Channel
@xcbcjbg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
16,049subscribers
+141 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002542125326 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xcbcjbg |
| Description | 老师榜： @SZXCBANG 交流大群： @SZXCBjlq 上榜/赞助/解禁： @xuntaqbd_bot |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xcbcjbg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 16,049 | +31 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 16,018 | +10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:09 | 16,008 | +9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 15,999 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 16,000 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 16,004 | +11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 15,993 | +36 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 15,957 | +49 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 15,908 | first reading |
69 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 69 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 69 (4 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 30,576 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
11 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 90.9% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 69 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【时间】：2026-08-15 【老师】：鑫冉 【留名】：好想中奖（恩师馆长） 【人照】：8 【颜值】：8 【身材】：8.5 【服务】：9.5 【课费】：600 【环境】：9 【综合】：8.6 【过程】：许久未曾出击 看到有老师的券 立马兑换 约好课来到楼下在老师的遥控下来到教室 老师是个小少妇 人照差别不大 老师给我拿了red哞 然后脱衣老师陪浴 我抱着老师开始舌吻 老师的舌头很滑 洗完后蹲下来含住我的鸡儿开始水中萧 太舒服了吧 让老师深喉老师立马含得更深了 每一下都顶在了老师喉咙深处 接着来到床上 搂着老师 老师开始舔奶头 然后舔蛋 吃鸡吧 我感觉来了 让老师带上套开始传教士 老师下面很滑很湿很热 我轻轻一蹭 整根就插入了 老师被我这一下搞得猝不及防 放声淫叫起来 然后一边舌吻一边吃奶一边抽插 老师乳头很敏感 吃老师奶的时候老师忍不住颤抖起来 最后换成后入式加速出货了 …
【时间】：2026-08-15 【老师】：丹丹 【留名】：野谷生春 【人照】：9 【颜值】：8 【身材】：9 【服务】：8 【课费】：600 【环境】：9 【综合】：8.6 【过程】：早就想约这个长腿老师了，见面后人照无差，化妆较浓所以拍照就更好看一点，人苗条纤细，长腿滑嫩。坐下续烟，聊天氛围还可以也聊得来的，脱衣后老师两颗奶子展露出来是内嵌小嫩胸有b有余很挺水滴形。全是无纹身和花刀，皮肤比较细腻光滑。浴室先漱了口老师用牙膏刷牙很仔细。 出来后又聊了好一会天开始正事，舌吻是大蟒蛇舌头伸出360度的搅，服务比较少舔胸和口交，无69不能摸下面。身材是真的好腿细光滑，胸捏上去软糯光嫩。脚丫也很嫩涂了黑曜的猫眼颜色，做的时候忍不住吃脚，传教和后入，侧入，女上完事手工。 【优点】：胸嫩软糯，长腿光滑，嫩脚丫 【缺点】：服务比较少，手机回消息多
【时间】：2026-08-15 【老师】：新新 【留名】：好想中奖（恩师馆长） 【人照】：8 【颜值】：8.5 【身材】：7 【服务】：7 【课费】：工兵 【环境】：6 【综合】：7.3 【过程】：老师还是很谨慎，应该是在猫眼看到了人再开门的，我cj不喜欢站在正门口。个子小小的，皮肤不怎么样，颜值是嫩妹那一种，但是有一种疲惫感。没有刚刚下海的青涩感，帮洗澡，口只口龟头，不深喉，做爱有点不配和合颜值还可以。 【优点】：颜值还行 【缺点】：没服务
【时间】：2026-08-14 【老师】：苏苏 【留名】：无尘 【人照】：9 【颜值】：9 【身材】：9 【服务】：9 【课费】：600p 【环境】：9 【综合】：9 【过程】：进入教室，老师很热情的递水，帮忙放包。老师奶子好大，坐下聊天时忍不住把老师抱过来，把奶子从衣服里面掏出来，狠狠地放到嘴里吃起来。一会后，知道缴费，洗澡，老师在洗澡时又是一顿服务，大奶子在我全身蹭过，然后蹲下来含住鸡吧开吃。 到床上，老师开始服务，课表上面的服务都有，而且服务的很认真。戴套啪啪，跟老师来了个勾引邻居的剧情，啪的很有意思。 【优点】：奶子大 服务好 【缺点】：无
【时间】：2026-08-14 【老师】：小丫头 【留名】：西门大官人 【人照】：9 【颜值】：9 【身材】：9 【服务】：9 【课费】：600 【环境】：9 【综合】：9 【过程】：老师年纪看起来不大，进门会提供饮料和拖鞋，聊天也很自然。老师有点肉，但是不胖，那种肉一点的摸起来手感很不错。缴费，洗澡，老师会帮忙把全身洗干净，然后擦干上床。老师要先给我服务，我没让，让老师先躺下，我给老师服务。先吃奶子，奶子挺嫩的，不大但是挺。然后舔小穴，下面干净，没有异味，舔了一会就流水了，然后把鸡吧塞到老师嘴里让老师吃鸡吧。最后戴套啪啪，先女上，换后入，最后传教出货。休息一会，洗澡穿衣结束出击。 【优点】：听话 有点萌萌的 【缺点】：无舌吻
❤2
【时间】：2026-08-13 【老师】：司藤 【留名】：满船清梦压星河（阳痿版） 【人照】：9 【颜值】：8.9 【身材】：8.8 【服务】：9 【课费】：500 【环境】：9 【综合】：8.94 【过程】：进门看是一小少妇，个头不高，长相可以，皮肤偏白，滑滑溜溜的。胸挺大的，很真实，女上一弹一弹的很有趣。上课认真，浅吻，口的很卖力，时间足，很舒服，服务态度很好，主动帮擦身子，会有指滑胸滑。整体比较满意的。屁股肥美，后入会收缩，松紧度较好。披肩发整体更美。 优缺点：皮肤白，长相可以 【优点】：皮肤白 【缺点】：无
【时间】：2026-08-12 【老师】：嘻嘻 【留名】：Robert2 【人照】：9 【颜值】：8.8 【身材】：9.5 【服务】：9.5 【课费】：600P 【环境】：8.8 【综合】：9.12 【过程】：提前一天跟老师约好时间，准时前往出击。 进入房间，老师穿着很清凉，仔细打量了一番，嘻嘻老师个子大概155，皮肤白皙，重点的是奶子大，估计至少有C以上，腰挺细的，这个身材真是爱了。 主动交了费用，双双脱掉衣服，签收去鸳鸯浴。趁机把老师上上下下全部摸了一个遍，老师也很配合我摸她。 上床，老师主动舌吻，舌头伸出来互相搅动。然后老师开始吃鸡吧，口活很好，各种舔吞。然后换我服务老师，吃奶子，舔小穴。老师下面刮干净了，人工白虎，舔起来没有味道，舔的老师流了好多水。 最后老师求我草她，于是戴套，先是传教，然后后入，换到女上，顺势抱起老师开始抱着草，最后传教出货。老师非常配合，态度很棒。 【优点】：服务很好，态度配合 【缺点】：无
【时间】：2026-08-12 【老师】：小丫头 【留名】：宫本武藏 【人照】：8.5 【颜值】：8 【身材】：8 【服务】：8.5 【课费】：工兵 【环境】：8 【综合】：8.2 【过程】：来到妹子地方，开门小小的，脸圆圆的，大概20多岁，脱衣后胸挺大很挺，有点微胖，进浴室帮洗的很干净，有水中萧。来到床上，课表上的都有，相比服务系老师差一点，但是毕竟嫩妹，69下面很干净类似白虎。做爱的时候很投入，骚话不断，后入的屁股视角效果也很好，最后后入出货。 【优点】：比嫩妹三件套服务多，胸大 【缺点】：相比服务系差一些
【时间】：2026-08-12 【老师】：葡萄糖 【留名】：（暂时上岸）桥本环奈3代⭕️🥚💓 【人照】：9 【颜值】：9 【身材】：8.5 【服务】：8.8 【课费】：700 【环境】：8.7 【综合】：8.8 【过程】：细节量化评定： 颜值评价😍：A（年龄27左右，属于御姐🧍♀️，脸比较精致） 身材评价🧍♀️：A-（身高165左右，胸围A，胸部的确偏小，乳头偏黑、臀部肥硕） 服务交流 🥰：A+（SPA类服务无毒龙，口交包裹感不错,交谈很顺畅） 做爱反馈🥳：A+（做爱投入度高，节奏把控舒服，尤其后入的时候） 工作环境🏠：A -（小区属于比较老的无电梯拆迁房，好在内部装饰还可以） 【优点】：做爱💖非常投入，节奏有快有慢，颜值很好看 【缺点】：胸🐻部较小，身上有轻微的豆豆和少许残留肥胖纹
【时间】：2026-08-12 【老师】：小丫头 【留名】：X -man 【人照】：9 【颜值】：9 【身材】：9 【服务】：9.5 【课费】：600p 【环境】：9 【综合】：9.1 【过程】：很久之前去过一次小丫头老师，当时老师刚下海，什么都不会，主打一个新鲜。 看到老师又开课了，立即约课出击。 老师人照一致，挺热情的。主动缴费，洗澡，上床。 老师现在服务增加了，课表上面的服务都有，当然肯定不能跟服务系老师比，不过有总比没有好。吃奶，舔逼，69互舔一顿炫。戴上套套开始啪啪，传教，女上，后入，老师各种姿势都很配合，叫声也很淫荡，还跟老师互相说了一些淫言秽语，感到一阵兴奋后出货。 【优点】：服务态度配合 听话 【缺点】：无蛇
【时间】：2026-08-12 【老师】：嘻嘻 【留名】：X hero 【人照】：9 【颜值】：9 【身材】：9 【服务】：9.5 【课费】：600 【环境】：9 【综合】：9.1 【过程】：看到老师降价了，只是开7，现在开6，所以跟老师约了出击。 老师个子小巧，身材很棒，胸大腰细屁股翘。人也非常热情，穿着情趣内衣，很是骚气。课表上面的服务都有，大蟒蛇管饱，69互舔也管饱。啪啪各种姿势都配合，水很多，都流到床单上了。 【优点】：服务好 态度好 【缺点】：无
【时间】：2026-08-11 【老师】：婉儿 【留名】：沉梦昂志5.0（已战损） 【人照】：8.8 【颜值】：8.5 【身材】：8.6 【服务】：9 【课费】：600P 【环境】：9 【综合】：8.78 【过程】：时隔一段时间，再次约到婉儿。 见面时已没有上次的生疏感，一切都自然得很。她还是那样热情开朗，主动又带着点俏皮。看着她明显瘦了些，整个人清爽了不少。 进门后她立刻热情地递水、递拖鞋、又端出零食，像是早就准备好了。闲聊了一会儿，气氛越来越放松，她便主动开始脱衣，拉着我一起进浴室陪浴。 温热的水流下，她从前胸洗到后背，再从上到下细细地清洗，动作认真又带着几分撩人。洗完后她没急着出来，直接在水中俯身，含住为我做了一次水中的口活，温热湿润，着实舒服得让人头皮发麻。 随后两人擦干身子上床。她先让我趴着，用掌心在背部慢慢按摩了一会儿，力道恰到好处，身心都渐渐松下来。接着换到正面，用胸部贴着我缓缓推揉，指尖偶尔轻划过敏感处，再低头含…
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @xcbcjbg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 593,976 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@xcbcjbg named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“苏州寻春报告” (@xcbcjbg), 16,049 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xcbcjbg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.