Новый день, новый прикол 🙂 🪄 Умная лошадь - это не всегда удобно (а когда их две - тушите свет)
❤17😁9custom 54090613127035191616

Channel
@yanayezdnitsa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
925subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001814600463 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yanayezdnitsa |
| Created | 24 January 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yanayezdnitsa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 925 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 927 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 927 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
360 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 120 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5409061312703519161 | 86 | 23.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 46 | 12.8% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 10.0% | |
| 🙊 | 25 | 6.94% | |
| 😢 | 23 | 6.39% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 2.50% | |
| 😍 | 6 | 1.67% | |
| 🦄 | 5 | 1.39% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 0.556% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.556% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 360reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 10 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Новый день, новый прикол 🙂 🪄 Умная лошадь - это не всегда удобно (а когда их две - тушите свет)
❤17😁9custom 54090613127035191616
Говорят: сначала дом, потом собака... Но после всех моих предостережений про «неготовность к лошади», покажу людей, которые сначала лошадей завели, а теперь успешно строят жизнь вокруг них — Аня и Денис. Вот инсайды от Ани: будьте готовы полностью поменять уклад жизни, получать синяки у стиле «the art/the artist» и проводить большие-большие воспитательные работы. А уж кто кого воспитывает — вопрос открый. Но, полаг…
❤🔥10🔥7❤5😍1
Справедливости ради, недавно мне предложили подарить лошадь. И, знаете, в настоящих условиях это худшая идея эвер. Почему? Несколько вопросов дарителю: 🤩 подойдёт ли она мне? у нас абсолютно разный уровень навыка, амбиции, характер, комплекция, предпочтения — список бесконечен. Вот я всегда мечтала выкупить лошадь с бойни, но понимаю: справлюсь далеко не с любым характером и травмами животного (у меня своих по…
❤22💯1🦄1
Когда я говорю, что совсем нетребовательная, я имею в виду: он сам угадает мои желания — требовать не придётся. И цветы, и лошадь и без очевидного повода раз в год, пожалуйста. Но на деле… тут должен быть мем с Тиньковым, но мы держим планку приличия, верно? Девчачий опрос века: ❤️ — цветы и «огонек» в инсте 🌟— никаких «бла-бла», только конюшня своими руками!
custom 540906131270351916146❤7🔥2💯1
Мою аллергию вызвали вовсе не лошади, а я сама. Ну, и моя вера в «чудо-баночки». На раздражённую холодом кожу я передержала энзимную пудру, затем налепила животворящие (по версии маркетологов) корейские патчи. Вуаля! Три дня боялась подходить к зеркалу. Мораль? Энтузиазм и маркетинг опаснее любых аллергенов. А теперь вопрос знатокам: нужны ли вообще патчи или это коллективный самообман для уставших?
🙊25❤17🔥11😍2
Недавно у меня случилась аллергия. Глаз отёк буквально за несколько часов так, что я не могла его открыть. И хорошо, что не могла — выглядела так, словно сбежала из боди-хоррора. Врач, естественно, назначил анализы на всё живое и неживое. И где-то между берёзовыми серёжками и потом чупакабры значилось: аллерген специфический IgE к перхоти лошади. Где вы видели у лошади перхоть? — подумала я. Она ж не мой школьный со…
😢23❤8❤🔥6🔥3
А что станет причиной уйти?
The shares total 298%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой критерий при выборе конюшни в приоритете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Продолжаю свою мини-разведку! Обещаю использовать данные исключительно во благо⬇️⬇️⬇️
custom 54090613127035191616🔥2
При острых приступах тоски принимать утром и вечером Дозировка свободная, отпускаются без рецепта Побочные эффекты: внезапное желание купить лошадь и начать жить свою лучшую жизнь💡
❤🔥27custom 540906131270351916116❤12😍3
Вот вам, мои уставшие хулиганы, в конце дня интересный факт о Марке Шагале. В юности цыганка нагадала ему смерть «между небом и землёй». Возможно, поэтому в его картинах так часто люди и животные парят в воздухе, зависшие между реальностью и сном? Заинтриговала? Больше о жизни художника с деталями, драмой и неожиданными поворотами найдете здесь. Пс-с... по секрету: за выбором хорошего вина туда же. Но эта блажь тол…
❤19custom 540906131270351916112🔥8❤🔥3
Всё верно — Марк Шагал. На его полотнах люди и лошади взлетают в воздух, коровы играют на скрипке, огромные козы и петухи несутся по улицам, катая на себе цирковых артистов. Абсурд? Сказка? Или сложный язык символов? Говорят, лошадь у Шагала про силу, стремление, внутреннюю энергию. «Говорят» — ключевое слово, наверняка никто не скажет. Сам художник был против прямых трактовок «в лоб». Искусство можно изучать по уч…
❤13🦄4🔥3👻2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @yanayezdnitsa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А что станет причиной уйти?
The shares total 298%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой критерий при выборе конюшни в приоритете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 10 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Наездница” (@yanayezdnitsa), 925 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yanayezdnitsa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.