Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Баночка Лжи

@jar_of_lie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

876subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002512755145
TypeChannel
Username@jar_of_lie
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jar_of_lie

Growth

8768808787 August 2026 — 880 subscribers7 August 2026 — 880 subscribers14 August 2026 — 876 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 875–881 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:35876-4
7 Aug 2026, 10:17880no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:04880first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

505 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22244.0%
🔥10621.0%
😁7314.5%
💯193.76%
183.56%
❤‍🔥173.37%
🥰132.57%
💅112.18%
👍61.19%
🏆50.99%
👌50.99%
🍓40.792%
👏40.792%
😈10.198%
🦄10.198%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 505reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jar_of_lie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 April 2026 to 12 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Jun 2026, 16:23 UTC361 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, давайте разбираться дальше с этим самым SPF? Что правда, а что нет. Миф №1. SPF защищает только от обгорания Не совсем. Есть два типа ультрафиолета: ☀️ UVB — обжигает кожу. ☀️ UVA — не обжигает, зато участвует в появлении пигментации, морщин и фотостарения. Хороший современный SPF защищает и от того, и от другого. Как его выбирать — разберем следующим постом. ⸻ Миф №2. Если SPF 50, можно нанести совс

12💯8🔥6

10 Jun 2026, 07:59 UTC324 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Это нам всем, девочки, все заслужили🥇 Баночка Лжи

9🔥6😁4

9 Jun 2026, 16:51 UTC332 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наверняка вы слышали фразы: «Этот спф хороший на физических фильтрах» или «Тут сильные химические фильтры». О чем идет речь и какие лучше? Физические фильтры — это оксид цинка и диоксид титана. Они редко раздражают кожу, подходят чувствительной, но могут выбеливать лицо и хуже дружить с макияжем. Химические фильтры обычно легче по текстуре, комфортнее в носке и красивее лежат на коже. Но иногда могут раздражат

13🔥8👌5

9 Jun 2026, 14:51 UTC329 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как вы знаете, я душнила. Поэтому сегодня все на свете про SPF. Разберемся немножко в базе и потом как всегда гайд, как выбирать правильно.

14👏4🔥4

9 Jun 2026, 09:33 UTC326 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Именно так мы врываемся к вам, надеюсь вы скучали 😊 То, что я крайне безответственно писала сюда последнее время НЕ ОЗНАЧАЕТ, что я не собирала для вас материал. Так что доставайте свои двойные листочки, будем много записывать.

17❤‍🔥9😁3😈1

1 Jun 2026, 18:05 UTC519 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Представляю вашему вниманию — максимально импульсивно купленные прошлым летом на WB капли-концентрат автозагар для лица. Что же тут удивительного? — спросите вы Эти скромные капельки стоимостью меньше 1000₽ так лихо напихали за воротник люксовому аналогу от Clarins, что даже смешно, — отвечу вам я. — Оттенок очень натуральный. Без рыжины и желтизны. — Смывается постепенно и ровно, не пятнами. — Наносится элементар

16💅6🔥5

1 Jun 2026, 17:54 UTC380 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я решила возвращаться в ✨прайм✨ Как будто бы в нем была… И поскольку загар я люблю всей душой, последние две недели активно торговалась сама с собой между автозагаром и настоящим. Пока победил настоящий. Прошу не осуждать. Но стареть я тоже не планирую, поэтому лицо защищаю тщательно. • Первое — SPF. Сейчас на тесте стик Tocobo. • Второе — ща будет моя неожиданная рекомендация.

😁9❤‍🔥54

19 May 2026, 17:10 UTC473 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Примерно так я пытаюсь отдыхать и «уменьшать стресс»

😁123🔥3

18 May 2026, 19:36 UTC458 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В последнее время словила гиперфикс на ароматы чистоты. Вот этот запах свежевыстиранного постельного белья, холодной ткани и «только из душа». Потому что к вечеру я бываю настолько перегруженная, что любые вишни, карамели и «султаны де сабы» на теле начинают бесить. Особенно поймут все, у кого «четверг это 16:00» и «вода из кружки невкусная» — поймут. В парфюм в ход пошел почти нетронутый Byredo Blanche. Гель для

💯84🔥2

14 May 2026, 18:17 UTC473 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А вообще я поняла, что мы тут коллективно так здорово НЕ экономим мои деньги)) Все, что вы пишете, я добросовестно скупаю, чтобы потом вам об этом рассказать. Самым дорогим вышел пост про духи😅 Кто посоветовал Dolce Amalfi, я вас запомнила…

😁15💯3🔥21❤‍🔥1

14 May 2026, 18:02 UTC438 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Девочки, все сюдааа! Валяя… Этот объем продержался на ветру весь вечер. И продержался бы дольше, если бы я хоть чем-то закрепила. На моих волос мне не удавалось создать объем ничем и никогда. На выпускном меня накрутили, через час как ни в чем не бывало. Короче, вам нужен туториал?

20🥰7🍓4🔥4❤‍🔥2💅2

8 May 2026, 07:33 UTC557 views23 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

Это вот я хотела вам рекомендовать новый контуринг от Vivienne Sabo. Очень удачный оттенок taupe и сама формула легко тушуется, а потом фиксируется. Но он просто перестал выдавливаться. Я уже его весь расковыряла, и ничего. Но знаете, что любопытно? С тестером в магазине было то же самое! Но нет же, я же разыграла стандартный набор идиота: «Ну это он тут плохой, а со мной все будет хорошо» «Может проблема во мне…

10😁85

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @jar_of_lie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,101,107 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Баночка Лжи” (@jar_of_lie), 876 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jar_of_lie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.