今天风很大下雨,哥哥们出击不要忘记打雨伞
Signed 司藤·开课(苏州姑苏区)

Channel
@sitengprivatezoom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,063subscribers
+102 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002382346730 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sitengprivatezoom |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sitengprivatezoom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 2,063 | +11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 2,052 | +32 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 2,020 | +58 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 1,962 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 1,961 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 1,961 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 May 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,758 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
44 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤮 | 14 | 31.8% | |
| 🌚 | 10 | 22.7% | |
| 💩 | 8 | 18.2% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 15.9% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 11.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
今天风很大下雨,哥哥们出击不要忘记打雨伞
Signed 司藤·开课(苏州姑苏区)
【时间】:2026-08-08 【老师】:司藤 【留名】:王嘉尔 【人照】:8 【颜值】:8 【身材】:8 【服务】:9 【课费】:500 【环境】:8 【综合】:8.2 【过程】:老师态度很好,进门公寓 先洗澡,然后老师帮忙擦干,到床上 老师有B面,指滑过后,翻转到A面,口活不错,中规中矩,老师坐上来 还不错没有很惊艳,但是够用。老师态度很好,没搞出来但一直在尽力,继续让老师口了会,换手打出货,总之小少妇很舒服,态度很不错,中规中矩,不会亏,喜欢的兄弟们可以冲 【优点】:听话态度好 【缺点】:身材一般
Signed 司藤·开课(苏州姑苏区)
司藤的个人空间 pinned a photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 司藤·开课(苏州姑苏区)
今天开课啦
Signed 司藤·开课(苏州姑苏区)
休息两天,大家不要发信息了🙏不好意思啦
Signed 司藤·开课(苏州姑苏区)
142233 【出击时间】:2026-08-02 【出击老师】: #司藤 【评价人】:月亮 人照:9 颜值:9 身材:9 服务:9 态度:9 环境:9 综合评分:9 过程:身材很有料,非常的有女人味,尤其是胸部非常满意,感觉相当妩媚,看着就很想操,销魂的眼神直勾勾的看着我淫荡的不行,主动坐到我大腿上舌吻和挑逗,边吻边揉她胸捏她翘屁股,口中拉着丝就迫不及待给我口,在湿润的口中来回运动,口活很棒贼舒服,操盘起来基本要求都能满足,下面水是真多,主动翘起屁股掰开等着后入,好久没遇见这么骚的了。 优缺点:大奶妹妹 总结:推荐 苏大报告厅:https://t.me/szdxbgt 苏州主群: https://t.me/szsu3333
❤2🌚1💩1🤮1
Signed 司藤·开课(苏州姑苏区)
https://t.me/+55W27J3FHG84MGE9 复制链接把这个链接发到你的频道里
❤1
Signed 司藤·开课(苏州姑苏区)
今日下课,明天头课可预约哈
🌚1💩1🤮1
Signed 司藤·开课(苏州姑苏区)
苏州开课啦
👎2💩1🤮1
Signed 司藤·开课(苏州姑苏区)
杭州少女协会报告模板: https://t.me/hzsnxh 【报告时间】:2026-06-04 【综合评分】:8.83 【老师花名】:司藤 【验证留名】:只舔颜值嫩妹 【老师年龄】:20+ 【验证时间】:5月28日 【大概位置】:拱墅 【修车水费】:500p 【人照评分】:9 【颜值评分】:8.5 【身材评分】:8.5 【服务评分】:9 【态度评分】:9 【环境评分】:9 【身高体重身材】:155 【胸型大小颜色】:c,刚刚好 【湿度紧度】:水多比较紧 【户型颜色】:没有注意看 【毛量水量】:多 【环境细节】 【①交通是否方便/好停车】:交通方便,好停车 【②住房类型】:小区 【③是否有门禁】:无门禁 【④房间整洁度】:干净整洁 【个人卫生】 【①是否抽烟】:无抽烟 【②漱口水/牙刷】:有漱口水 【③一次性浴巾】:有 【④事前事后有无清洗】:有 【时间管理】 【①开课排课是否准时宽松】:宽松 【②课时是否做完】:做完 …
❤2🌚1💩1🤮1
Signed 拱墅司藤开课
Photo, posted without a caption
👎2🌚1
Signed 拱墅司藤开课
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sitengprivatezoom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 921,337 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“司藤的个人空间” (@sitengprivatezoom), 2,063 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sitengprivatezoom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.