اول واحد يكتب تخييم ياخذ جائزة

Channel
شَيءٌ قَديم
@wzzww
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,392subscribers
-1,420 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002123984995 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @hhhuh @wzzww |
| Description | الحَزن نابت بگلبي عروَگ.. - t.me/Karar . |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wzzww |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 21:19 | 34,392 | -49 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 34,441 | -131 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 12:22 | 34,572 | -51 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 17:41 | 34,623 | -106 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 34,729 | -137 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 34,866 | -185 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 35,051 | -15 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 35,066 | -40 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 35,106 | -4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:01 | 35,110 | -34 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 35,144 | -15 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 35,159 | -23 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 35,182 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 35,186 | -87 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 35,273 | -29 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 35,302 | -79 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:02 | 35,381 | -32 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 35,413 | -50 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 35,463 | -9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 35,472 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 23 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 117 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 237
- Videos
- 8
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 9
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 5
- of 25 we hold a reading for · 20%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wzzww. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 September 2025 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
كروب سوالف، اكثر شي بي جماعة التخييم..
https://t.me/Camp_iraq
إنتَ محد سوّه مثلك، دللتني وعذّبتني
File, posted without a caption
طاحَن بالخَريف اوراقَي گلت تهوّن تانيّت الرَبيّع و طاحَت الشَجرة أجر بيّها بسَناسَل ما اجَت وياي وَيّ الغَيّر اجَت بخيّوط بَكرة
أربع مواسِم ظَل خريفك يجيّ
Photo, posted without a caption
انا المَحد يمرني بيت مسكُون
كَون تشتاگلي وتلگاني مَيت
File, posted without a caption
أنتَ لو مشتاگلي يبين عَليك و چان شَمعاتي أشتهاهن ليلك
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @wzzww. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@axclw · 12,836#1
@imYouSif · 3,416#2
@issss · 36,375#3
@TSsiS · 78,130#4
@s_sssi · 19,591#5
@ieq4ee · 401,432#6
@xxifq · 31,628#7
@e_tt_s · 16,419#8
@CIITYYY · 4,671#9
@tils90l · 12,998#10
@vlxlii · 8,492#11
@e_ff_o · 4,742#12
@I8ii9ii · 33,164#13
@shamsalaseell · 358#14
@bggcp · 34,145#15
@bembe10 · 2,961#16
@nr0lll · 80,099#17
@TSSiX · 40,322#18
@TSSj1 · 28,281#19
@czz3z · 40,703#20
@llSPR · 19,766#21
@TSSJ3 · 5,650#22
@ccssva · 11,485#23
@ilrahim · 7,925#24
@FFA04 · 5,273#25
@rc_ert · 2,210#26
@sxserc · 27,474#27
@i611e · 13,489#28
@llbl1r · 2,061#29
@vc6Il · 134,270#30
@uiielll · 4,587#31
@JJ3DA · 20,890#32
@MH2lR · 15,523#33
@a_re1988 · 2,504#34
@a9O60 · 4,622#35
@DEPTH02 · 32,615#36
@zuvc1 · 15,519#37
@e0lann · 48,082#38
@GD16k · 14,935#39
@cckkxs · 14,854#40
@PPPPJ · 2,322,244#41
@lI_llIlll · 3,416#42
@jar969 · 7,816#43
@nbjkvh · 12,782#44
@lI7YlI · 6,304#45
@zzzzzz · 2,021,842#46
@tt_zzw · 3,334#47
@mashaarrawaa · 337#48
@CllOC · 18,072#49
@ai1ct · 262#50
@uiiiell · 1,075#51
@OAFL2 · 6,211#52
@MumilQais1 · 7,678#53
@m_12i · 2,481#54
@Tooe11 · 14,462#55
@dy50a · 945#56
@Ateaf122 · 48,487#57
@ALI16AHM · 2,471#58
@ially4 · 656 (as read 2 September 2026)#59
@lAlMosahfl · 776,254#60
@osunnylife · 13,669#61
@PPPJP · 3,195,038#62
@hayaa_0 · 72,224#63
@iraqed4 · 3,251,376#64
@iraqedu · 4,408,560#65
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@s_sssi · 19,591
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 30 September 2026
@ABDSH96 · 29,405
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 8 September 2026
@IATIIUI5 · 55,232
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
@czz3z · 40,703
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
@Ba_ik · 91,348
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
@Fatean94 · 28,724
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 8 September 2026
@MAKATIB1 · 35,078
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 2 September 2026
@I8ii9ii · 33,164
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 3 September 2026
@issss · 36,375
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
@KKK_JJJ88 · 22,717
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
@bggcp · 34,145
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 8 September 2026
@bagda1d · 67,148
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 August 2026
@iiiollll · 21,500
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 22 September 2026
@Ayus8hi · 24
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 September 2026
@sxserc · 27,474
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 10 September 2026
@nr0lll · 80,099
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
@llA0lI · 55,673
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
@samraa23 · 21,462
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 22 September 2026
@DEPTH02 · 32,615
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026
@ee_ka · 44,786
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
@emaan_faris · 27,391
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 September 2026
@xxifq · 31,628
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
@M1140 · 98,539
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@T_16_7 · 48,825
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شَيءٌ قَديم” (@wzzww), 34,392 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wzzww.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.