135
#16
Verse Vibes| 🖤
@Lyricsteach · 40,927
#17
POV
@samepov · 48,973
#18
مونچایلدز
@borntobmoonchild · 1,838
#19
𝐒𝐞𝐯𝐢
@SeviHopss · 14,997
#20
Tempest
@Loserbunnyyy · 3,212
#21
Nushi"
@nooshikae · 25,399
#22
maybe us.
@xbeus · 19,163
#23
تاک
@talllllllllllk · 73,107
#24
Mary latin
@marychanelll · 4,952
#25
دارک پروکسی | Proxy mtproto
@darkproxy · 4,702,475
#26
WE D!E IN SILENCE
@idiewith · 173,473
#27
555”
@batorg11 · 8,653
#28
دلقکِ عنکبوتی
@spiiderclown · 100,590
#29
پارس توییت
@ParsTwt · 502,853
#30
﮼کدئین
@Codeain · 339,457
#31
‎ Chérie
@asallweo · 27,607
#32
AYRIN
@ayrinxmm · 9,934
#33
هانی
@honeeyami · 10,464
#34
𝐧𝐫𝐜𝐛𝐚𝐛𝐲𝐬
@nrcbaeby · 5,324
#35
Crying room
@crayingroom · 290,469
#36
everyone obsessed with song lyric's
@Beustaa · 18,590
#37
I'll DIE YOUNG 🪱
@WryVur · 138,803
#38
AtiS
@atismzf · 34,659
#39
Bhn
@behniyaabt · 5,763
#40
iRo Proxy | پروکسی
@iRoProxy · 7,909,421
#41
Rap King
@rapking · 308,288
#42
Inner light
@nightwatchmannn · 1,454 (as read 2 September 2026)
#43
Ashkan Kagan
@ashkan_kagan · 118,231
#44
Soni’s home🐈‍⬛
@soniihom · 15,118
#45

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Selena Dance🌙
@selenatel · 21,960
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 21 September 2026
watsmusic
@watsmusicc · 37,693
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 8 September 2026
FATI
@fatitajikam · 89,486
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 21 August 2026
سوگی
@soogowu · 97,408
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 17 August 2026
ابر
@urcloudi2222 · 74,177
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 August 2026
Saghar🌚
@saqarrrr11 · 65,477
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 September 2026
AtiS
@atismzf · 34,659
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 5 September 2026
SOOHWIL
@soohwyxl · 23,678
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 18 September 2026
Trust Who ?
@saministamm · 258,131
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 24 September 2026
Yassikhatibi
@yassikhatibi · 29,585
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 September 2026
KHOTAN
@khotaaan · 32,518
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
SOGANG🕊️
@sogangyt · 85,881
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RARA” (@rassttaaaa1), 40,546 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rassttaaaa1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.