📣茶百道emby开注预告 8.15 22:00开注810名额 早上嘎了的可以蹲一蹲,❤️ 信息来源:https://t.me/Chapanda1/21199 #记者快讯
❤1🤷♀1

Channel
@guyushijie666
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10,469subscribers
+575 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003752482576 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @guyushijie666 |
| Description | 谷雨影讯:谷雨时节,细雨如丝 📣这是专注于Emby 生态资讯的传播阵地。 •我们不生产资源,我们只做优质流媒体时光的“导航员”。 • 一手动态:全网 Emby 资讯实时播报,力争带来第一手资讯服务ℹ️。(包括但不限于emby开注、服务迁移、保号调整) •福利回馈:通过联名系列抽奖活动等方式,给各位带来丰富奖品,感谢各位对本频道的大力支持。 本频道已开设评论区,欢迎大家畅所欲言,不要骂架就好。 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/guyushijie666 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 10,469 | +26 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 10,443 | +32 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 10,411 | +43 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 10,368 | +391 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 9,977 | +83 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 9,894 | first reading |
58 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 52 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 58 (31 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 117,151 |
| Reactions total | 123 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
123 reactions across 30 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 42.3% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 18.7% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 14.6% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 8.94% | |
| 💊 | 9 | 7.32% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 2.44% | |
| 🤷♂ | 3 | 2.44% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 1.63% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.813% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 0.813% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📣茶百道emby开注预告 8.15 22:00开注810名额 早上嘎了的可以蹲一蹲,❤️ 信息来源:https://t.me/Chapanda1/21199 #记者快讯
❤1🤷♀1
kiti emby 慢讯,kiti迁移到新面板了。需要到新bot确认一下迁移是否正确✅ 新机器人🤖:https://t.me/kitiyh_bot 新面板:https://mb.8888654.xyz/ Bot 显示未绑定怎么办??? 先使用 Emby 用户名和密码登录新面板。在新 Bot 私聊发送 /bind。Bot 会生成一个 6 位绑定码,有效期为 5 分钟,只能使用一次。进入面板“个人中心”里的“账号绑定”。输入绑定码并点击“确认绑定”。 如遇到无法登录、账号未找到、积分或到期时间不正确,请把 Emby 用户名和问题截图发给管理员核对。 请勿把 Emby 用户名或密码发送给 Bot,Bot 不会要求或处理账号密码。 信息来源:https://t.me/kitiemby/27606 #记者慢讯
哦豁完蛋。😱 真不看👀啊,一长串封禁幸运儿 信息来源:https://t.me/Chapanda1/20877 #记者快讯
茶百道emby ⏰ 8.14 22:00开注100位幸运观众 ⚠️ 保号规则:30天内观看 信息来源:https://t.me/Chapanda1/19945 #记者快讯
❤3
茶百道emby 现已恢复,请各位务必今日内回传,回传成功🏆与否以bot显示为准! 不建议早起挑战回传!检测时间不一定是8点⚡️ 信息来源:https://t.me/Chapanda1/19827 #记者快讯
纳尼😲注册爆ip 这这这,各位注册的时候还得要万分谨慎啊,别顾着抢号,忘记开梯子,不小心👀给自己开盒了呀🥜 希望腐竹赶紧处理一下,这也太bug了叭😅 信息来源:https://t.me/ding_fenghaha/6 #记者快讯
🤔3
谷雨影讯社 pinned a photo
🎰 周末小抽 📮 抽奖条件: 🎫 加入-非越媒体库 Chat 🎫 加入-谷雨影讯社 🎫 加入-碎片谷雨小窝 🎁 奖品内容: Geetv 公费月卡 × 10 💡 活动说明: 大力感谢树哥的支持 中奖之后带截图1个小时之内联系 https://t.me/Playfragments?direct 📅 开奖日期:(UTC+8) 2026年08月15日 19时00分00秒
❤1
谷雨影讯社 pinned a photo
🎰 夏天emby,周末小抽! 📮 抽奖条件: 🎫 加入-夏天 🎫 加入-EplayerX官方交流群 🎫 加入-碎片谷雨小窝 🎫 加入-谷雨影讯社 🎁 奖品内容: EplayerX播放器58元版 × 2 夏天emby月卡 × 25 夏天emby周卡 × 75 💡 活动说明: 🔥夏天emby硬盘服 + 🔥买EplayerX播放器送emby服 + 🔥高质量弹幕api,进群夏天拿即可! + 🔥不限量求片 夏天emby生态,尽量让您体验更佳🌈 播放器起播超快+硬盘服响应超快+秒出弹幕(😘精调柔光炫彩弹幕,好看不刺眼)!形成闭环,极佳体验! 备注:防脚本-发奖后,卡密有效期2小时,卡密只能用于新开号! 📅 开奖日期:(UTC+8) 2026年08月16日 21时21分21秒
吃瓜🍉之余 请各位认识到自己的账户和密码的重要性,不要随意将账户密码给予他人! 特别是每个emby服都一样的账户和密码的小伙子!😮💨 切记切记切记🥜小心今日的他人,就是明日的自己。😭😭😭 #记者快讯
❤2
泡面🍜emby 疑似借🐔生🥚,开服用的居然全都是帝服的资源。 原文:⬇️ 泡麵就是拿我資源開的服,流量跑我的,網盤跑我的,東西都跑我的,氣死了 信息来源:https://t.me/diacg_emby_channel/156 #记者快讯
😁15❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @guyushijie666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 951,602 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@guyushijie666 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“谷雨影讯社” (@guyushijie666), 10,469 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guyushijie666.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.