安全提醒: 如果你的TG对话框如图显示空白,则没有什么问题,如不是空白,有一串半透明的广告类型的字样,则可能有风险存在,建议使用本频道推荐的中文汉化包!
❤60

Channel
@CarGodcn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
60,122subscribers
-151 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002344493023 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CarGodcn |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 11 November 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CarGodcn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 60,122 | -41 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 60,163 | -36 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 60,199 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 60,215 | -28 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 60,243 | -29 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 60,272 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 60,273 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 11 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
767 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 587 | 76.5% | |
| 👍 | 125 | 16.3% | |
| 👌 | 21 | 2.74% | |
| 🎉 | 13 | 1.69% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 1.04% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 0.913% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.522% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.261% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 767reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2024 to 16 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
安全提醒: 如果你的TG对话框如图显示空白,则没有什么问题,如不是空白,有一串半透明的广告类型的字样,则可能有风险存在,建议使用本频道推荐的中文汉化包!
❤60
账号被官方冻结该怎么办 使用被冻结的账号私聊 @SpamBot ,点击开始后,尽可能的认真诚实回答机器人提供的问题,此为唯一申诉解冻账号的方式 #冻结 #账号 #解禁
❤53
反诈骗和防止盗号频道 可以点击此处关注
中文电报圈频道广播 1 地方群组 2 电报安装包 3 中文汉化 4 iOS解除限制 5 无法私聊 6 新用户必读 7 防骗须知 8 匿名号码与会员 9 封号原因 10 防止盗号 11 隐私保护 12 唯一官网 13 账号找回 14 常见诈骗手法 15 注销账号 16 账号申诉 本频道没有群组,也不会以任何私人号私聊,请避免上当受骗!
❤43🎉6👌5🤔5🔥4🥰4👍2
Hello Telegram Support Team, I am the creator/administrator of the Telegram channel "此处为申诉链接地址". On [date of ban], my channel was blocked/removed from Telegram. I believe this was a mistake, and I would like to provide additional context for your review. The purpose of 申诉链接地址 is [briefly describe your channel’s purpose, e.g., "to share local community news and updates in Xi’an" or "to provide educational and infor…
❤40
广西柳州 https://t.me/XCDDLZ 云南大理 https://t.me/yndlxcdd
❤12
临沂 https://t.me/linyidanai
❤13
东北 https://t.me/DBei_F4
❤16
telegram翻译功能故障 本月时间26号晚十点,部分用户报告称尝试使用 Telegram 应用程序的消息翻译功能时显示错误“Translations are currently disabled (翻译功能目前已禁用)”。 截止目前仍有部分客户端未恢复正常使用
❤34👍5
中文电报圈频道广播 1 地方群组 2 电报安装包 3 中文汉化 4 iOS解除限制 5 无法私聊 6 新用户必读 7 防骗须知 8 匿名号码与会员 9 封号原因 10 防止盗号 11 隐私保护 12 唯一官网 13 账号找回 14 常见诈骗手法 15 注销账号 16 账号申诉 本频道没有群组,也不会以任何私人号私聊,请避免上当受骗!
❤78👌11🎉6👍5🤔3😁1
https://t.me/CarGodcn/21
❤17😁1
和本频道沟通过的用户,聊天页面收到广告忽略清理即可!
👍17❤11
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @CarGodcn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 691,779 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@CarGodcn named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“中文电报圈” (@CarGodcn), 60,122 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CarGodcn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.