Channel
@xcw7899
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004468452028 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xcw7899 |
| Created | 7 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 18 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xcw7899 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:23 | 1 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:47 | 1 | first reading |
2 posts held, back to 7 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2 (7 September 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 261 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Sept 2026, 14:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
😀😀😀最大的新闻爆料联盟 @daka 🔥表情包百万用户遍布全网 🔥一千个引流频道随处可见 🧐全网最新最快最全东南亚资讯，寻人|互助|曝光|悬赏|反诈|揭秘|，专注于重大新闻和突发事件发布，揭秘各大园区黑暗内幕，扶手、狗推、盘总聚集地。 ⚡️阳光新闻 @yangguang 三年老牌知名东南亚媒体 ⚡️柬中时报 @cctimes 柬埔寨最具影响力和公信力的华人新闻媒体。 ⚡️华人大事件 @dashijian 巨资打造 ✔️正版大事件品牌，其他大事件均为假冒！ ⚡️博牛新闻 @boniu 服务东南亚华人11年，与博度齐名，东南亚最知名的新闻媒体。 ⚡️人民日报 @renmin 东南亚实时新闻全天更新，不错过每一个大瓜！ 🏅流量来源介绍 🏅表情包&emoji 🏅电报百科导航 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 😀😀😀😀😀100%包出款 已在阳光上押100万U👍点击立即游戏😲
Channel created
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @xcw7899. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“阳光新闻 @yangguang” (@xcw7899), 1 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xcw7899.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.