Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Яруш

@yarush42

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

188subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001296451324
TypeChannel
Username@yarush42
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yarush42

Growth

1781881836 August 2026 — 178 subscribers7 August 2026 — 179 subscribers8 August 2026 — 179 subscribers13 August 2026 — 188 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 177–190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:37188+9
8 Aug 2026, 13:16179no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:16179+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:52178first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.8%
avg views ÷ 188 subscribers
Avg views / post
97.3
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (24 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,654
Reactions total237
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

237 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10343.5%
😁2811.8%
custom 52693251315487295282611.0%
custom 5289742671634516126187.59%
custom 5458682663307057981125.06%
custom 5460677478047554090114.64%
🍓93.80%
custom 524681406119413132483.38%
🔥83.38%
custom 533047791099630088341.69%
41.69%
💔41.69%
😭20.844%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC37 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хорошее стихотворение хорошо тем, что не может быть не написано. Как ни втаптывай его в землю, оно всё равно прорастёт, с помощью автора или без неё. Вот Василий Розанов — хоть режь его, а за стихи браться не хотел. Писал вместо этого про себя гадости в «Уединённом»: Иду раз по улице. Поднял голову и прочитал: «Немецкая булочная Розанова» Ну, так и есть: все булочники Розановы, и, следовательно, все Розановы — бу

10

7 Aug 2026, 21:49 UTC36 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mempoetryPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

8

6 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC68 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ПИСЬМО СЕЛЬСКОГО ДРУГА морковь и тыква, ягоды и мёд — сыт будешь только тем, что сам взрастил. я лапы окунаю в чернозём, чтоб поздороваться и чтоб проститься с ним. сегодня — морось, завтра заснежи́т. жизнь — огород, заросший сорняками, но даже перед первыми снегами хозяин грядки взглядом сторожит. гармония — когтями землю рыть, под звуки диско закусить травинку в моей избе светильник не горит, гудит пчела, скрипит

15🔥6custom 52693251315487295284

6 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC66 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Спасибо Мише за возможность влезть в шкуру Копатыча!

11custom 54606774780475540902

6 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC46 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @letostationFile

Станция Лето и New Weird Russia представляют… САМЫЙ КРУГЛЫЙ ЗИН! К выходу полнометражного лайв-экшн фильма про Смешариков 12 поэтов написали 12 стихотворений, посвящённых разным персонажам культового сериала. За 22 года «Смешарики» стали больше чем детским мультфильмом: образы из них вошли в культурный код, цитаты стали крылатыми фразами, эпизоды породили множество теорий и стали почвой для философских разборов и

11custom 54606774780475540903custom 52693251315487295282

5 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC78 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

<***> на могилах косят траву кладби́ще на кладби́ще

custom 546067747804755409051

3 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC88 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

<***> прошёлся бритвой оккама по телу — остались только точки и пробелы.

74

3 Aug 2026, 00:22 UTC110 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

...разъято, смешано, разбито... <***> на длинные тире нанизаны слова — бонапети для безъязыких живоглотов. за ужином до неприличия весёлый я не был глух и не был молчалив: нож по тарелке ёрзал, голосило мясо, шампур втыкался остриём под кожу, сочился кровью недожаренный кусок, шипел на дёснах, становился горьким как боль или как память о былом. не ресторан и не кафешантан — столовая на выезде из города, где от зака

6

2 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC103 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

<***> слышу шум упавшего дерева в лесу, который срубили.

5😭2

1 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC114 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я слепил кружку с мопсом, который батонится.

custom 526932513154872952815🍓9custom 54586826633070579814custom 54606774780475540901

29 Jul 2026, 23:46 UTC135 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

<***> Д. С. уходя, не забудь выключить свет. поиграв, собери все свои игрушки. написав свой самый хороший текст, не пиши больше.

6💔4

28 Jul 2026, 23:16 UTC141 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В 2023 году официальный сайт «Липецкпива» с триумфом обновился — дизайнеры навалили модных шрифтов и фоновых видео, на которых пенное смачно льётся в кружку, а мужские руки утопают в ячменном солоде. Красиво, конечно, но без изюминки. То ли дело старый сайт — в безумных жёлто-зелёных цветах и с гостевой книгой, где Сергей Морозов из Бугульмы нахваливал пиво «Приятель Живое», а Наталья из Брянска благодарила за постав

custom 5289742671634516126181

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @yarush42. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 181,395 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Яруш” (@yarush42), 188 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yarush42.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.