Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 车友会出击报告

Channel

车友会出击报告

@XMbmxc8888

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,941subscribers

+7,245 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002425414155
TypeChannel
Username@XMbmxc8888
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held44
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/XMbmxc8888

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@xcbcjbg/256524 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC@XMbmxc8888/214 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC0.9816 hours
@xcbcjbg/251517 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC@XMbmxc8888/204 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC0.9822 minutes
@xcbcjbg/256825 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC@XMbmxc8888/215 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC0.9816 hours
@xcbcjbg/24799 Aug 2026, 22:25 UTC@XMbmxc8888/195 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC0.988.1 hours
@xcbcjbg/257227 Aug 2026, 02:28 UTC@XMbmxc8888/216 · this entry27 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC0.972.3 hours
@xcbcjbg/248511 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC@XMbmxc8888/196 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC0.941.6 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@xcbcjbg6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.975.2 hours@xcbcjbg (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 73 comparable posts for this entry, running 21 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

5,69212,9419,316.57 August 2026 — 5,696 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,692 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,063 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,409 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,845 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,253 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,648 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,019 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,284 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,533 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,767 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,168 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,355 subscribers29 September 2026 — 11,112 subscribers5 October 2026 — 11,834 subscribers9 October 2026 — 12,330 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,461 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,526 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,525 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,570 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,613 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,688 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,736 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,805 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,823 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,769 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,759 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,761 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,718 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,664 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,656 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,654 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,672 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,705 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,758 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,796 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,820 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,821 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,872 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,897 subscribers8 November 2026 — 12,892 subscribers9 November 2026 — 12,869 subscribers11 November 2026 — 12,913 subscribers14 November 2026 — 12,941 subscribers7 August 202614 November 2026
44 measurements spanning 99 days, net +7,245. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,605–14,028 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 15:5712,941+28
11 Nov 2026, 14:5612,913+44
9 Nov 2026, 22:3412,869-23
8 Nov 2026, 17:1412,892-5
6 Nov 2026, 10:4812,897+25
5 Nov 2026, 12:5712,872+51
4 Nov 2026, 13:2012,821+1
3 Nov 2026, 14:3912,820+24
2 Nov 2026, 11:2912,796+38
1 Nov 2026, 08:0512,758+53
31 Oct 2026, 07:5612,705+33
30 Oct 2026, 04:3912,672+18
29 Oct 2026, 04:1812,654-2
28 Oct 2026, 04:1912,656-8
27 Oct 2026, 02:0812,664-54
26 Oct 2026, 01:4012,718-43
24 Oct 2026, 22:3012,761+2
24 Oct 2026, 00:3112,759-10
22 Oct 2026, 21:2912,769-54
21 Oct 2026, 21:4912,823first reading

Engagement

74 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.0%
avg views ÷ 12,941 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,710
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.478%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 74 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held74 (21 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total78,720
Reactions total362
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,106 reactions across 73 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,14837.0%
👍39012.6%
🔥32110.3%
🥰2247.21%
👏1886.05%
😁1173.77%
💋822.64%
🍌812.61%
🍾762.45%
💯622.00%
🤩391.26%
🎃371.19%
😈341.09%
🐳280.901%
⚡270.869%
🍓260.837%
🎉240.773%
💘220.708%
🤪210.676%
👀180.58%
23 further kinds1414.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (6.90%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,150 views14 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【公开榜】: @XMbmxc88 【时间】:2026-11-06 【老师】:#逸淑 @yi_shu_1024 【留名】:luluwei 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:8 【课费】:600 【环境】:8 【综合】:8.8 【过程】:听群友好评去的,果然没有失望,老师住高档小区 房间干净,帮洗很认真,交代老师放缓节奏 一点没矫情 从我背开始亲 舔到屁股,大腿,脚面,中间带过菊花。我以为毒龙就这样了呢,结果让我跪起来我才知道 才开始。这一番神舔 菊花要爽飞了哈哈 翻过来正面的时候 还把我两条腿抬起来 她趴在下面双手托着我屁股 又来了一遍毒龙 真的是太顶了 从来没有老师毒的这么认真彻底 口二弟就不用说了 个人觉得对逸淑来说 就是手到擒来的事儿 好在本人有些坚挺 不然真的很容易被她口射 逸淑老师奶子很白 腿也白 脚也白 个子高 武功高 认知也高 结束后聊天的时候 发现她还挺有文化 很满意的一次出击 会复购 【优点】…

👍9👏4😈1

6 Nov 2026, 09:22 UTC≈1,590 views19 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【公开榜】: @XMbmxc88 【时间】:2026-11-06 【老师】:晓柒 @tjy050918 【留名】:h i 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:10 【课费】:600 【环境】:9 【综合】:9 【过程】:给老师发了消息就立马过来了 ,老师全程指挥上楼,一进门就被老师给吸引住了 ,交了水费 ,老师就拎我去浴室冲洗 身材棒棒哒,公寓是复试的,洗漱完老师就让我躺在床上了 ,开始帮我服务,技术还是很熟练的口的时候很认真爽到我了,做的时候也很舒服,各种体位都体验到了很不错,女上特别爽没几分钟就出了,第一次结束意犹未尽还想来一次 ,又交了水费,抱着摸着好舒服,真想要是我女朋友就好了 天天吃。上课位置也好找 很方便,有时间指定2返! 【优点】:女友型 全程心情愉悦 值得冲 【缺点】:无

❤12👏6🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,420 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【公开榜】: @XMbmxc88 【时间】:11月5日 【老师】:@Aaqwe6660 【留名】:@jackiesamee 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:10 【课费】:600p 【环境】:9 【综合】:10 【过程】:群里一看,大胸老师兄弟来了感觉,立马约上。 直冲老师公寓,老师开门, 165cm,大D寒暄几句,双双褪去外衣,手拉手共浴,大胸很粉,很有感觉老师也很配合,然后来到床上,老师穿了丝袜,老师很香,身材非常好,先是老师服务,然后轮到我服务老师,摸着亲着大胸,弟弟硬邦邦,马上叫老师戴套,老师开始她的女上服务,两只小奶兔晃动,接着到我传教士,亲胸换成后入,后入屁股又大又圆,臀浪一起一起的,然后累了,休息一会,老师很耐心,又给我口,然后女上,最后侧入出货,真不容易。 在床上休息一会,然后跟老师一起洗去疲惫,幸福感满满,强力推荐 【优点】:服务拉满,态度很好🐻超级大 【缺点…

❤2🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 07:29 UTC≈1,410 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-11-5 【老师】:绾绾 @ww5201a 【留名】:七七 【人照】:95 【颜值】:90 【身材】:90 【服务】:90 【课费】:600p 【环境】:80 【综合】:90 【过程】:妹子租的地方有点偏远,明天说要搬,找了半天才找到,小旅馆环境比较差,确实是才开的样子。后面实在没办法,妹妹下楼接我上门的,找不到地方。😂进门看见妹妹,跟视频上面基本上一致,看起来比较腼腆,畏畏缩缩的😂,奶子捏了一下很软一副畏畏缩缩的样子,一问是刚刚下海,破处也没多久直接交钱开战。因为前面在ls那边洗了,就懒得再洗一遍了,妹妹也比较听话没洗也就直接给我口了,口的时候比较认真大概五分钟左右,确实是有待调教这方面,但是地下随便我摸,给我指插插爽了,一手的水就是嫩。然后妹妹在我的指挥下,在上面干,先抱着观音坐莲让她适应了一下,感觉差不多了教她腰部自己用力自己动,也非常听话失误了几次后成功跟进到我的节奏里面,配合着女上出击。妹妹做的可…

❤2👏1🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 15:59 UTC≈2,050 views17 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【公开榜】: @XMbmxc88 【时间】:2026-11-5 【老师】:绾绾 @ww5201a 【留名】:空 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【课费】:600p 【环境】:9 【综合】:9 【过程】:付完水费开始洗澡,洗完上床口,妹妹和资料上的年龄相符,很腼腆,但非常配合,老司机可以尽情指挥,下面很紧,稍微软一点都无法插入,过几天打算二刷PP。 【优点】:嫩,听指挥,养成系 【缺点】:暂无

💩11🔥4🥰2

5 Nov 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,700 views11 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【公开榜】: @XMbmxc88 【时间】:2026-11-2 【老师】:夏冉 @xiaran1314520 【留名】:翻斗花园小趴菜 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【课费】:600p 【环境】:9 【综合】:9 【过程】:昨晚怒二刷:进门发现妹妹还穿个睡衣,穿了个白色丝滑睡衣,进门递烟递水,笑嘻嘻的。我一抬头发现妹妹长高了,比了一下到我下巴了。将近170(本人188.腹肌双开门)看了频道近照跟本人对比了一下,频道拍的什么鬼啊,人比照片稍微好看一丢丢,我是真么认为的,开口哥来啦。熟悉的烟嗓,我不爱帮洗,自助洗就上床。舔一下乳头,然后开始舔龟头和龙茎。口活相比半年前好多了。会深喉和猛吸龟头,差点就被秒了。你不让停会一直口。开始传教士,然后后入,我是比较喜欢后入的。因为妹妹背后纹了她男友的名字,边日总喜欢问我跟你男朋友谁厉害,哈哈哈哈哈。东北妹妹就是耐凿,熟悉配方熟悉的味道。 【优点】:反差叫床声和背后n…

🥰7👏2❤1😁1

4 Nov 2026, 08:31 UTC≈2,030 views16 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【公开榜】: @XMbmxc88 【时间】:2026-11-2 【老师】:思思 @vxmnthr 【留名】:屁孩小 【人照】:8 【颜值】:7 【身材】:8 【服务】:8 【课费】:600p 【环境】:8 【综合】:8 【过程】:临时约到,快马加鞭的到达了最熟悉的地方,好巧的在楼下碰到了熟悉的人。到达科室看到门开着很大,我以为走错了,结果妹子出来叫我。妹子吃着水果,浅聊了几句、就去洗澡了,出奇意外的b挺粉的,水多,好紧,好久没见过这么紧的了,可能刚下海吧,都不会口,口两秒龟头就带t了,接着三个姿势,顺利123,太紧了,do感挺好,很润 【优点】:大蟒🐍,b粉,紧 【缺点】:精神小土妹,皮肤不好有疤痕。

👏11😁3❤1🎉1

3 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTC≈2,350 views13 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【公开榜】: @XMbmxc88 【时间】:2026-11-2 【老师】:小猫 @xiaomao1111111 【留名】:匿名 【人照】:9 【颜值】:8 【身材】:8 【服务】:8 【课费】:600p 【环境】:8 【综合】:9 【过程】:晚上群刚好看到来了个新ls 从刚好20分钟路程 抱着试看看的态度来看看 结果ls很OK 进门交完学费ls就开始帮我洗澡 洗完开始床上服务 各种言语勾引 亲测效果非常OK 值得二刷! 【优点】:优 【缺点】:无

❤7🔥4👍1😁1

3 Nov 2026, 08:07 UTC≈2,070 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【公开榜】: @XMbmxc88 【时间】:2026-11-02 【老师】:小猫 【留名】:Li am 【人照】:7 【颜值】:7 【身材】:6 【服务】:7 【课费】:300(半价券) 【环境】:8 【综合】:7 【过程】:小区公寓遥控上门,寒暄几句,褪衣自助洗,随后上楼开启三件套(过程一直看手机,瞬间失去兴致,后半程才放下配合情绪),遂简单出水离去。 备注:工兵任务,基本不写车评的,俺不能昧良心,6p的价建议调下,希望老师看到不要生气 【优点】:课室环境不错 【缺点】:身材一般

🍌1👍1🥰1

2 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTC≈2,370 views17 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【公开榜】: @XMbmxc88 【时间】:2026-11-01 【老师】:晓柒@tjy050918 【留名】:拿钱买快乐 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【课费】:600 【环境】:8 【综合】:8.5 【过程】:妹妹乖巧听话,很激情,床上功夫了得,叫声真实,各种姿势完全配合,很吃妹妹的颜,是我喜欢的类型,爽到了,只可惜没有69,如果有69我可以打一百分,总之好吃,爱吃下回一定还吃,女上很厉害,TG上也算数一数二的老师了。YYDS! 【优点】:温柔 会聊天 人照一致 【缺点】:无69

😁7🫡5❤2✍1👏1🔥1

1 Nov 2026, 08:42 UTC≈2,560 views16 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【公开榜】: @XMbmxc88 【时间】:2026-10-31 【老师】:小猫@xiaomao1111111 【留名】:BobTim 【人照】:9 【颜值】:8 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【课费】:1000p包时 【环境】:8 【综合】:9 【过程】:老师看着应该是刚下海。交完水费。老师帮我洗澡。我说自己洗。洗完给我擦干。老师也脱光了。奶子是极品粉粉的忍不住上去舔了一会儿。躺着老师开始服务嫩妹三件套。直接口硬了。老师带套了直接女上开始搖。我感觉受不了了直接换姿势。传教士一顿猛凿。5分钟出货。爽。整体不错。主打吃个粉嫩。喜欢嫩妹可以冲🤣 【优点】:优 【缺点】:无

😁9❤6👏1

31 Oct 2026, 08:11 UTC≈2,770 views15 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【公开榜】: @XMbmxc88 【时间】:2026-10-29 【老师】:小猫@xiaomao1111111 【留名】:Liweizao 【人照】:9 【颜值】:8 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【课费】:600p 【环境】:8 【综合】:9 【过程】:嫩妹,优点是人照一致,也算漂亮,没有照骗,本人看上去比照片呆,年纪小,很乖很呆,全程姿势和动作比较配合,一起洗澡聊天,没有催时间。 缺点是房间环境一般,位置较偏,过去多等了一会,小妹妹经验欠缺,略显稚嫩,需要调教。 【优点】:优 【缺点】:无

🥰8❤6🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @XMbmxc8888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“车友会出击报告” (@XMbmxc8888), 12,941 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XMbmxc8888.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.