Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for xyz_push

Channel

xyz_push

@xyz_push

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6subscribers

-10,321 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003283281606
TypeChannel
Username@xyz_push
Created24 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/xyz_push

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 4 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

610,4465,2268 August 2026 — 10,327 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,334 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,345 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,361 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,375 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,446 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,349 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,234 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,186 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,155 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,122 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,096 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,042 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,985 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6 subscribers8 August 20264 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 57 days, net -10,321. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Oct 2026, 08:556-9,979
24 Aug 2026, 19:189,985-57
23 Aug 2026, 02:1610,042-54
21 Aug 2026, 15:0810,096-26
20 Aug 2026, 13:1410,122-33
19 Aug 2026, 10:3510,155-31
18 Aug 2026, 13:4310,186-48
17 Aug 2026, 11:3310,234-115
16 Aug 2026, 02:3810,349-97
14 Aug 2026, 13:3410,446+71
13 Aug 2026, 01:4310,375+14
12 Aug 2026, 03:2310,361+16
9 Aug 2026, 23:3110,345+11
9 Aug 2026, 01:4110,334+7
8 Aug 2026, 15:3110,327first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 24 December 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 38 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 05s
Average length
1m 09s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

547 reactions across 28 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡13725.0%
👍11521.0%
💩6912.6%
👎376.76%
❤336.03%
🤔315.67%
🤮305.48%
😁274.94%
😱224.02%
🌚81.46%
💯71.28%
🤯71.28%
👏50.914%
🤣40.731%
👀30.548%
🔥30.548%
😡30.548%
🤨20.366%
❤‍🔥10.183%
🖕10.183%
2 further kinds20.366%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 547 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2025 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC905 views45 reactionsread 15 August 2026

咳咳,那个啥,我简单讲两句哈。 我们要科学的探索,有条不紊的向前。 某些同志呢要再接再厉,不要把自己的因素推到别人

🤡22🤔8💩6❤4🤮3😁2

15 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC952 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026

好像活了,你们试试看,公费

❤8💩6

14 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC≈2,570 views95 reactionsread 15 August 2026

妈的别啥都推到我头上,老子开服这么久了,不可能一直没人抓我包,特别是 非直连服 别碰瓷我 ,我想偷 用户都骂娘了,一卡一卡,还要挂梯子 我说一句话,非直连的 全是垃圾,不服d我服

👍40💩32🤮7🌚4👎4😡3💯2🤔2

14 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC≈2,580 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

因祸得福😀我都没注意 123直链 有账号信息id,幸好没人举报我 咳咳 我也不可能举报别人 我要看看怎么隐藏

🤡20🤔6💩5👏3❤1🤮1

14 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC≈2,680 views55 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

卧槽,怎么传我跑了,我还没有跑呢

🤡34👍7😁7💩3🤮2🔥1🖕1

14 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC≈3,410 views86 reactionsread 15 August 2026

我打算妙传全网全服资源 更低的钱更好的体验 不知道秒传是啥可以问一下ai,不走服务器流量 等哪个喝多了,学某人,直接分享出来,百万大包 再改一下 墨云阁就算了 什么垃圾服 比我贵,资源混杂115 ,我不是喷115,而是一个垃圾大盘鸡,用115单账号开服。 具体说明看这 https://t.me/xyz_push/698

🤡49🤔14🤮6👍5🤣4💩2💯2🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC≈3,310 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026

我还要请问一下,走我的域名,302到盘,怎么可能出现你的域名。这个技术我还真不知道。而且我的推流域名 不是gf.emby.yun,天天有人抓包,早就爆来了

😁7🤨2🤮1

14 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈3,100 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

不对,这个我要咋解释,用你的然后跳转到我这里,你说302,怎么可能拿的到记录,跨域都不可能

🤡1

14 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC≈3,130 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

6,时间,排序,大小都不一样,细品啥,我承认用秒传拉搬运到我的账号,但走的还是我的服务器,完全不废你的流量

🤡3❤1

14 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC≈3,010 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

等我一次性 改完bug就推送版本

👏2🤮1

13 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC≈3,190 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026

应该没人了,例行维护,推送新版本

❤7😁3🤮1

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @xyz_push. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“xyz_push” (@xyz_push), 6 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xyz_push.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.