Channel
@huihai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
642subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003904722402 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @huihai @huihaijt |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 21 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/huihai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 642 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 642 | -18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 660 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 660 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (21 April 2026 – 18 July 2026) |
| Views total | 17,500 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
58 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 39.7% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 39.7% | |
| 🤔 | 12 | 20.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @huihai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2026 to 18 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😃😃😃😃😃 🤙导航 @huihai 😀 负责人 @qiaosi ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 汇海集团矩阵联盟： 〰：皮担保 〰：福运通 〰：大事件 〰：通缉令 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 汇海集团致力于业务拓展，综合型集团，自成闭环模式，从一站式业务变成多站式服务，服务于各行各业，人人致富，才是汇海集团的初衷，项目人员无忧，业务首选汇海，安全赚米，首选汇海。
👍5
📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱 😃😃😃😃 😃😃😃😃😃 😁 皮炎子“淘气包” @pyztqb 🤖 双向投稿 @mbxsbot 😘 缅北悬赏通缉令（吃瓜）@zhuabu 😘 皮炎子爱吃瓜 🍉 @pyzgx 😘 皮炎子《司机不迷路》 @jgclub ⚡️⚡️ 缅北交流群（禁硬广告）❤️ @zhuafu
🤔12❤11👍11
😌😎😘😇😃😃😃😃 西瓜皮新闻官方客服 🤖专人投稿 @zhuanren 🍉西瓜皮 @geren 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 📱📱📱😀😀 西瓜皮新闻官方频道 😘 东南亚大事件 https://t.me/+bSG_NNJH-_83MTRl 😘 菲律宾大事件 https://t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😘 柬埔寨大事件 https://t.me/+XSr9aD0e6wAzNTQ1 😘 东南亚骗子网 https://t.me/+A68rz1knNW8xM2M9 😘 东南亚小视频 https://t.me/+NimKL5ZyR043OGFl 😘 泰国大事件 https://t.me/+n8_nQ15HT3cyMjFl 😘 缅甸大事件 https://t.me/+OzjaWvC8al4zMGQ1 😘 迪拜大事件 https://t.me/+YOOPhC1O5rtlNjBl 😘 东南亚求职 https://t.me/+f2uuGxXEqB…
❤7
📱📱📱📱📱📱📱 《福运通钱庄》—— 外币承兑 😘 钱庄官方频道 @waibi 😘 私享会 · Fyt Tvb @fyttvb 🥇 官方客服 @duzai 🥇 双向联系 @fytqzbot 😌😌😃😌 😀🤣😀
❤5
👊👊👊👊👊👊👊 西瓜皮担保官方频道 😘 公群频道 @xgpgq 😘 供需频道 @xgpyw 😘 官方公告 @xgpsq 😘 资源大群 @xgpjlq 😘 骗子曝光 @xgpbg 👊👊👊👊👊👊👊 😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘 西瓜皮担保各部门负责人 🤖客服中心 @db365bot ❤️ 公群负责人 @abou ❤️ 专群负责人 @achai ❤️ 广告负责人 @ashua ❤️ 仲裁负责人 @canjie 😘😘🥰😘😘😘😘😘
👍7
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @huihai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@huihai named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“汇海集团（@huihai）” (@huihai), 642 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/huihai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.