Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ИОРХ/поэт

@aiorh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

123subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002006930820
TypeChannel
Username@aiorh
DescriptionПоэт из Новосибирска. Пишу стихи и говорю за поэзию📖 #поэзия #стихи #литература #жизц Музыка🎧 https://music.yandex.com/artist/22093986 Подкастовое🎧https://music.yandex.com/album/33494661 Кошачий цикл: https://vk.com/@iorkha-koshachii-cikl
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/aiorh

Growth

1238 Aug 2026, 13:32 — 123 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 03:16 — 123 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:329 Aug 2026, 03:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 122–124 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 03:16123no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:32123first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.5%
avg views ÷ 123 subscribers
Avg views / post
59.7
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total418
Reactions total40
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
836
Videos
94
Links
167

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

99 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5454.5%
custom 53729794556585669501414.1%
custom 547198945553759949399.09%
🔥99.09%
custom 523547812208156053544.04%
custom 545421950938673607933.03%
❤‍🔥22.02%
🐳22.02%
11.01%
11.01%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC41 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

тут написали наконец понятную инструкцию, все для людей, делюсь с вами роботяги чтобы быть читателями не последнего разряда

3

7 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC34 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @typeofloveeFile

Просьба во время чтения поэтических текстов руководствоваться исключительно данным техническим заданием.

custom 545421950938673607931

6 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC42 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @letostationFile

Станция Лето и New Weird Russia представляют… САМЫЙ КРУГЛЫЙ ЗИН! К выходу полнометражного лайв-экшн фильма про Смешариков 12 поэтов написали 12 стихотворений, посвящённых разным персонажам культового сериала. За 22 года «Смешарики» стали больше чем детским мультфильмом: образы из них вошли в культурный код, цитаты стали крылатыми фразами, эпизоды породили множество теорий и стали почвой для философских разборов и

4❤‍🔥2🔥2🐳1

4 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC51 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

под старым песком или древней водой сокрыты осколки без права на голос однажды наверное кто-то найдет и станет загадкой побольше точнее не так все рисунок игра есть братец такая водица фрагментик в которую с смертью упал а песочек сверху присыпал (упал из суставов) илиста грязь так только куличики делать в которых раскол изначально лежал фрагментом отпавшей вселенной и вот раскопаем покроем в словарь изведаем

custom 5372979455658566950311

25 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC88 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ВСЕВОЛОД ГАРШИН - ГЕОМЕТРИЯ ВОЙНЫ ... Неожиданно для себя открыл Всеволода Гаршина. Меня впечатлило, что он до Чехова обращался к короткой форме, до Андреева использовал экспрессивный монтаж и в целом местами был ближе к практикам XX века. В его Четырех днях угадывается будущий Красный смех и в интонации, и в быстрой расфокусированной нарезке картин и состояний в начале произведения. Я помню, как мы бежали по лесу,

custom 523547812208156053532🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTC119 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

я хотел бы помыслить выше чем мне бы возможно не то чтобы космос и мета а выйти так за пределы взять раздвинуть шторки дождя пройти в прихожую лета где птицы ударят зачем-то клювом по струнам а я прихожу глупо оставлена сцена безмолвия полна но помнят все волны приливы отливы отхлынут под ними узоры расскажут о многом что было (и превратилось в орнамент) чем дальше мысль удалялась тем больше тончалась сжи

8🔥2custom 52354781220815605351

13 Jul 2026, 10:39 UTC116 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

АПОЛОГИЯ БОЖЕСТВЕННОЙ ИЗМЕНЫ ... Пожалуй, здесь, на земле, нет ничего, что столь же высоко возносит человеческую душу, как любовь. Да, любовь — могучая и таинственная сила, способная потрясать и преображать сокровеннейшие основы бытия. Что же удивительного в том, что Дон Жуан именно в земной любви надеялся утолить высшую тоску, терзающую его душу, а дьявол именно здесь и приуготовил ему западню? В сознании Дон Жуана

4🔥3custom 53729794556585669501

6 Jul 2026, 16:29 UTC170 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ДЭПЧИК ДОСТОЕВСКОГО ... Пока лохи смотрят казино стримеров, я читаю сцены Достоевского с дэпами. Все же нужно иметь мощную живородящую писательскую силу, чтобы построить новый мир и биться в конвульсиях восторга около придуманной вариации рулетки. Причем я никогда не мог понять христианский ли принцип шанса и рулетки подпитывал его зависимость, или наоборот игорная лихорадка распаляла религиозное чувство. С одной с

2custom 54719894555375994932

5 Jul 2026, 14:12 UTC159 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

УТКИ ... из под уток ветер рванул одеяло те буровятся складками дальше будто магниты их на поверхность прибили вверяясь завету скользя водомеркой рискуя разводы взбивают лапками солнце что льется лучами (почти что до масла) им бы резвиться и плавать но масло плотнится (все вязнет и вязнет) блики за солнцем шагают как парапланы на нитях будто бы вектор вшили в мерцанье переползанье текстуры а утки что утки лиш

7

29 Jun 2026, 07:40 UTC152 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

День начинается с великой цитаты Жана Жака Руссо🤓 Я вернулся из Италии не совсем таким, каким отправился туда, но каким в моем возрасте никто оттуда, может быть, не возвращался. Я принес оттуда не невинность, а девственность. Я почувствовал смену лет, мой беспокойный темперамент наконец пробудился, и первый взрыв его, ­совершенно невольный, поверг меня в страшную тревогу о своем здоровье, и это лучше, чем что-либо

custom 54719894555375994933

28 Jun 2026, 06:57 UTC116 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

Читание - "вместить своим глазом" #читание

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aiorh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 637,769 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ИОРХ/поэт” (@aiorh), 123 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aiorh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.