Channel
@xgpbg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,824subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001844388041 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xgpbg |
| Description | 👋交易首选 - 西瓜皮担保 ━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔹 公群导航： @xgpgq 🔹 盘口资源： @xgpyw 🔹 骗子曝光： @xgpbg 🔹 官方公告： @xgpsq 🔹 核心大群： @xgpjlq ━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧑🏻💻 公群-上押： @abou 🧑🏻💻 专群-客服： @achai 🧑🏻💻 供需-客服： @ashua 🧑🏻💻 仲裁-客服： @canjie 🧑🏻💻 投诉-建议： @geren ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖客服中心： @db365bot |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xgpbg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 9,824 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 9,837 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 9,838 | first reading |
53 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 53 (7 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 103,400 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#网友曝光 此人真名：丁勇，电诈红通人员，开设资金盘，长期在泰国呆，各位姐妹上他的班，记得看好自己的包包，他会翻包看护照拍照，也会假装付u.网页其实是资金盘，余额根本没到账。奸诈狡猾。四处骗钱 装大哥。嫖娼不给钱。还会打女人。跑小费。看到此人小心。多名姐妹站出来哭诉，这男的房间有苹果ipa摄像头立床头，拍女孩子睡觉，我亲眼看见。 会上前抢女孩子护照企图撕掉，之前差点把女的掐死 🔥投稿爆料联系：@ashua 🛡️ 金融级安全交易 · 创新 web3 担保生态
#网友曝光 重庆的孟加拉支付 ，现在趁孟加拉支付比较乱，开始搞事情，合作的注意，今天不吃钱明天也会吃的。听说一直吃钱只不过没人曝光 🔥投稿爆料联系：@ashua 🛡️ 金融级安全交易 · 创新 web3 担保生态
#网友投稿 各位兄弟大家注意这个御龙湾DCPay大成国际支付，这个通道出现事情直接甩锅。 事情是这样的，我是经过朋友介绍和他们通道合作，然后第一笔客户汇款属于很顺利，后面因为时间的问题，太晚了，就没有让客户再进行电汇，我并告知他们通道查看卡是否异常，他们一直回答我正常可以进。 我让客户进行二次，结果客户把钱汇入，我刚好发单出去中间间隔分钟，他们告知我卡拉停，这样的情况不感觉到很巧吗？ 我没有发单子去之前从未跟我说过卡拉，并且我给他们说的是保单，他们给我说的是进算，后面出现事情，老板直接选择逃避信息不回，一直让下面的业务员进行解释，解释的是什么就是拖时间，按照责任划分这件事情从本身而言我公司一点责任也没有，作为你们通道方不管客户钱什么时候进，看见第一件事情就是拖出。 你们作为通道卡提供方没有理由去更换单子的卡，明明是精聊单卡而已，是老板户私自换卡不提醒双方导致客户死，这个责任在之后。 我公司这边说过这是一个什么样的客户…
#网友投稿 老天，这种傻逼骗子，在✈️说呢好好的、钱转好了，叫他转KBZ直接就给我全部拉黑删除。 有认识的嘛？好像就说我们腊戌呢，认识他家更好呢。 做代理的朋友们注意！！这个女生谁认识这个女生 做他的代理 还骗钱一个小女生家家 还搞这种 以后谁还敢做代理没有钱做代理 还搞这样 可怕 🔥投稿爆料联系：@ashua 🛡️ 金融级安全交易 · 创新 web3 担保生态#网友投稿
#网友曝光 #骗子 对方生成可以卖假钞，500块钱33张可以发快递，本人通过支付宝付款后不发货，随后对方拉黑 🔥投稿爆料联系：@ashua 🛡️ 金融级安全交易 · 创新 web3 担保生态
#网友曝光 #缅甸 #渣男 #兔子 一个渣男，外号兔子，飞机网名T，私人号DT，福建人，28岁。 这家伙所在公司老板、主管还有一堆管理全是福建闽南人，公司叫HT，窝在御龙湾别墅区37栋办公，里面一百多个中国人。 公司专干国内电商诈骗和杀猪盘，骗了无数中国人血汗钱，简直他妈的令人发指。员工每天被迫干16个小时以上，还经常被殴打体罚，妥妥臭名昭著的黑公司。希望御龙湾物业赶紧严查这个公司和负责人。 兔子本人长期玩弄女生感情，到处勾搭缅华妹子。照片和飞机号一爆出来，估计认识他的人不少，很多人都被他聊过。 恋爱期间人家给他买了无数吃的和礼物，这货却只会吹牛画饼，骗感情，一点不懂珍惜和责任。就喜欢到处撩妹，还特爱占便宜。认识他的人务必小心点。 公司名字、项目信息和地址照片已经直接上传中国反诈中心，相关领导好好看着办吧。 🔥投稿爆料联系：@ashua 🛡️ 金融级安全交易 · 创新 web3 担保生态
#网友曝光 #邓翔 我一直都很信任你，所以当时根本没有多想，就把10000U转给你操作。钱没赚到就算了，后来你把人家这1万U本金拿去用在自己的事情上， 我也没有怪你，因为我信任你，也相信你会把钱还回来。 你当时说过几天还4.5万元人民币，还说多给人家5000元。我跟你说不用多给，把人家的本金还上就行。结果人家这一等就是快20天，这20天里天天催我，催得我像被追命一样，整个人都被搞得身心俱疲。 钱是你用了，最后坏人却一直是我在当。到了约定时间，你只给了3万元人民币，剩下1.5万元你说五天后再给。那个时候我依然还在替你考虑，我说行，那就再等五天。 可现在已经过去五个“五天”了，你连这件事提都不提。给你打电话不接，发消息也不回。直到我把你曝光，你才给我发消息，结果不但没有好好处理，还反过来怪我曝光你，说既然曝光了，那就不还我钱了。 我一直把你当兄弟，你却把我当表弟。你怕别人知道以后自己没面子，难道我就不要面子吗。你的面子是…
#网友爆料 #严庆滨 此人叫 严庆滨 夜场灯光改行贩卖人口：如果你的身边最近有人出国或者你有出国打工的想法请你花几分钟看完以下这段事情经过！并分享出去，愿在外打拼每一个中国人都能平安。 真的会有人花大量时间精力认识你，接触你，讨好你…其实就是为你卖你！把你置于死地！是的，这个世界上真的有这个坏种，反人类的cs！它就是 看上去人摸狗样的是吧？可它却做了全中国人最残忍的事情，电炸，绑架，杀人，人口贩卖。 事情经过来了，本人与它认识于2024年佤邦猛波。早期此畜生并没用漏出任何不正常现象，并表现出一副人畜无害的模样，除了平时爱去赌场赌钱，跟爱向身边的人借钱并未发现其它正常现象！ 严庆滨为了让这个比它大很多的女人爽，那段时间也是使出浑身解数，并在网上购买了大量治理肾阴虚的药品进行治疗身体，后面在它房间发现大量使用过药物空瓶子。PS：有点跑题了，放一张它的上岸情感照吧 这个时候它的恶性要开始了。时间过得很快，来到2025年下半…
#网友曝光 #菲律宾 #jk #骗子 此人言而无信 借钱不还一直说没钱 现在我都没钱了让他换钱就说没有 说话还牛逼哄哄的 在菲律没见过这么不要脸的人到处骗钱 看人家说的话 要弄死我 我先发个声明我出事了 就是这个逼弄的 我也跟国内的朋友通知一下 这个人威胁到我了毕竟人家东北的 在菲律宾认识那些绑匪怕怕的 我死了 你跟你的老婆也跑不掉我说的 稍后我会把你的对话发给国内的 欠钱不还牛逼哄哄的说这话还威胁你 你算个鸡毛啊 死骗子一个 🔥投稿爆料联系：@ashua 🛡️ 金融级安全交易 · 创新 web3 担保生态
#网友曝光 #骗子 我在他的频道的里面的网站被骗了600，一开始我充200后面提现不出来去他说再下两单因为系统识别不出来要3单才可以就好了，我再去下后面他就说要连着3单，我就觉得不对就问他不能直接给我令吗他说能的话自己都用了他没有，后面就叫他退款他也同意了说7天系统清财打款支仔宝结果到现在都没有，我就才反应过来被骗了 🔥投稿爆料联系：@ashua 🛡️ 金融级安全交易 · 创新 web3 担保生态
#网友投稿 这个人南翁人，找我打字花，仗着自己和我是同个寨子人，然后我帮他垫付着，结果他信息不回。 口口声声说这只是一点小钱，那你倒是还钱啊。东南亚这种蛀虫真的数不清了，四千块，够那些老缅挣一年了。 🔥投稿爆料联系：@ashua 🛡️ 金融级安全交易 · 创新 web3 担保生态
#网友曝光 #阿峰 啊峰 福建龙岩连城人 大年三十没钱要去玩包厢 叫我先买单初六就给 包厢买单差不多一万U，一直拖，一个月推一个月，后面我看这么拖不想给，我就说给一半，包厢我也去了我认一半，主要钱还是下面员工的工资 拖到现在还是天天借口一大堆，一下那边公司不结账，一下对接老板被抓了，发地址都发了多少次了，把我当猴耍啊，现在人在缅甸佤邦，我相信很多人都认识这个人吧，让大家看看这副嘴脸，这次只是曝光聊天记录，下次就是带上你身份信息了。 🔥投稿爆料联系：@ashua 🛡️ 金融级安全交易 · 创新 web3 担保生态
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @xgpbg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 751,394 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“西瓜皮骗子曝光” (@xgpbg), 9,824 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xgpbg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.