Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

100x100 | напитки сто на сто

@x100polezno

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

178subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002633137011
TypeChannel
Username@x100polezno
DescriptionФункциональность и польза — шире стакана. Напитки, суперфуды и контент, который хочется читать. Пробовать: Яндекс Маркет: https://clck.ru/3NyFuS OZON: https://clck.ru/3QUJFN WB: https://clc.li/gfzhK Сайт: https://100x100.ai
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/x100polezno

Growth

1786 August 2026 — 178 subscribers8 August 2026 — 178 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 177–179 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 13:31178no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:04178first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 17 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
329
Videos
43
Links
61

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52808515911155892541241.4%
custom 5281033388491292669724.1%
custom 5197527391622169508413.8%
custom 5346203890800940485310.3%
custom 534600712546420877126.90%
custom 526039461893506833513.45%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 7 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Apr 2026, 06:01 UTC≈1,980 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С кофе всё работает. Вопрос — как долго и за чей счёт. И, скорее всего, вы не планируете от него отказываться. Мы тоже не об этом. Просто разобрали механику вместе с нутрициологом — и посмотрели, что можно изменить.

custom 52808515911155892542custom 52603946189350683351

1 Apr 2026, 05:10 UTC≈1,340 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

За окном плюс. В стакане айс матча. 🍵 Открыли сезон?

custom 52808515911155892542custom 52810333884912926692custom 53460071254642087712

26 Mar 2026, 04:41 UTC≈1,140 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52810333884912926692

26 Mar 2026, 04:41 UTC913 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Из новостей, которые хочется зафиксировать — мы прошли отбор в Акселератор Сколково* *программа для проектов на стыке науки, технологий и медицины. Вошли в число 500 стартапов с идеей 100% растительного премиум-комплекса для профессионального спорта. 23 марта состоялась первая встреча в технопарке. Впереди — два месяца глубокого погружения в индустрию вместе с экспертами. Делимся первыми кадрами.

custom 53462038908009404853custom 52808515911155892542custom 51975273916221695081

17 Mar 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,070 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Полка «без сахара» может обманывать микробиом… Сладко — не всегда вредно. Но и «без сахара» не всегда полезно. Совместно с нутрициологом Яной Казакевич разобрались, как сахарозаменители влияют на организм, и какие из них безопасны.

custom 52808515911155892546custom 51975273916221695083custom 52810333884912926693

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @x100polezno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 692,696 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“100x100 | напитки сто на сто” (@x100polezno), 178 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x100polezno.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.