注意核查榜单上面的信息更新。
❤4

Channel
@wuxiheiche
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,033subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001786578014 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wuxiheiche |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wuxiheiche |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 2,033 | +6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 2,027 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 2,028 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 2,029 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 18 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
79 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 63 | 79.7% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 19.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2025 to 14 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
注意核查榜单上面的信息更新。
❤4
#黑车已下架
❤3
莉莉老师号被盗了 大家注意
❤5
今天老师已经联系 原购买账号被盗 骗子现在用于欺骗定金 本群所有榜单老师均不收订金 谨防被骗 已经下架
❤7
老司机 提醒 :别忘了关注本群,以防走丢哦! 无锡老司机论坛 【主群】 无锡小笼包【文叔新抽奖群】【备用群】 无锡老司机商务【老师开课通告群】 —————以下是频道————— 无锡公开榜 无锡老师榜 无锡报告榜 无锡避雷榜 无锡会所榜 无锡江阴 ——————分割线—————— 全国友群联盟 无锡色乐 无锡高端楼凤外围 无锡苏苏家资源 无锡泰巴适抓龙筋 无锡梁溪区温泉 无锡MMK高端女仆 无锡新区95spa 水疗三推SPA 无锡98浴室 无锡珑悦抓龙筋 夜锡上SPA95会所 臻品轩(四推 spa 服务) 进群须知: 1️⃣ 严禁广告,违规者将被联盟封禁。 2️⃣ 禁止使用俄罗斯或阿拉伯文字作为昵称。 3️⃣ 男性用户不得使用女性真人头…
❤27😁1
谨防黑车
❤3
黑车
👍15❤2
注意 !!注意!!!
❤4
注意避雷
不在群里的 注意辨别
❤3
已下榜老师
❤1
黑车已下榜单
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @wuxiheiche. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 876,029 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@wuxiheiche named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“黑车榜” (@wuxiheiche), 2,033 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wuxiheiche.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.