西瓜皮担保 - 免责声明 西瓜皮担保平台不参与也不掌握客户的具体业务操作细节。作为第三方担保服务方,我们的职责仅限于在交易过程中,确保交易双方按约定完成资金与货物(或服务)的正常交付。 对于交易双方所涉及的资金来源、货物来源及其最终用途,西瓜皮担保无法进行审查或验证,也不对其合法性及真实性提供任何形式的担保或承诺。 请交易双方在交易前务必自行确认并充分沟通所有交易细节,包括但不限于资金合法性、货物来源、交付方式及相关风险。 如因资金或货物来源存在问题,或因交易后用于任何违法违规行为所引发的一切责任与后果,均由交易双方自行承担,西瓜皮担保不承担任何连带责任。 客户应严格遵守所在国家及地区的相关法律法规,因个人行为导致的任何法律纠纷或后果,均与西瓜皮担保无关。 西瓜皮担保 - 郑重声明 西瓜皮担保始终秉持“诚信、安全、合规、透明”的原则开展业务,坚持底线运营,规范服务流程。 对于涉及违禁物品、人口买卖、毒品、军火及其…

Channel
西瓜皮官方公告
@xgpsq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,080subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002189874519 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xgpsq |
| Created | 20 June 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xgpsq |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 1,080 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 1,084 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 1,084 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 20 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.02%
- avg views ÷ 1,080 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 11.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (20 June 2024 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 11 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
✅担保不应该是一场关于效率的妥协。安全与速度,从来不是二选一! 西瓜皮担保提供安全交易环境,提供标准化资金的担保与交付保障,以高效率,人性化为服务特征,面向全网对交易安全性问题的人群提供保障服务 1、为什么选择西瓜皮担保? 西瓜皮担保的背后,集团公司为线下实体贵宾厅机构,集合了多家龙头担保集团的大量资源,长期承担高净值交易。因业务体量持续扩张,现拆分设立西瓜皮担保,作为独立品牌承接精细化担保服务。 2、专业配置 成员:西瓜皮担保团队由集团公司核心专业成员带队,均具备上万群以上的实操经验,一切流程化、标准化、简洁化。 系统:我们集成了最新高端技术+全新构架机器人、覆盖验群,拉群,转账核验等关键环节,带来不一样的体验 3、我们升级了什么? 在西瓜皮担保中,技术不再是辅助,而是信任的底层语言,在我们的最新研发的机器人当中加入了AI决策引擎,进行深度融合,我们将重新定义第一担保服务的标准 基于集团上万宗交易沉淀的数据,…
1
1
1
1
1
👏 欢迎来到 皮担保中心 我们是 Telegram 首个由头部基础设施发起的“监管与信用交易平台”,由 @kanxia 等顶级流量做信用背书。 我们的愿景:打造 Telegram 第一交易平台! 让每一次交易都做到“可监管、可追责、纯透明、绝对公平公正”。 🏆 核心三大信用保障: 1️⃣ 保证金链上公示(资金绝对安全) 商户均已缴纳足额保证金。账户地址永久置顶,资产流向全网公开,随时接受区块链审计,杜绝暗箱操作。 2️⃣ 纠纷公开仲裁(判罚绝对公正) 特设独立仲裁庭。每起纠纷全证据链公示(含流水、截图),接受全体用户检阅。判罚不公,平台全额纠正! 3️⃣ 商户生态透明(进出绝对合规) 优质新商户明确标识,离场商户足额退押并全额公示。维护信用闭环,确保每一位合作者体面进出。 ⚖️ 在这里,公平不是口号,而是制度。 加入 @pidanbao 皮担保,畅享全网最安全、最公正的顶级担保交易! ━━━ @pidanbao…
✅西瓜皮 · 担保平台免责声明 西瓜皮 · 担保平台不参与也不了解客户的具体业务操作。作为第三方担保平台,我们的职责仅限于确保交易的一方收到货物,另一方收到款项。对于交易双方的资金或货物的来源及其用途,汇海无法进行查证。 请交易双方在交易前自行确认并沟通好所有相关细节,包括但不限于资金和货物的合法性及来源。如果资金或货物的来源有问题,或者使用所购买的货物从事任何违法行为,本平台概不承担任何连带责任。 客户应自行遵守所在国家和地区的法律法规。如因客户行为违反相关法律法规,所引发的一切责任和后果均由客户自行承担,西瓜皮不承担任何责任。 西瓜皮 · 担保平台郑重声明 西瓜皮 · 担保交易平台始终秉持正道,以高标准、严要求为核心原则,坚守底线,正派经营。对于涉及人口买卖、毒品、军火等非法业务,我们坚决拒绝,请勿触碰底线!凡涉及此类业务者,皆为拉假群的骗子,务必警惕,切勿上当! 😀 西瓜皮 · 担保交易
1
👋交易首选 - 西瓜皮担保 ━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔹 公群导航: @xgpgq 🔹 盘口资源: @xgpyw 🔹 骗子曝光: @xgpbg 🔹 官方公告: @xgpsq 🔹 核心大群: @xgpjlq ━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧑🏻💻 公群-上押: @abou 🧑🏻💻 专群-客服: @achai 🧑🏻💻 供需-客服: @ashua 🧑🏻💻 仲裁-客服: @canjie 🧑🏻💻 投诉-建议: @geren ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖客服中心: @db365bot
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @xgpsq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 966,939 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@xgpsq named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“西瓜皮官方公告” (@xgpsq), 1,080 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xgpsq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.